Chief Technologist and Director of the AI Governance Lab @CenDemTech / responsible AI + policy
Washington, DC
Joined October 2008
- Tweets2.5K
- Following1.3K
- Followers2.4K
- Likes1.6K
Miranda Bogen retweeted
fundamentally the same issues that firms selling AI audits in the late 2010s/early 2020s encountered.
perhaps the FAccT/AIES/etc. literature offers helpful lessons from the past so as to not fumble into the same mistakes!
Anthropic and OpenAI have sought significant control over what outside evaluators can publish, concerned that findings could reveal trade secrets, according to two people familiar with the discussions. reuters.com/world/behind-ai-…
Miranda Bogen retweeted
🚀We launch Evaluation Cards (beta): a centralized public record of AI evaluation results 🚀
Not another leaderboard. Every score comes with who ran it, the settings they used, what the benchmark tests and the other results reported for the same model, side by side. 🧵👇
Miranda Bogen retweeted
Celebrating Thirty Years of the Internet Archive with the ‘Class of 1996’
🎓
Class President: Center for Democracy and Technology
They didn’t just show up—they helped write the rules of the internet. And 30 years later, they’re still fighting to keep it open.
See more of the Class of ’96 ➡️ blog.archive.org/2026/05/07/…
Go Wayback to 1996 👉 web.archive.org/web/19961022…
#classof96
ALT Yearbook-style page labeled “Class President” featuring a retro screenshot of the Center for Democracy and Technology website, decorated with a graduation cap, and doodles; caption notes the nonprofit’s role in advancing civil liberties, free expression, and privacy online.
Anthropic’s announcement that it won’t incorporate ads into Claude engages honestly with the fact that advertising can cultivate deeply perverse incentives, even when platforms claim otherwise.
Claude is built to be a genuinely helpful assistant for work and for deep thinking.
Advertising would be incompatible with that vision.
Read why Claude will remain ad-free: anthropic.com/news/claude-is…
The choices that advanced AI companies make today about how they’ll cover the mind-boggling costs they are taking on to build AI systems will inevitably shape the systems themselves. That could have an enormous impact on our world for decades to come
For deeper analysis, see: cdt.org/insights/risky-busin…
It's happening. OpenAI is piloting ads in ChatGPT. 🧵
apnews.com/article/chatgpt-a…
AI companies should be extremely careful not to repeat the many mistakes that have been made — and harms that have resulted from — the adoption of personalized ads on social media and around the web.
For deeper analysis, CDT’s recent report Risky Business: Advanced AI Companies’ Race for Revenue explores the array of business models advanced AI companies are implementing or considering, including advertising, and how they are likely to affect users. cdt.org/insights/risky-busin…
Follow the money 💰 Frontier AI companies are converging on a set of business models as they race to generate returns — and what that means for the rest of us. cdt.org/insights/risky-busin…
Miranda Bogen retweeted
Today @CenDemTech released a report on the risks of AI to people with eating disorders. As AI systems become more prevalent, their mental-health impacts can't be ignored. To build safeguards, we must develop risk assessments that reflect how AI impacts people in the real world.
Miranda Bogen retweeted
I'm so excited to highlight a new report from @CenDemTech: "Opening the Book: A Rubric to Support Effective Transparency for EdTech Products That Incorporate AI." My colleagues introduce a rubric for assessing how transparently edtech vendors communicate about their AI products.
Miranda Bogen retweeted
AI companies are starting to build more and more personalization into their products, but there's a huge personalization-sized hole in conversations about AI safety/trust/impacts.
Delighted to feature @mbogen on Rising Tide today, on what's being built and why we should care:
Miranda Bogen retweeted
If we want to understand and shape how advanced AI behaves, we need to know the rules it’s supposed to follow. This requires a type of transparency that’s different from what most policymakers focus on today. @aawinecoff, @mbogen, and I explain in a new report for @CenDemTech:
Miranda Bogen retweeted
This last sentence seems false?
The system card does not appear to have been updated even to incorporate the information in this thread.
The whole point of the term system card is that the model isn’t the only thing that matters.
OpenAI o3-pro is available in the model picker for Pro and Team users starting today, replacing OpenAI o1-pro.
Enterprise and Edu users will get access the week after.
As o3-pro uses the same underlying model as o3, full safety details can be found in the o3 system card.
help.openai.com/en/articles/…
Miranda Bogen retweeted
NEW REPORT: CDT AI Governance Lab’s’s Assessing AI reportAudits looks at the rise of complex automated systems which demand a robust ecosystem for managing risks and ensuring accountability. cdt.org/insights/assessing-a… cc: @MBogen
ALT Graphic for CDT AI Gov Lab's report, "Assessing AI: Surveying the Spectrum of Approaches to Understanding and Auditing AI Systems." Illustration of a collection of AI "tools" and "toolbox" – a hammer and red toolbox – and a stack of checklists with a pencil.
Miranda Bogen retweeted
Machine unlearning is taking off! There is a ton of interest in getting generative AI models to “unlearn” targeted undesirable information, often to meet policy aims in privacy, copyright, safety, etc.
Our new cross-disciplinary collaboration shows why this isn’t simple.
Miranda Bogen retweeted
Companies often attribute their focus on English AI to the lack of resources in non-English langs. New brief written by @Evani_RD and @mbogen highlights the incredible work researchers are doing on multilingual AI if only companies wanted to work with them cdt.org/insights/beyond-engl…
