I see @indiawilloughby is *still* lying in his bio about being "UK Woman of the Year 2023". He wasn't. To set the record straight - "India Willoughby was nominated (one of several hundred attendees), not the overall or sole “UK Woman of the Year 2023” winner.(thelondoneconomic.com/news/i…) Key facts - Contemporary reporting from outlets including *The London Economic*, *The Herald*, and others, plus Willoughby’s own writing at the time, consistently described it as a "nomination". Willoughby was nominated by a panel for campaign work and attended the Women of the Year Lunch and Awards on 16 October 2023 at the Royal Lancaster in London, along with more than 400 other [actual] women (thelondoneconomic.com/news/i…) - The organisation (Women of the Year) invites a large group of nominees each year. Its site states that each guest “is nominated by a member of the Women of the Year Nominating Council... attending the gathering as a ‘Woman of the Year’.” Specific awards (e.g. Lifetime Achievement, Campaign of the Year) are then given to a small number of people. The 2023 specific award winners included Baroness Hale, Merope Mills, Lisa Woodcock, and others—Willoughby was not among them.(womenoftheyear.co.uk/awards/…) - Willoughby’s current X/Twitter bio lists “UK Woman Of Year 2023.” This appears to be a shorthand or self-description of the nomination/invitation status that the event uses for its large group of attendees, rather than a claim of having won a singular top prize. In short: nominated and invited as one of the many “Women of the Year” guests for the 2023 event, not awarded as the winner of the title in the sense of a sole or overall recipient."