Freedom and free speech. Watching the dominoes fall

Joined January 2025
Emer Underwood retweeted
BENIGN? SAFE? SERIOUSLY!! EVEN FOLIC ACID MANUFACTURER SAYS 75% OF PEOPLE CANT PROCESS LAD MADE DRUG FOLIC ACID!! Its causing MISCARRIAGES & 9 PREGNANCY LOSSES per 1 NTD prevented and thats WITHOUT the highest dose in the western world being mandated.
Adding folic acid to bread is a safe and effective way to reduce birth defects. So why are Rupert Lowe and his acolytes so angry about it? Vitamin B9 is totally benign, says Rob Lyons buff.ly/yoxup2A
3
119
1
178
1,593
Emer Underwood retweeted
I don't want Digital ID, now or ever - and I certainly don't trust the state with that level of power over our lives. I made my objections abundantly clear in Parliament this afternoon to the senior civil servants responsible.
278
2,812
74
13,463
113,741
Emer Underwood retweeted
Every single sentence in your post is untrue. Labour’s 2002 ‘deal’ had very little long-term impact on migrants trying to sneak into the UK by lorry/container/vehicles. It simply moved from Sangette to other routes. Between 2014-2019 55,000 came in that way — an underestimate since many came in undetected and disappeared into society. Unlike boat people, nearly all of whom are counted. So it’s an obvious nonsense to say people weren’t being sent back because nobody was arriving. Tens of thousands were arriving. They switched to small boats when major advances in technology, perimeter defence of lorry/container parks and detection made lorries etc too risky to take. That’s why, from 2018 onwards, the small boat numbers grew fast. Nothing to do with EU, Brexit, Dublin rules, fairy dust etc. Why do you peddle such falsehoods?
2002 deal Labour struck with 🇫🇷 helped tackle lorry migrants. But small boats rocketed post-Brexit: 299ppl 2018 to 45,774 in 2022. When in EU, Dublin Rg was a deterrent as ppl arriving illegally wld be returned, so v.few came. We didn't send them back because they weren't here
388
2,627
124
9,781
142,972
Emer Underwood retweeted
Electing governments or politicians with only minority support is like handing a loaded gun to a monkey. The option "I VETO this election" should be on ballots. In FPTP, if a majority veto, then reruns until the majority are satisfied. In PR, % veto = same % empty seats.

41
197
4
1,057
118,894
Emer Underwood retweeted
"Burnham seeks EU embrace over AI" The reset becomes farcical. This would be so damaging to Britain that it is incredible it's on the agenda. Half the UK's growth comes from the tech sector. It makes no sense to let the EU regulate it. telegraph.co.uk/gift/8f09263…
60
300
26
1,016
30,211
Emer Underwood retweeted
This is indoctrination. Why are the BBC promoting open borders in a game for children? Deport illegal migrants and you lose points, but let them stay and a lawyer says it will make them “very happy.” I don’t care about making illegal migrants happy. They should be deported. And the BBC must take this game down.
192
1,404
95
4,714
73,076
Genuinely the best and most important post on the entire timeline right now. Zero question.
J’ai entendu dire que la France était finie, qu’il était trop tard pour la sauver. Mais la France est toujours aussi belle, enviable même. Sa grandeur n’a pas disparu, elle ne demande qu’à renaître. Nous avons surmonté en un an un problème cent fois plus grave, sans avoir les moyens dont dispose la France. La France pourrait y arriver en une semaine.
239
2,732
69
40,406
960,038
Emer Underwood retweeted
The BBC was set up to inform, educate and entertain - not brainwash our children. I tried the game for myself to see if it really was as bad as this article indicates. It is. The BBC need to explain why they are using taxpayer money to push a left-wing political agenda onto our children. Yet another impartiality failure.
97
747
20
2,657
44,443
Emer Underwood retweeted
GB Energy, the useless state-owned company established by Labour, has so far spent £14.2m on running costs — and £5.8m on investments. Running costs included the almost £400,000/year paid to its ineffective CEO and six executives on more than £100,000 each. What any of them has done to earn these sums is one of life’s mysteries. Perhaps it’s a blessing it’s invested so little. The £5.8m it has earmarked is for a proposed floating wind farm off the north coast of Scotland — a sure-fire loss-maker if ever there was one.
264
2,017
79
7,601
176,566
Emer Underwood retweeted
🚨 UPDATE: The BBC has reportedly suspended its civil service secondment scheme following revelations that government employees helped write and fact-check news reports on controversial issues, including illegal immigration and Channel crossings. The scheme saw 39 Whitehall officials placed inside BBC newsrooms over eight years, with some contributing to BBC News and BBC Verify coverage. Suspending the scheme is nowhere near enough. The BBC must be held accountable, every article these officials contributed to should be independently reviewed, and those responsible must explain how this was allowed to happen.
57
509
35
1,648
24,103
Emer Underwood retweeted
400% increase in just 4 days as people join 'Say no to folic acid' group on Facebook! Raising awareness across the land! All thanks to @RupertLowe10 FB post!!
9
254
3
482
3,507
Emer Underwood retweeted
you can see why Ange might not be keen on an investigation into the £55 MILLION in taxpayer funded housing loans, approved by Andy’s Greater Manchester authority, for companies linked to Manchester City’s billionaire owner. 453 homes were built but er … not ONE affordable home. Awkward 🤡
76
1,647
38
3,635
33,219
Folic acid must be avoided by millions and yet the government is adding it to our flour! Sign the petition.
I was interviewed by @RealEddieHobbs on folic acid. We covered a lot lot. Have a listen then sign the uk parliamentary petition (just Google folic acid petition). youtu.be/Cg3IG2RQxcg
30
807
13
1,729
16,455
Emer Underwood retweeted
♦️Under oath,♦️ Dominic Cummings just said what everyone in defence knows but no one dares say. Asked what is the biggest threat to Britain's Special Forces - is it China? Is it Russia? Is it Iran? His answer: No. It's not China. It's not Russia. It's not Iran. The biggest threat to the SAS is BRITISH MOD lawyers, the Cabinet Office, and Whitehall. In his exact words to the House of Lords committee: "It's not Putin who's launching lawfare against the SAS; it's not Putin who's destroyed procurement inside the MoD" We are watching lawfare waged against our own operators by our own government. While our soldiers are learning drone warfare in Ukraine, civil servants are blocking those lessons coming home because it might hurt their budgets. Our enemies aren't beating us. We are beating ourselves. Cummings is usually spot on 🤦 The country is in a tragic state. As Fred Dibnah said This country was built by men in overalls and ruined by men in suits.
120
2,267
38
8,042
152,618
Emer Underwood retweeted
🔥 Er … the BBC appears to be trying to brainwash our children. Now, this should come as no surprise, because the BBC is a fully signed up member of the UN’s propaganda arm tasked with ensuring the narrative is prominently platformed. Using the Bitesize website, the BBC teaches children about immigration, Net Zero and globalisation. And look what happens when children make the WRONG political choices. If children choose to deport migrants, they lose points. But if they choose open borders they gain 3 points for the economy and 2 for public health. If they decide open borders are too radical, they get ZERO points. BBC Bitesize tells pupils that believing migrants take jobs from local people likely arises from prejudice! Children are encouraged to petition local government over Net Zero, told they may need to fly less and eat less meat, and introduced to the wonderful promise of a borderless world. The BBC appears to see its role as underpinning ‘correct’ thought and that legitimate contested political questions are settled science and only the global view wins the game! And we are forced to pay for it🔥.
162
1,871
98
4,830
108,997
Emer Underwood retweeted
Canada, I’m warning you now. When Carney signs that associate member deal with the EU, here’s what happens next, step by step. First, Trump doesn’t wait. He doesn’t send a diplomat. He doesn’t call a summit. He just acts. Energy gets hit first because that’s where Canada hurts most. Oil and gas flowing south slows down or stops. Not because Trump hates Canada, but because it’s the fastest way to make the point that choosing Europe has a price. Then it spreads. Autos, steel, aluminum, lumber, potash, beef. Every sector that depends on the American markte feels it within weeks, not years. The Canadian dollar drops. Interest rates climb. Provinces start cutting services because the money isn’t coming in like it used to. Europe won’t save us. They’ll issue statements. They’ll hold meetings. They’ll say they’re standing with Canada. But they can’t buy what we sell, they can’t ship it across the ocean at the same cost, and they can’t protect us if it turns into something worse than a trade fight. An associate membership gives them influence over our rules without giving us anything that actually replaces what we’re losing. And here’s the part that should scare you most. This isn’t about one election or one prime minister. It’s about whether Canada stays a country that controls its own future or become a place where outside powers decide what we can and can’t do. The Monroe Doctrine was written 200 hundred years ago to keep Europe out. Trump is using it now to keep everyone out, including us if we don’t play along. You can call it fearmongering. You can call it politics. But the math doesn’t care what you call it. Three out of four things we sell go south. No deal with Brussels changes that. Not now, not in five years, not in twenty. So before you cheer for this and lift your elbows higher ask the people selling it one simple question. What exactly replaces the American market? Because if they can’t answer that, they’re not leading. They’re just hoping you won’t notice. We seem to be on a suicide mission and signing that Associate Membership with the EU is just tightening the noose! This isn’t a game!
2,445
4,265
320
19,538
1,246,157
Emer Underwood retweeted
Kids making fun of influencers just restored my faith in humanity. Nature is healing🤣
2,293
13,816
2,162
90,447
3,848,291
Emer Underwood retweeted
Democrats discovered billionaires in politics were a threat to democracy the exact day one stopped writing them checks. When Michael Bloomberg spent around $1 billion of his own money in the 2020 primary, then another $100M to help Biden in Florida, nobody called it an attack on democracy. When George Soros put $125M into a single Democratic super PAC and became the largest political donor of the 2022 cycle, it was "civic engagement." When Reid Hoffman, Dustin Moskovitz, JB Pritzker and Tom Steyer wrote eight- and nine-figure checks cycle after cycle, it was "saving democracy." When Bill Gates reportedly gave around $50M to a pro-Harris group in 2024, silence. In 2020, dark money groups spent over $500M backing Democrats, more than double what went to Republicans. In 2024, Kamala Harris raised more than $1 billion in under three months. Democrats outspent Republicans and lost. So the problem was never billionaires in politics. The problem is a billionaire who doesn't fund your side. And here's what nobody in DC wants to say out loud: old billionaire money is quiet money. It funds the foundations, NGOs, think tanks and consultants that make up the permanent establishment. It doesn't challenge the system. It is the system. It freezes the picture: same insiders, same incumbents, same experts, every single cycle. You can like or hate Musk's spending, but at least it's out in the open. If you really want money out of politics, start with your own party's donor list.
After spending $290 million to elect Trump in 2024, Elon Musk is now spending $369 million to keep Republicans in control of Congress. Vote NO on Musk, YES for democracy. Stop Musk and Republicans from maintaining their rubber-stamp Congress for Trump’s disastrous policies.
153
2,243
161
7,729
187,837