AI as a collective social phenomenon 👌
Michael Jordan (the machine learning one): "Superintelligence is Science Fiction" 🔥🔥🔥
di.ens.fr/~fbach/MJordan_ITW…
mingos retweeted
Today's Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine began with a question about pond algae.
Peter Hegemann and Georg Nagel wanted to understand how Chlamydomonas, a single-celled green alga, swims toward light. The answer was channelrhodopsin, a protein that opens a tiny channel when struck by blue light. Karl Deisseroth then placed that protein into brain cells, giving scientists a way to switch specific neurons on and off with a flash of light.
The result is optogenetics, a tool that has transformed how researchers map the brain and study which circuits drive behavior and disease. It is also opening new paths toward treatment, including early work on restoring vision.
Decades ago, Nobel Laureate Francis Crick, a longtime member of Salk's faculty, imagined exactly this. He proposed that the ideal way to turn neurons on and off would be light, while admitting the idea seemed "rather far-fetched." Today, that far-fetched idea earned a Nobel Prize.
No one studying algae set out to change neuroscience, but that’s the power of foundational science. A curious question about how life works can become the basis for tools and therapies no one could have predicted. It's why Salk scientists, from plant biologists to neuroscientists, keep reaching across disciplines to ask those questions.
Congratulations to Karl Deisseroth, Peter Hegemann, and Georg Nagel!
#NobelPrize #Optogenetics #FoundationalScience #Neuroscience #PlantBiology
mingos retweeted
In 1956, Cybernetics was renamed "AI" by logic programming experts. Now Trump wants to rename AI again. Let's revive the old name! Modern AI is about neural nets & deep learning, closer to Cybernetics than to 1956 AI. Plus, Cybernetics sounds better than Artificial Intelligence.
Theory, in other words, isn’t the opposite of practice; it’s what practice becomes once it’s generalised
aeon.co/essays/four-islamic-…
mingos retweeted
Great essay from @clarabcollier: asteriskmag.com/issues/15/af….
(You should subscribe to @asteriskmgzn, in addition to @WorksInProgMag of course. They have a very good print edition.)
mingos retweeted
🔥🔥🔥
meet @mostik_ai!
what happens when you put 12 PhDs in one room for four months? first place on the ARC-AGI leaderboard, which I can't say much about while the competition is still running. and this, which I can.
everyone's arguing about whether open models will catch up to frontier models. we think it's the wrong question. here's the one we pose: why does a frontier model have to generate your answer at all, when the only thing you need from it is the reasoning?
we do this by enabling models to communicate in latent space. through our protocol, hidden states pass straight from a frontier model into a small one running on your infrastructure -- no text between them, and neither model is fine-tuned. two models from different families, sharing reasoning, both left untouched.
how do we know it works? we tested it on a setup where a 753B model reads the problem, and a 4B edge-class model writes the answer. with this approach, we get results 80% as accurate as the frontier model, but at 20x faster performance.
we're committed to preventing frontier model lock-in and are already partnering with inference providers to accelerate open-weight adoption. we've done this between 15 of us, in four months, 12 PhDs and a Fields medalist, backed by @generalcatalyst
WIRED has the first external account of the company and the work: wired.com/story/russian-star…
full writeup, the setup, and all the numbers: mostik.ai/read-more
mingos retweeted
🍎 Just learned that the team at @Orchard_Robots has been using @GoogleDeepMind's Gemini 3.7 Flash to power much of their work! They recently migrated from Gemini 3.1 Pro due to improved speed, lower costs, and improved performance with 3.7 Flash.
Orchard is combining rugged, tractor-mounted vision hardware (FruitScope) with modern farm management software to track precision data across billions of crops -- from grapes and apples (❤️!!) to almonds and citrus.
AgTech + frontier multimodal AI in the physical world is incredible to watch! @reservoirfarms
mingos retweeted
Inside Reservoir Farms @reservoirfarms w/ CEO Danny Bernstein @bernsteinres
America stopped applying for farm jobs.
"We are performing precision surgeries using robots, but we still hand harvest fruit."
Bernstein spent close to 20 years in Silicon Valley, including ten at Google, then built 40 acres of working farmland in Salinas where robotics startups test machines on real crops. Second site opened in Sonoma a month later.
"There were over 400,000 of these jobs that were posted in 2025, and only 182 domestic applicants."
"It's not AI for luxury, or AI for abundance. It's really AI for resiliency."
We cover:
› Why fresh produce still has no automated harvester
› The two-year payback every ag machine has to clear
› Who actually manufactures these machines, and where
› What breaks a robot in a field, and what everyone underrates
› Why the next site is going on a community college farm
› Add a crop, add TAM
› YC gives you a million dollars in tokens. Reservoir gives you a tractor.
TIMESTAMPS
00:49 Danny Bernstein, Reservoir, and a technical community for agriculture
00:49 Silicon Valley builds seven of everything, agriculture waits for one
03:15 Driscoll's, Taylor Farms, Dole, and a $4.8 billion county
05:29 Not AI for luxury, and the three gaps worth building into
05:29 Precision surgery by robot, fruit picked by hand
07:50 400,000 advertised farm jobs and 182 domestic applicants
10:11 What actually breaks a machine in a field
12:36 Sonoma, and the plan to cover the top ten specialty crops
12:36 Washington, tree fruit, and the Cosmic Crisp patent
14:58 Two years to return the cost of the machine
17:14 Service teams, dealers, and Andros Engineering
21:50 Merced College, and building on a teaching farm
24:12 YC gives you tokens, Reservoir gives you a tractor
mingos retweeted
We’re asking the research community to help us build a benchmark for research taste.
Scientific discovery starts with a fundamental step: which prior work is worth building on? We want to capture this undocumented layer through our collective knowledge.
Please sign up: tinyurl.com/45b9ykae ↓
mingos retweeted
Today we release my favorite episode of Training Data yet: the great Rich Sutton.
@RichardSSutton wrote the textbook, wrote The Bitter Lesson (and many other on-point essays like "Self-Verification, The Key to AI"), and trained a mafia of talented students who went on to change the AI landscape forever including David Silver, inventor of built AlphaGo.
@kjaved_ was Rich's PhD student at Alberta and wrote The Big World Hypothesis. They just left academia to start @oaklab
Their core argument:
(1) The Bitter Lesson: the world is massively more complex than any model of it, so anything trained on human-curated data has a ceiling
(2) Continual Learning: intelligence is continual by definition, and today's models stop learning the moment they ship.
The conversation covers:
— what The Bitter Lesson actually says, and what people get wrong
— why synthetic data is "just a big mistake," and the Big World Hypothesis behind it
— how LLMs are both a positive and a negative example of his own essay
— why no animal learns by supervised learning, and what squirrels can do that we can't
— the cure for catastrophic forgetting: per-weight step sizes and continual backprop
— why the biggest labs can't take a path where performance gets worse before it gets better
— a trillion parameters on 20 watts, and the Moore's Law math that makes it plausible
— why the endpoint isn't one mind but one design, running as many minds
It was both a fun generative idea- and debate-filled conversation, and a surprisingly human one too. Rich, thank you for beating cancer and changing the trajectory of AI. 💙
00:00 Introduction
02:10 An AI winter, a cancer diagnosis, and the move to Alberta
07:07 Writing "The Bitter Lesson," and what people get wrong
09:53 Are LLMs a positive or a negative example of it?
11:03 Synthetic data is "just a big mistake," and the Big World Hypothesis
18:01 AlphaGo, human priors, and why prior knowledge and learning should be friends
22:37 "Their weights never change": do LLM assistants actually learn?
26:09 Babies, squirrels, and why no animal learns by supervised learning
32:02 Rockets, imagination, and where paradigm shifts come from
36:42 The Alberta Plan and its 12 steps
38:53 Catastrophic forgetting and the cure
43:43 Oak's biggest ambition: a self-maintaining mind
47:56 Why the big labs are stuck in a local minimum
49:13 If everything goes right: LLMs, many minds, and hiring
The man who pioneered reinforcement learning thinks the rest of the field is weird, and lays it all out in today's episode. Together w/ @Alfred_Lin @sequoia
mingos retweeted
🤣 Rebranding & ignoring some ppl are inherent to 𝐀𝐈.
“One reason for inventing the term [AI] was to escape association with cybernetics,” as McCarthy once bluntly explained. “I wished to avoid having either to accept Norbert Wiener as a guru or having to argue with him.”
mingos retweeted
"The model is the computer" is my all-time favorite company mission statement.
I feel like Taalas's weight-printed-onto-chip is an idea that will shape LLM research in the future
We are pleased to share that Taalas has agreed to join AMD.
We built Taalas to rethink AI inference from the ground up: hardware designed around the model, rather than the other way around. The result is the world's fastest and most cost-effective inference silicon.
Joining AMD gives us the scale, engineering resources, and global reach to bring that work to the world – and to accelerate what comes after it.
We are also excited to build on AMD's long-standing presence in Canada and its continued commitment to the country's AI ecosystem. Many of us grew up at AMD Canada, and are looking forward to coming home.
We are proud of what this team has built, and even more excited about what comes next.
ir.amd.com/news-events/press…
"Organizations must be redesigned around what AI makes possible: eliminating hierarchical bottlenecks so that workers can participate in a range of cross-cutting flash teams that allow operational data to continuously feed institutional learning"
Our democracies, economies, and legal systems weren’t built to absorb AI at the rate it’s advancing.
In a new essay for @NoemaMag, our Reverse Alignment coalition map out the investments it will take to rethink the institutions, norms, skills, and governance frameworks needed for society to flourish with AI: noemamag.com/what-humanity-n…
Stadiums are becoming more distinctive with clubs and countries using them to attract attention. As part of our Future Stadium series, we look at why stadium design is becoming more icon-focused.
dezeen.com/2026/07/28/stadiu…
mingos retweeted
China has taken it to new level. Bejing AGI bar
🔥Breaking:北京一家酒吧,现在来消费就送无限量 @deepseek_ai V4 Flash API Token🤯
从今天开始,北京 AGI Bar 的顾客只要连接店内 Wi-Fi,就可以免费获得 DeepSeek V4 Flash 的 API,并且在店内使用期间 不限量。
无需订阅,也不用担心 Token 消耗。只需要把 Base URL 和 API Key 填到 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor、Cherry Studio 或其他兼容 OpenAI API 的客户端里,就可以直接使用。
后续他们还会接入更多模型。
我觉得这件事挺有意思,因为它改变了一个默认设定。
过去,AI 服务总是和注册、订阅、Token 费用绑定在一起。而现在,AI 推理能力开始像水、电、Wi-Fi 一样,成为线下空间提供的基础设施。
顺便一提,这家酒吧是我朋友开的。他一直都在 AI 行业创业,AGI Bar 也慢慢成了中国 AI 从业者经常聚会交流的地方。
之前 Midjourney CEO @DavidSHolz 来中国的时候,也专门来过这里。
也许未来的咖啡馆和酒吧,提供的不只是咖啡、网络和电源,还会提供算力。
未来越来越有意思了😉
That's Minsky "The Society of Mind" approach
aurellem.org/society-of-mind…
the version of the future I'd actually defend: some constellation of specialized models communicating with each other, roughly the way parts of a brain do (one monolithic model that ends up being "the AI" is what I'd bet against)
and the hard part underneath it is the communication protocol itself: I think that's one of the biggest open problems we have right now
cutting the podcast into clips over the next couple of weeks, starting with this one 👇
el cuello de botella actual es la falta de mecanismos para convertir datos externos no estructurados en supervisión robótica fundamentada
el problema no es solo "más datos", sino su interfaz: hacer que esa experiencia física sea legible y aprendible por los robots
"Robots Need More than VLA and World Models" is a necessary read for anyone mapping the physical AI stack.
The paper takes a hard look at the core bottleneck in robotics.
It’s the 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗯𝗼𝘁𝘁𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗰𝗸: our inability to convert the world's abundant unstructured physical data (like internet videos or human motion) into grounded robot supervision.
To train robust policies, we need data rich in action labels, task semantics, and reward structures.
To bridge this gap, the authors propose moving beyond end-to-end scaling to build four critical pillars:
𝟭. 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗘𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲: Autolabel unstructured behaviors (like passive video) into high-quality training data at scale.
𝟮. 𝗘𝗺𝗯𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗮𝗰𝗲𝘀: Retarget task-relevant human motions or cross-embodiment data into robot-specific actions.
𝟯. 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱-𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹: Provide physics-grounded 3D reasoning to predict the physical consequences of actions before they happen.
𝟰. 𝗥𝗲𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗮𝗰𝗲𝘀: Infer task progress and success from video and language, enabling the self-improving deployment loops needed to handle edge cases.
When we transition from relying solely on scarce, robot-native datasets to leveraging world-scale physical supervision, systems can truly begin to learn from the physical world.
If you’re building hardware, VLAs, or the data pipelines powering robotics foundation models, how are you thinking about mapping out these interfaces?
I broke down the compounding loop in the graphic below. Paper link below:
mingos retweeted
The global economy’s AI stack won’t be a monoculture in the future. It’ll be multiple architectures working together, each solving the problems its systems are best structured to solve.
logicalintelligence.com/blog…































