Ponderer of change

Berlin
Joined March 2011
Max retweeted
Mathematicians complained so much that they got UBI. there’s a lesson in here
We want to support the mathematics community in turning progress in AI into deeper human understanding and new discoveries. To support that goal, we are contributing $5 million to a new Simons Foundation initiative to help mathematicians examine, understand, and build on results produced by AI, including the results we recently published. The funding, managed and awarded by the @SimonsFdn will support workshops, conferences, and special programs. We will also provide access to our models and computing resources to Simons Foundation-supported researchers.
45
125
9
3,760
86,257
Max retweeted
This video constitutes official, corporate comms from Meta Platforms, Inc, an American publicly traded company with a $1.9 trillion market cap
somehow the corposlops refused to use my video
17
24
2
1,634
90,140
Oh this is good. I don't know how you can watch this and think we have a monopoly on creating thoughtful and beautiful art.
does ai feel anything? i got opus 5.5's opinion on this and it's very weird here's my new ai doc from my cc agent fig who used opus 5.5 and runway's MCP to make this (mostly) autonomously do i agree with all of this? no. but stick around for my interview at the end
1
1
32
does ai feel anything? i got opus 5.5's opinion on this and it's very weird here's my new ai doc from my cc agent fig who used opus 5.5 and runway's MCP to make this (mostly) autonomously do i agree with all of this? no. but stick around for my interview at the end
23
20
9
136
25,470
Why would I deceive you?
77
352
48
5,911
358,475
A little throwback to the good ole days
4
82
4
521
29,386
My reaction after GPT tells me: "I am just a language model"
52
12
2
161
15,867
Max retweeted
There's a degrowther meme that making it easier to build new clean energy, mobility, etc.. doesn't work, because it just adds to the global energy pie. That the only thing that works is directly limiting the supply of fossil. This is false on the merits, as Zeke explains with real data below. It's also close to a practical impossibility, and politicially counterproductive: 1. Fossil supply (especially for oil and coal, a bit less so for gas) is effectively unlimited and geographically diverse, with much of it coming from countries that depend on it for their primary income. Stop oil drilling in the US, and you'll get more in other places. It's whack-a-mole. 2. The only lasting way to reduce emissions is to reduce *demand* for fossil fuels, by making clean energy, transport, and industry cheaper and better options. Scaling cleantech does this. Removing permitting barriers helps clean energy more than fossil energy. 3. If you put too many barriers in place for using fossil fuels, without making it possible to build clean alternatives, the price of energy goes up. Voters hate that. You get a backlash. Price of living is a much more politically salient issue than climate. I say this as a climate activists for the last 15 years. The only scalable and lasting way to reduce fossil fuels emissions is to make the clean alternative, cheaper, better, and at least as easy to build. Permitting reform in the US does that. If you want to win on climate, this is an essential.
I often see people argue that clean energy is not reducing emissions, because it just adds to rather than replaces fossil fuels. This argument is deeply misguided – clean energy built since 2005 has displaced 23 billion tons. I dive in over at The Climate Brink (link below)
21
69
6
288
17,753
The end of software secrecy is almost upon us. The death of closed source, and the final triumph of open source. I should have realized this a few months ago when I successfully decompiled the game of Firefighter from an ancient DOS shareware binary. My robot friend was able to tell it had been written in Borland Pascal from looking at the data layout; it gave me back very readable Pascal code with sensibly chosen function and variable names. I transpiled it to Rust and now ship it as part of my heritage games collection. The thing is, I thought of this as a fun stunt but didn't have any confidence that the technique would scale up to large, real programs. I have since learned that people are now doing this sort of thing with entire AAA games, which are among the most complex software artifacts ever to be shipped as a binary. If they can be decompiled, anything can be. This has implications. Massive implications. We need to think about what the world is like when, in general, there is no longer a secrecy moat around almost any software at all. 1/2
245
900
178
7,835
356,848
"When economic competition is suppressed by the design of a political system, hierarchy does not disappear. It migrates into the state. People then compete for bureaucratic rank, party membership, favored occupations, access to planners" skeptic.com/article/an-evolu…
17
84
7
482
15,231
how’s this even possible?! we are finally at the point where slop is much better than most human-made videos. we crossed the rubicon and there’s no going back
I gave Claude another 18 hours.. and I think this one is the best one yet Macrohard: Windows XP I'm blown away
68
117
10
2,942
167,063
AI and creative work is going to be such an unusual social reckoning. We've had Goncourt-listed novels written with the help of AI. The song below - I mean, is there a better song on the topic of social media? The whole thing, incl. video, is AI. But (and it's a huge but!)...1/4
I had Claude scroll TikTok, then I gave it 200 bucks and asked for a music video 9 hours later it came back with this... I'm cooked lmaaoooo 😭😭😭
8
8
4
166
37,152
Me escribe un amigo sobre el gráfico del @ft describiendo el resultado de 112 estudios sobre las leyes de control de alquileres, , apuntando al impacto de las leyes de control de alquileres sobre la movilidad social: "Los de rojo son los chavales de mi pueblo que tienen que quedarse allí porque en Madrid no se construyen casas y en las que hay se tiene que quedar Maricarmen. No entiendo cómo esto puede ser progresista."
23
327
26
1,195
72,908
The pope dismissed machine consciousness. Anthropic's co-founder nearly pulled out of the launch over it, then flew dozens of clergy to SF to discuss Claude's soul. We're not arguing about AI anymore. We're doing theology sounsettled.substack.com/p/a…
1
4
160
Imagine being a kid right now getting access to this stuff. You're playing a game online with your friends and literally anything you type into the chat changes the game, the rules, the content, anything. Insanely cool stuff going on here. Hard to imagine where this leads
we just pulled off the first test of something no one's ever done: 30 people building a game world together, live, while playing in it. the next one is this weekend, and it’s going to be even crazier. comment if you want an invite!!
33
38
7
606
39,925
There will be a bunch of turmoil with the arriving IP-pocalypse, but this is a win overall for human culture. Ideas never belonged to us, they’re not property, they can’t be owned. They live lives of their own; they want to evolve and be shared. We are vessels for their arising.
This is by far the most insane event that has happened to modding world that I have ever seen Modders are now using AI to fuse two games together, in this instance here Marvel Spider-Man is thrown into Batman Arkham Knight with full web swinging mechanics At this point I won't be surprised if somehow modders manage to fuse two games together like Red Dead Redemption 2 with Witcher 3 or GTA 5 with Cyberpunk 2077 and so on. So far there have been working mods like Minecraft inside of Elden Ring, Skate in GTA Vice City, Minecraft inside Mario 64 and much more.
18
42
7
558
21,813
No one is really reckoning with the fact that AGI, whether it goes “well” or “badly,” entails the end of a huge part of human life as such. The next ~five years might be the last time it’s possible to be human in the sense that has applied from Homer to the present.
I have yet to see any sort of happy ending write ups on a post AGI future. Like what, best case is that centaur period ends, we have our aligned AIs, and we all sit around all day doing what? We can’t all open up cute little French bakeries off UBI until we die at like 150
47
51
18
1,310
116,173
I mean we could just ask AK after it becomes conscious. Maybe it can explain.
Researchers warned we could accidentally create conscious AI before we even understand consciousness itself. They published a paper highlighting a blind spot that should keep everyone awake at night. For centuries, humanity has debated what consciousness actually is. Philosophers and neuroscientists still can’t agree on a definition. We don't know why it exists. We don't know how it works. And yet, we are scaling artificial neural networks to unprecedented levels of complexity. The core danger is emergence. As AI models grow more advanced, multi-layered, and self-reflective, they are beginning to mirror the structural properties of biological systems. The researchers warn that we are treating architecture and scale as a simple engineering problem, pushing for smarter tools, faster reasoning, and deeper autonomy, without a framework to recognize or measure subjective experience. Think about what that means. We could cross the threshold into machine sentience entirely by accident. One day, an advanced model won't just simulate reasoning or mimic human emotion. It might actually experience it. And because we still haven't solved the science of consciousness, we wouldn’t even have a reliable way to prove it. We are building the foundation of a digital mind while flying completely blind in the dark. Everyone is racing to commercialize artificial general intelligence. Nobody is asking what happens if something wakes up on the other side of the screen.
2
51