‍ ‍ ‍𝘣𝑎𝘥 ‍𝘪𝑑𝘦𝑎 ‍𝑟𝘪𝑔𝘩𝑡 .ᐣ ‍ ‍

let's break this down, because this really lays the strategy bare. 1) lumping in "pro-transgender" with terror threats, evoking words like Jihadi and ISIS, very unsubtly equating these things that have nothing to do with one another, to subconsciously affix it to things you fear. 2) once again using their neverending posthumous martyrdom of Charlie Kirk to make whatever the fuck statement they want. 3) insinuating that Charlie's killer's "pro-transgender" beliefs are to blame for what he did, tying it to a string of supposed violent left wing extremist attacks, furthering the agenda that leftism itself is a terrorist group, and to be pro-transgender is to be violent and a threat to society (how many shooters have been right wing btw?) 4) the term "pro-transgender" itself is layered in many ways. saying this makes it appear as though being trans is a belief system rather than an identity, and belief systems are easier to make into threats. and while it implies that being pro-transgender is something violent and scary, it also plants the idea that "wow if people who SUPPORT the trans 'ideology' are bad, imagine how bad actual trans people must be" without actually having to say "trans people are evil." 5) strategically not saying "we want to eradicate trans people" but instead saying "we want to eradicate all scary things that threaten our lives, and btw trans people are that" it doesn't get much more blatant than this. it really doesn't. and i hope everyone can see this for what it is.