Apprentice of Jesus ✤ Husband, Daddy ✤ Mr TQ ✤ Disciple-maker ✤ Strategic Inflector ✤ @C12Forums CEO ✤ I ♥ whiteboards | #BuffaloCulture | Alaskan Immigrant

San Antonio, TX
Joined August 2008
Jamie Dimon explains why JPMorgan stopped letting managers decide who works from home: The question put to him was simple: why not let each manager decide? Dimon's answer: they tried that. "I believe in pushing power as far as down as you can. You know, regulators want all centralized. I push as far... to the branch manager, to the trader, to... with rules and, you know, constructs and stuff like that." But on remote work, the delegation failed: "We tried that with this, but the fact is they simply didn't exercise managerial skill. Everyone gave everyone everything, including people at my management table, by the way. And I eventually said, 'I've had it with that.'" He is clear that he isn't against remote work across the board. He points to a test the bank ran: "We have 10% of our people working home full time. We put virtual call centers in Baltimore and Detroit. We did it to see if they'd be effective. They're highly effective. They work from home. They're mostly minorities. That's why we did it. It's a home run. So I'm not against it where it works." His position on employees who object comes down to choice on both sides: "I also completely defend your right to say, 'I don't want to,' but I don't defend your right to tell me what J.P. Morgan's going to do. So you have a free market. You can do one thing, I can do another. That's what's called a free market." He also argues that the debate is narrower than it sounds: "You all may not know this, but 60% of Americans worked the whole time. Where did you get your Amazon packages from? Your beef, your meat, your vodka. Where did you get the diapers from?" He lists UPS and FedEx, manufacturing, agriculture, hospitals, schools, nurses, sanitation, firefighters and the military, then says: "It's only these people in the middle who complain a lot about it. I'm being quite serious." Then he gives three reasons it doesn't work in banking. 1. Young people fall behind, and the damage compounds. "The amount for the younger people being left behind. I've known this for a while. We can prove a little bit of it. And that is cumulative. It's not like the first month you're working. It's by the second year you have less people, you're put in less assignments, you know less what's going on, you have less conversations at the water cooler or in the cafeteria. So it's leaving them behind. I won't do that." He adds that bringing juniors in while their bosses stay home doesn't solve it: "And to have the younger people coming in, but not their bosses, I have a problem with that, too." 2. People think they are focused when they aren't. Dimon says he always hears "it works for me," and he describes what he saw on a call the day before: "As I was talking, there were 12 people in the room and four people on the screen, and all four people on the screen were on their phone." 3. Management happens in constant, informal back-and-forth. "When we meet in the morning, we talk, we have these debates all day long. We're talking, 'Hey, no, I checked on that. You're right about that. Here's what I think we should do.' All day long, constant update, constant share of information." And on culture, he is blunt: "It's impossible to do culture that way."
120
179
40
3,102
901,478
Pure Gold: are you a hummingbird or buzzard tongued person in your family? Surveying a desert and finding the one great flower, or ignoring a forest of life to find the one sick and dying thing to fixate on? - @howertonjosh
70
Every man marries either a launch pad or a lid. - @howertonjosh I married a launch pad!!!!
2
106
Mike Sharrow retweeted
C12 just crossed 5,000 members worldwide across nine countries. The voyage continues. We are just getting started.
1
1
1
59
Mike Sharrow retweeted
Well friends, today Beyond the Multiple launches. 🙌 Somewhere around 10,000 books will hit the world today. This is one of them. I honestly couldn't care less about Amazon rankings and best-seller lists. I just want whatever God would have for it. I'm deeply grateful for the real stories God's let me walk alongside. This book is for owners who want the sale of their company to be a beginning, not an ending, for themselves, their people, and the work He's called them to. If you, or someone you know, is weighing what comes next or what it looks like to "finish well" this one is for you. It's written to finish in the time it takes to fly from DC to Chicago. beyondthemultiple.com In grace, grit & peace, David
1
1
30
Mike Sharrow retweeted
Watch the bait-and-switch: A) When the Bible is used to advance a “conservative” cause, it’s “evil Christian Nationalism” (that he’s spent his entire campaign decrying) or it’s “forcing your religion on other people” and must be FORECEFULLY DENOUNCED. But when the Bible is used to advance a progressive cause, aw shucks it’s just me being Christlike, “speaking truth to power”, and seeking “justice” or “compassion.” His whole campaign is, ”Christian Nationalism for ME, but not for THEE” and hoping you won’t notice. B) What progressives do is take the commands Jesus gave to INDIVIDUALS and apply them to the GOVERNMENT. When Christians use words like “caring” or “generous” they mean caring for people and being generous with their own resources. When progressives use the words “caring” and “generous”, they mean “vote for the government to forcibly take OTHER PEOPLE’S RESOURCES at gunpoint and redistribute it against their will.” Of course, this *always* backfires because governments do not work like people and churches, so with governments you tends to get more of what you INCENTIVIZE and less of what you PENALIZE. This is why cities and states that throw billions of $ at “solving homelessness” end up with MORE HOMELESSNESS, they do not “solve homelessness.” This is a theology-nerd thing, but in general progressives want the government to do the roles of the church and individual (charity, compassion, care), and they want NOBODY to do the role of the State (administer justice and be a “terror to the wrongdoer”). ^^^this always results in societal chaos and darkness. Further… What Talarico (and other progressives) always do is selevtively edit Jesus, so that he becomes a mascot for their cause. I can do a “when Jesus…” list too, but James won’t like mine… - When Jesus defined marriage, he defined it as only between a man and a woman - When Jesus talked about gender, he rooted it in biology, saying “he made them male and female” - When Jesus talked about harming children (abortion), he said it would be better for you to have millstone tied around your neck and be cast into the ocean - … that time when Jesus encouraged his followers to buy weapons for self-defense (Luke 22:36) - Jesus’ family strictly obeyed the government’s border / migration / census laws. - When Jesus talked about salvation, he said belief in him was the ONLY WAY - When Jesus healed the sick, he didn’t need a deductible… there were no insurance companies in AD 30, and Jesus was using miraculous power, not paying doctors. This would be like an anti-vaxxer saying “JESUS WASNT VACCINATED!” as justification for their position) - When Jesus fed the hungry, he FED THE HUNGRY. He did not vote for the government to forcibly take other people’s stuff at gunpoint and redistribute it against their will. I could go on and on and on and on… The point is, Jesus is a LORD of the universe, not a MASCOT for your cause.
When Jesus healed the sick, he didn’t ask for a deductible. When he fed the hungry, he didn’t price gouge for a profit. When the Hebrew prophets saw corruption, they spoke truth to power. When I take on this corrupt system, I’m doing it on biblical grounds.
415
3,071
249
11,789
414,624
Mike Sharrow retweeted
Most retrospectives fail because they become a performance recap instead of an honest review. Three fixes: prepare in advance, facilitate for honesty not harmony, guard against recency bias. Read our latest article: joinc12.com/leadership/devel…
1
3
81
Mike Sharrow retweeted
Dario has written that we need to “pace the frontier,” and Sam has agreed. People may be surprised by my response: go ahead. You guys are the frontier. By any reasonable metric — market share, revenue growth, model capability — the two of you have a duopoly on frontier intelligence. You’ve also claimed the lead is widening because of recursive self-improvement. I don’t see what you see in the lab. If the unreleased models are scary enough that you think you should slow down, I support your decision to be responsible. But stop pretending you need anyone else’s permission. Stop pretending antitrust law has to be suspended so you can form a cartel. Stop pretending you need a regulatory approval process that supersedes product liability. Stop pretending METR is independent when it is intertwined with Anthropic’s investors and staff. Stop pretending you need those same evaluators to police competitors who aren’t even at the frontier. Most of all, stop pretending the motivation to slow down is purely altruistic. You face massive product-liability exposure if your products enable a truly damaging cyberattack. The market already punishes models that behave in unpredictable or unauthorized ways. After the Hugging Face episode, it is simply good business for OpenAI and Anthropic to trade some raw power for reliability and predictability. Call it alignment if you want. It is also just giving customers what they want. Pacing the frontier would also create breathing room for a more intelligent conversation about regulation than Bernie Sanders’ “shut it all down.” China is very unlikely to join a global agreement, as you know, and that has to be taken into account as well. So go ahead and pace the frontier. You are the ones setting it. The easiest way not to build superintelligence is for you to agree not to build it. Demanding your preferred regulatory framework as the price of that will look like blackmail of the public and the political system. So just do it. If you do, you’ll buy goodwill for the next conversation. If you don’t, we’ll know this was just another bid for regulatory capture — or an election-season psyop.
3,409
12,295
2,707
71,977
9,627,654
Did Satan *STEAL* the rainbow?! Pastor @howertonjosh takes us back to one of the lesser known rainbow references in the Bible 👀👇
18
132
8
684
19,187
Mike Sharrow retweeted
Nobody tells you this: 99% of success is just the ability to outlast uncertainty. The one who can tolerate the most uncertainty is the one who will eventually win.
213
1,444
84
12,626
352,055
Great word on coveting, greed and stewardship by @Ed_Newton at @CBCSocial tonight!
1
65