How my coins try to break through resistances 😭

bro makes 2-4x on his bundles mostly with his copy traders and exposure he's given 😭

The argument Ethan makes here that "a strong token would survive it anyway" makes absolutely no sense to me. He is essentially saying that he buys 30–50% of a token's supply at an extremely low market cap because he believes it can reach $1M or higher. That's exactly where the problem starts. He does not even hold a token that long himself, or bothers giving the token attention to even go to 1M Marketcap or beyond. He instantly moves onto the next target - and that is what creates this imbalance. Someone accumulating 30–50% of a token's supply at a sub-$10 to 20K market cap creates an enormous imbalance between the amount of money they initially risk and the amount of liquidity they can potentially extract later. At a $100K market cap, 30% of the supply is already worth $30,000 on paper. At $1M, it's $300,000. And it was bought for maybe $500 - $ 1,000 - close to nothing. Now imagine that person constantly selling into thousands of $ into every bit of incoming buy pressure, while everyone else is putting in actual meaningful money, buying, and trying to push the token higher while one person is up an abnormal amount of money compared to the Liquidity provided to him in the token. Ethans counterargument is that if the token was genuinely strong, it would survive that selling pressure anyway. That is just stupid and shows that he does not understand the point. Through the huge imbalance of his paper-profit compared to the liquidity provided in the token and needed to be bougbt into him constantly selling, he is basically robbing every new person of their invested money, the r/r is not fair. This guy completely misses the point, because he does not understand the or care about the actual game Without one single person controlling such an absurd percentage of the supply, that enormous, concentrated sell pressure wouldn't even exist in the first place and a healthy community of actual members could form. The token wouldn't need to absorb hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of potential selling from one individual who accumulated his entire position for next to nothing. Instead, the supply would be distributed across more participants, risking a more balanced r/r, more similar expectations, and profit targets. There would still be selling, obviously, but not necessarily one massive holder constantly absorbing the buying pressure of everyone else. A way more healthy community would form and give the token live length. Imagine having 30% of the supply for a token that goes to 1 million marketcap. You would walk away with $100,000 in profits if you constantly sell like Ethan does, while creating a community of 3,000 and more people that basically just fall together because they got sold on by you and then start selling onto each other due to being impatient, they invested hundreds of thousands in total while you bought it for $1,000 and sold it onto them. It doesn't give the token the strenght and length it needs and should get to actually grow. It's not a demonstration of trading skill. It's extracting money from people who are trying to trade memes but get robbed before a community can even Prosper and grow. Essentially providing the exit liquidity for one Ethan selling into the first hours of attention onto a token.

Our timelines used to look like this, sharing our favorite meme holdings. Now it’s full of PNL’s that no one has ever even asked for 😭😭😭

The amount of money being systematically extracted in small increments, a few hundred or sometimes a few thousand dollars per token, across hundreds of deployments a day, is absolutely mind blowing. I guess, as Sebastian says, game is game. After all, nobody is forcing people to buy their garbage deployments. But when you look at the bigger picture, the whole thing starts to look like one massive extraction scheme, starting with the same thing that caught people’s attention in this tweet - yup the PNL card. The people buying these trash deployments are often doing so because they constantly see the insane PNL screenshots posted by our favorite “trenchers” on the timeline, like the one attached here for clickbait🤣 $100k+ months, nothing but green days, seemingly endless profits. These same people posting those PNL’s constantly promote trading fresh pairs, making newcomers believe they can achieve similar results by buying random garbage tokens with no fundamentals, no proper dev, and absolutely nothing behind them. They aspire to become just like those cancerous CT timeline trenchers, without realizing what might actually be happening behind the scenes. And here’s the plot twist: Some of the very same trenchers posting those insane PNLs are also the ones deploying the tokens and extracting money from the exact people they’re teaching to buy this slop. They’re essentially making money off the people who look up to them, while those same people believe they’re learning how to become profitable traders. It’s actually insanely funny when you think about it. The people selling you the dream of becoming a successful trencher might be the very same people making sure you never become one. We need all that stupid money to flow into good token, where real team work happens and stop feeding those devs.

So @Pumpfun and @a1lon9 have paid Jenny $11,000 yesterday in Callout Rewards. Below is a Screenshot of the top call outs. I am not hating, but this is just incredible wrong. Roughly 13 hours after these top callouts they are: Alon $36K to $103K - 3x Gayle $6.1K to $5K - Negative Dacity $194K to $138K - Negative Intents $94K to $71K - Negative $29.1K to $2K. - Negative And a bunch of others that are negative. Essentially, 13 hours later only ONE of the 20+ callouts is sitting in a positive, and the Creator got paid $11K for the call outs. Don't get me wrong, I understand people could have made a quick buck if they would have bought the callout and sold quickly after. I do not understand how this would justify being paid $11,000 - ELEVEN THOUSAND DOLLARS - to call these token. Regardless of that, all of these token have bad narratives and in another 24 hours i guarantee you that every single one of them will be at 0. Callouts should somewhat focus on rewarding callers over-time. They should make people want to actually call good token, good narratives. Say, coin is sitting at 5X after 24-48 hours would lead to a reward, or something like that. Definitely rewards should not be paid out based on quick X's. It's absolute non sense. Makes no sense to pay out callout rewards the same day. Just incentivizes pump and dumps.

I’m coming out on behalf of my homie @RichResearching 👍🏽🙏🏼 he’s very shy but there’s no reason to feel ashamed, especially today.