Mc2ndkick

It’s sad that we have to constantly go through and debunk the lies and propaganda put out and pushed by @FBIDDBongino @dbongino It's funny how neither @seanmdav nor @FBIDDBongino conveniently did NOT mention a crucial part of the Durham Annex. Despite the fact that the declassified Durham Annex only mentions Obama NOT EVEN a hand full of times, the Annex EXPLICITLY states — I quote: "On March 3 1, 2016, FBI personnel, including Deputy Director McCabe, Deputy General Counsel Anderson, Assistant Director for the Cyber Division James Trainor, and the Director's Chief of Staff James Rybicki, shared the intelligence information with Associate Deputy Attorney General David Margolis, the highest-ranking career official in the Department, and other senior career oficials at the Department. The FBI briefed Margolis on the specifics of the Sensitive Intelligence and informed him that the FBI assessed the information to likely not be credible. The FBI's assessment, according to McCabe and later memorialized by Anderson in an August 12, 2016, memorandum, was based on four factors. FIRST, the reports reflected multiple levels of hearsay. SECOND, someone involved in the communication, or in passing along the communication to someone at a think tank, may have engaged in exaggeration. THIRD, the [REDACTED] who drafted the reports may have engaged in editorialization or exaggeration. FOURTH, the reports may be unreliable because of translation errors." This comes directly from the recently declassified Durham’s Annex (pages 5 and 6) assessment of the intelligence regarding the alleged Clinton campaign plan. It EXPLICITLY confirms the FBI did not reach a definitive conclusion about the authenticity of the material. By material, it is referring to a two page memorandum of hacked emails received by the FBI that supposedly outlined Hillary Clinton's "plan" to create the so called "Russian collusion hoax." They dismissed it as hearsay, exaggeration, editorialization, and unreliable. Also @seanmdav and @FBIDDBongino in his full report, John Durham stated on page 98: "Although the evidence we collected revealed a troubling disregard for the Clinton Plan intelligence and potential confirmation bias in favor of continued investigative scrutiny of Trump and his associates, IT DID NOT yield evidence sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that any FBI or CIA officials INTENTIONALLY furthered a Clinton campaign plan to frame or falsely accuse Trump of improper ties to Russia. Nor did it reveal sufficient evidence to prove that the omission of the Clinton Plan intelligence from applications to the FISC was a conscious or intentional decision, much less one intended to influence the Court's view of the facts supporting probable cause." NOWHERE does the Durham report prove that Hillary Clinton lied under oath, directed false allegations at Trump, or committed any legal wrongdoing. Durham explicitly notes there is NO EVIDENCE of plotting or knowingly making false accusations. But I'm sure you two were gonna mention ALL OF THIS sooner or later, right @seanmdav and @FBIDDBongino — or, maybe you didn't mention none of it bcos it doesn't fit your narrative.