And the issue with throwing the presumption of innocence as a standard is the problem many have with legal education in this country. You can't have basic conversations in this country without people throwing legal jargon all over. What at all are we teaching as law in our schools. Presumption of innocence is a legal standard. Strictly speaking, that belongs in a courtroom. It is not a universal shield to be thrown up every time a moral or ethical question demands an answer. Nobody here has suggested that the headmaster be thrown in jail without a hearing. The legal process will take its course. That is not at all what is being debated. The conversation here is about the ethical and moral standards that political parties and institutions are expected to hold themselves to. When 19 children come forward with allegations of sexual abuse, rape, and defilement, serious institutions do not hide behind legal mantras. They take a principled stance. They act. They make it unambiguously clear where they stand. The NDC itself should have hurriedly put together a major investigation and act. That is the conversation. Not the legal one. The moral one. And on that standard, invoking innocent until proven guilty is not a defence. It is an evasion.