Michael Pullman retweeted
There are far more categories where AI agents making things more efficient will induce demand for that skill than spaces where agents eliminate the work. This is why the AI jobs predictions will not play out as advertised.
AI making it easy to produce more code will mean we start to apply code to far more parts of our businesses. We will build automation and software for things that wouldn’t have made sense before. Marketing automation, client onboarding, modernizing old systems, doing far more research on existing data, and more. More engineers.
Far more software will mean vastly more security risks. This will mean far more people thinking through system security, compliance, and governance. This used to be primarily manual and only large companies could afford this work. AI will make it so more companies care about this (and maybe can do something about it), causing more security roles.
AI will also lower the cost of a bunch of previously relatively niche or harder to access categories of work. Companies will now be doing 10X more with video and graphics, and will need people to manage that work. More media. We’re going to have a near unlimited set of legal challenges in a world of AI as AI helps write even more bespoke and complicated legal docs. More lawyers.
Then there’s the impact of AI efficiency on non-office worker jobs. Talked to a customer that said they’re going to make scheduling medical appointments and getting referrals so efficient the next problem will be there will be no booking time slots available. More healthcare. Many industries will have this same dynamic play out.
The examples are endless once you start to think through second order effects of agents making work more efficient.
Business operators: learn how to use AI or get beaten in *every* *single* deal by your competitors on pricing, quality, and speed of delivery.
Why?
Terafab goes live = massively more compute available + recursive self improvement + algorithmic efficiency = Opus 4.6 looks like a pocket calculator
Use it or cease to exist. Ouch.
What if you had a digital twin that didn't just chat — but actually did the work?
I just joined the Apex waitlist. It's a fully autonomous AI agent that handles comms, decisions, and real tasks on your behalf — 24/7.
Get early access: apex.host?ref=vo29pR9v
Also: Has anyone here actually gotten OpenClaw to recursively self-improve?
If you have, how did you set it up?
What was it improving?
What loop did you build?
What actually worked?
And where did it fall over?
Has anyone here actually opened openclaw up to their full inbox, LinkedIn, X, messages, and DMs?
Curious what youve seen once it had access to the real stuff.
What improved?
What broke?
What was unexpectedly useful?
Would you do it again?
In the last two weeks, one pattern is that AI-driven search surfaces are behaving less like neutral directories and more like opinionated intermediarieswith platform incentives
Michael Pullman retweeted
The most important skill for creativity is no longer original thinking. It’s taste and tenacity.
In the age of AI, ideas are abundant. Good judgment and execution are scarce.
The future belongs to those who excel at finding and amplifying the signal in the noise.
i spent hours inside OpenClaw and its alternatives so you don't have to...
here's the truth nobody wants to hear:
for the vast majority of people, it's a pure waste of time
> 20+ hours/week setting up and maintaining it
> constant memory loss
> debugging that never ends
> and you'll probably never get past the most basic use cases
it's not a toy and it's definitely not plug-and-play... it's a factory you have to run yourself
what i'd do instead:
take that time and split it
- half goes into building the same workflows in Claude Code or Codex
- half goes into getting dangerously good at one skill
more leverage, surely less automated, but 10x the results
(remember that eventually Anthropic, OpenAI and Google will implement OpenClaw's features in their agentic platforms)
This AI shit is cool as fuck. Having a ball tinkering with it all. Qwen3.5-35b on a Mac Studio hooked up to OpenClaw on a Mac Mini constantly running coding projects for me. Rad!
Prototyping a self-improving support process. Anyone know of a Apple Silicon-capable version of @karpathy's autoresearch? Keeen to run a training loop or two locally
The AI job displacement story misses basic economics. When something gets cheaper, people buy more of it. Coding is about to get way cheaper. Which means we'll use it for way more things. This isn't just about replacing engineers. It's about unlocking entirely new use cases.
Inspired by @AlexFinn I've now got a Mac Studio running Qwen3.5-35b. If @AnthropicAI keeps increasing their limits I'll never end up using it!
Love the tour you added to OpenClaw Mission Control @robsannazzaro . Forked it, added some fun changes :)
Michael Pullman retweeted
I hope you've found this thread helpful.
Don't forget to bookmark for later.
Follow me @heyrimsha for more.
If you enjoyed reading this post, please support it with like/repost of the post below 👇
The future is now! Subscribing to @Abundance360 via @Starlink from the car
@Melair caught up with one of your lovely staff at Gate 41. They’re taking care of it.














