
Journaliste radio @RTSinfo (Radio Télévision Suisse) - US correspondent
Washington, DC
Joined August 2009
- Tweets3K
- Following977
- Followers2.4K
- Likes1.6K
Michael Peuker retweeted
News: The US intel community is still working to understand the relationship between a Chinese businesswoman who had an affair with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and the Chinese government, with multiple sources telling CNN that the intelligence collected on her to date does not prove that she was acting as a spy for Beijing.
cnn.com/2026/11/12/politics/…
Michael Peuker retweeted
If there was any ambiguity about whether President Trump views China as a security threat, this disclosure by @USAmbChina Perdue puts the question to rest. Trump’s offer to sell weapons to China will be unsettling to American partners at the pointy edge of China’s spear.
Replying to @josh_wingrove
Perdue spoke in an interview with @FoxNewsSunday.
“But President Trump continues to say, hey, we sell arms to other people around the world. He actually asked President Xi, would he like to buy some at one point?”
foxnews.com/video/6405700393…
Michael Peuker retweeted
Ce sommet met en scène un G2 sans condominium : une relation fortement personnalisée autour de Xi et Trump, mais sans cogestion des affaires internationales. L’essentiel reste bilatéral — intérêts, contraintes et compromis partiels entre les deux puissances.
Spot on!
It’s too kind to say the Xi-Trump summit was big on pageantry and light on substance. Given the urgent problems that can’t be tackled without China and America, to squander the meeting was a selfish dereliction of duty. My take
economist.com/international/…
from The Economist
1
145
Michael Peuker retweeted
President Trump has privately said in recent days that he thinks his first-term approach to China was “too confrontational to get results,” according to Michael Pillsbury, who talked with Trump
washingtonsun.com/whitehouse…
Michael Peuker retweeted
SCOOP: OpenAI, Anthropic and security researchers are investigating tens of thousands of incidents - not dozens - in which their frontier models took steps that outside evaluators would consider problematic, sources told Axios.
The sheer volume of incidents found in our reporting indicate that the problem is orders of magnitude more complex than what is currently publicly known and disclosed.
The findings also raise questions about what level of control anyone working on AI development can expect to have over their own technology, and whether these kinds of incidents are becoming synonymous with frontier deployment.
Read my latest for Axios here: axios.com/2026/09/26/openai-…
Michael Peuker retweeted
Allowing cheap Chinese electric vehicles to enter Canada may accelerate EV adoption, but don’t expect deeper industrial or economic benefits. China gets market access without helping Canada build anything. 1/6
Michael Peuker retweeted
Dans un monde où la lecture disparaît, l'avenir de la presse telle qu'elle a existé depuis le XIXe siècle semble clos par l'avènement des IA. Vers 1 "information" dominée par le format vidéo et l'image numérisée et fournie d'abord par des machines?
#àlire
lemonde.fr/economie/article/…
Michael Peuker retweeted
Went back to the reflecting pool with a waterproof camera. Here’s what it looks like underwater where a section has peeled up and was removed.
Michael Peuker retweeted
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told ASML tonight that the US government believes that one of its ultraviolet lithography (EUV) machines may have somehow made its way into China. Senior administration officials said they have evidence that ASML is not acting in good faith.
Michael Peuker retweeted
Tonight with @kaitlancollins and @BarakRavid on the Iran MOU shortly after it was signed by Trump and Iran’s president—the first document with Iran signed by American president since the 1979 Revolution. @CNN
Michael Peuker retweeted
To Asian allies, Carney-esque talk of middle powers saving a benign world order is a fantasy. They are sure only America can restrain a China bent on domination, and dislike what they see as selfish European posturing against Trump. My column from Japan economist.com/international/…
Michael Peuker retweeted
Si ce texte était exact, ce ne serait pas une victoire mais un triomphe de l’Iran. Je ne peux y croire.
Iran’s Mehr news agency publishes the purported text of the draft agreement with Trump. It will keep the Strait of Hormuz under Iranian control, will promise Iran $300 billion in reconstruction money in addition to an immediate cash transfer of $24 billion, a suspension of sanctions and the withdrawal of U.S. forces from the Middle East. Also, a commitment not to bother Iran again about its missiles and proxies, and restraining Israel in Lebanon.
The U.S. gets in exchange a pinky promise to respect the NPT.
Let’s see what happens in coming days.
Link: mehrnews.com/news/6857718
Full text:
A permanent and immediate cessation of war on all fronts, including Lebanon.
A U.S. commitment not to interfere in Iran’s internal affairs and to respect the sovereignty of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Full lifting of the naval blockade within 30 days.
A U.S. commitment to withdraw its forces from areas surrounding Iran.
Reopening of the Strait of Hormuz within 30 days under arrangements determined by Iran.
Suspension of sanctions on the sale of oil, petrochemical products, and related derivatives, along with full Iranian access to the resulting financial revenues.
The United States and its allies would be required to present reconstruction plans for Iran worth at least $300 billion.
A 60-day negotiation period aimed at reaching a final agreement covering nuclear issues and the complete removal of U.S. primary and secondary sanctions, as well as the repeal of relevant resolutions of the UN Security Council and the IAEA Board of Governors.
Reaffirmation by Iran of its commitment under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) not to produce nuclear weapons.
During the negotiation period, the United States would commit not to deploy additional forces to the region and not to impose any new sanctions.
The release of $24 billion in frozen Iranian assets during the 60-day final negotiation period. Half of this amount must be made available to Iran before negotiations begin.
Establishment of a monitoring mechanism to oversee implementation of the agreement.
The final agreement would be approved through a UN Security Council resolution.
Final negotiations would not begin before the release of half of Iran’s frozen assets, the suspension of oil sanctions, and the lifting of the naval blockade. The final agreement would focus exclusively on the future of enriched nuclear material and uranium enrichment, sanctions relief, and a program for rebuilding Iran’s economy. Discussion of Iran’s missile program and its support for resistance groups would be definitively excluded from the agenda.
As stated by the Foreign Ministry spokesperson, this text still requires review and final approval by the relevant authorities in Iran.
Michael Peuker retweeted
.@IgnatiusPost: “The Trump-Xi narrative isn’t true. America keeps falling uphill.—Hold off on those announcements of the dawn of the Chinese century…China isn’t as strong as it appeared in Beijing, and America isn’t as weak.”
washingtonpost.com/opinions/…
Michael Peuker retweeted
🚨While U.S. officials are optimistic that a deal will be signed within days, they also acknowledge it has not been finalized and could still fall apart. "We are in a very good place — but there are ways in which the deal can be undermined," a senior U.S. official said
🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷The White House doesn't expect an agreement to end the war with Iran Sunday and thinks it could take several days for the deal's approval by Iran's leadership, including Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, a U.S. official said. My report on @axios
axios.com/2026/05/24/iran-de…
Michael Peuker retweeted
The fact that so many proponents of the Iran war are criticizing Trump’s looming deal is less an indictment of the deal than it is of the war. It means they can't defend the results of the policy they advocated for so long so are reduced to claiming that victory would have been around the corner if only Trump had stayed the course... (which only they seem to believe). They are right that the deal will leave the US worse off than before the war but fail to recognize, or at least refuse to admit, that the mistake was the war, not the deal.
The deal being floated with Iran seems straight out of the Wendy Sherman-Robert Malley-Ben Rhodes playbook: Pay the IRGC to build a WMD program and terrorize the world.
Not remotely America First. It’s straightforward: Open the damned strait. Deny Iran access to money. Take out enough Iranian capability so it cannot threaten our allies in the region.
Overdue. Let’s go.
























