I may not be able to join, but here are a few of my suggestions: There should be a well-secured platform to collate results that will livestream results. This should be a priority. Agents shouldn't be just anybody. They should be people who believe in the cause and are willing to stand their ground in the face of any type of incentive. This matters because poorly vetted or poorly motivated agents have often been compromised. There should be super agents whose role will be to monitor agents. One super agent may be in charge of two polling units within walking distance. A third person, who is not known to the agents and super agent, should be in charge of capturing everything going on on video, of course except those casting their votes. This may range from vote buying, ballot snatching, multiple voting, etc. The device should be able to transmit to a central device and should livestream or upload within a few minutes. It's worth being careful here to ensure that this adheres to the INEC guidelines that restrict the use of phones and recording devices inside the voting cubicle, so this recording should focus on the polling unit surroundings and irregularities rather than voters casting their ballots. All agents should be trained by experts, and the training should cover the Electoral Act, INEC guidelines, the use of the BVAS and IReV, and how to properly fill and sign result sheets (Form EC8A) and obtain the party's copy. Every voter (not just party agents) should also see themselves as a protector of the vote and monitor all the party agents, including the super agent. The presence of vigilant ordinary voters at polling units is one of the most effective deterrents to manipulation. Willing opposition parties should encourage their agents to collaborate in protecting the votes of their individual parties. Coalitions of this kind have historically helped expose irregularities that a single party might not catch. Where there is limited presence of party members, more effort should be made to identify those who can collectively protect the party's votes, because rigging happens more where a single party has unchallenged influence. In addition to the above, it's important that agents know the result of their polling unit before leaving the unit on election day, compare it with what is uploaded on IReV, and escalate any discrepancy immediately. The reality in Nigeria is that most rigging happens during collation, not at the polling unit, so agents should follow the results up through the ward, local government, and state collation centres. It's also critical to record the total number of accredited voters from the BVAS, since the figures on the result sheets must match. And everyone involved should stay peaceful and law-abiding, because any violence at a polling unit can be used as a reason to cancel the results there. Finally, while peaceful conduct should be the standard and should be maintained everytime, never allow anyone or group to bully you. If they feel bullying is their way, make them know that bullying can't work.