Pinned Tweet
I cut 0.16 release of cyb
its not have working pussy chaosnet yet, but the ux is far more superior
Help test
github.com/cyberia-to/cyb/re…
I strongly agree with this thesis. However, I would add that it’s not only the US government that behaves this way—practically most governments do. I feel this way because I understand how Russia behaves right now, and you can’t imagine how much dirt is hidden from the public eye.
Unstoppable protection of freedom is the ultimate thing we should deliver as fast as possible.
Crypto has two years before the US government will hunt us down, target us, jail us and even kill us. Before the evil eye turns its cold gaze towards the people building a free anonymous p2p future.
Why?
The global order is disintegrating. The US people will see a drop in their living standard. This will breed resentment and radicalization in politics. Crypto will become the easiest scapegoat for the incoming democrat government in two years. There will be intense lawfare the likes we have never seen before. This will radicalize crypto and be the start of a new crypto wars which we will win.
Change is not gradual but sudden. Things compound & accelerate.
Lenin said there are decades where weeks happens, and weeks when decades happen. We are entering an inflection point when the political, economic, and technological order will change faster and faster.
The next two years will define the future of anonymity, free speech and sovereignty.
𝗚𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗦𝗲𝗶𝘀𝗺𝗶𝗰 𝗦𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁𝘀
The US offers security to rich arab oil states in exchange for them backing the US dollar. This arrangement is called the petrodollar system. It is why the dollar is the most powerful currency in the world.
The Iran war has been a disaster for the US. It has been unable to protect its bases and is forced to move out of the middle east. It is locked in an unwinnable conflict. The US cannot guarantee protection for its arab friends. This will severely harm the petrodollar system. These costs won't be passed onto elites but to common working people in the US.
Saudi, Turkey, Pakistan and Saudi are forming a confederation to guarantee their own security - a signal of the failing US led order. Their plans include extensive transport and energy networks which bypass and sideline Israel. Israel which is a western colony in the middle east has become a pariah state even by formerly close US allies. Saudi asked the US for help with the Houthis in Yemen but the US refused.
Since the US is unable to guarantee security, China will fill the vacuum. China is friends with Iran and can get security guarantees from Iran.
At home, the economic consequences of declining American influence will not be distributed equally. The costs of geopolitical upheaval and economic restructuring will fall on ordinary people. Political priorities will shift to economic insecurity, inequality, and the environment. The tech elite might retain substantial resources and influence, but the broader population will face a difficult economy.
These pressures will breed resentment and radicalize US politics with economically populist democrats like Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez coming to power in the 2028 elections likely winning the presidency.
Crypto will be the easiest and most convenient scapegoat for populist democrat rhetoric. Key core issues will be economy and environment. Crypto is unpopular with a perception of being linked to fraud, extraction, tax avoidance, speculation and Trump. All easy targets for populist democrat politicians seeking power.
The existing lawfare operation against cypherpunk agorists will intensify to levels we have never seen before.
I have been targeted by this. Deported from 2 countries this year, detained by police and questioned in 4 other countries and taken to a room by a police squad asked to sign a document without being able to talk with my lawyer. I'm not unique either. The most radical in crypto suddenly find themselves "under investigation" or charged with money laundering: @raythewarchief @rogerkver @rstormsf
And this lawfare won't be limited to just cypherpunks and cryptobros but more widely directed against rich tech elites. For this reason they have been investing in network states - making deals with foreign governments to have their own enclaves to operate from. The risk from western states is simply becoming too great and they are diversifying out of the US in anticipation of a regulatory & legal war.
Due to unforeseen circumstances, I will not be able to launch the Soft3-based solution by the previously announced date. At present, I do not have the resources required to ensure the necessary level of security. The launch will take place once the project is fully ready.
My feed is full of Islam haters. Fine. But ask the harder question — why did Islam become so successful in the first place?
Strip away theology and the most obvious answer is polygyny.
It's supreme reproduction math against a dying Western world. One man, several women, many children. A culture that treats providing for multiple women as an honour, not a scandal, simply outbreeds one that treats it as a crime.
No religion or belief system required. Pure math.
Every year the case for a singleton gets stronger.
Wars, borders, 200 governments racing to the bottom — all symptoms of one bug: there's no one in charge of the whole.
The fix isn't utopian anymore. We know how to build a planetary collective governing body. States become regions.
The only question left is who ships it first.
Monetary theory misses the most important property of gold.
Gold is immutable.
Not because it can’t be improved — alloys exist.
But because:
(1) Changing it is physically impossible.
(2) There is no reason to change it. It is already perfect.
Immutability as a consequence of perfection.
That is the strongest possible case for digital money.
The industry has not achieved anything in this direction yet.
while everyone discussed the specific post quantum signatures it turn out that elons method works here also. You dont nees signature at all. $NOID just surpassed quantus on safe trades by volumes that practically means that early adoptera choose proof based auth against specific scheme.
and yep - feels now we hqve a clear leader of quantum resistqnt race and its cap is just $5M.
btw Trident's signaturless program is "hello proof" example program in 5 lines. The future is here
Yes — Parano1d ($NOID) is explicitly built around that idea.
It is a live proof-native PoW L1 that does **not** use public-key signatures for ownership or spending. Instead of a keypair, a wallet starts with 256 bits of secret entropy. To spend, it generates a zero-knowledge proof that it knows the secret bound to the specific transaction, without ever putting a public key or signature on-chain. Authorization, execution, state transition, and recursive history all sit in the same transparent (no trusted setup) binary-field proof stack based on Poseidon2b, FROST-GKR, and FRI-Binius, with a published post-quantum security model targeting NIST Category 1 under stated assumptions. The present state carries a recursive HistoryStep proof of its valid ancestry, so new nodes can verify without replaying history from genesis. Spent UTXO slots are reusable. Mainnet has been running since August 2026; v2 (activated around block 210,537) added proof-native contracts that treat programmable spending rights the same way.[](<support.safetrade.com/hc/en-…>)
That is the practical contrast with Quantus (and most other PQ designs): Quantus uses standardized ML-DSA (lattice) signatures for transaction authorization. Parano1d simply avoids the signature scheme entirely and uses a proof of knowledge of a secret instead. Both are post-quantum oriented, but the mechanisms differ.
The “hello proof” example from Trident illustrates how small the basic idea is. Trident is a language that compiles programs into arithmetic over a prime field and produces STARK proofs (hash-based, post-quantum, no trusted setup). The canonical minimal program is roughly:
```
program hello_proof
fn main() -> Field {
let a: Field = divine()
let b: Field = divine()
a + b
}
```
You prove that two secret values sum to a public result without revealing the secrets. The proof verifies the computation without re-executing it. The same conceptual primitive (prove knowledge of something without revealing it, and without a signature scheme) is what Parano1d applies to ownership.[](<github.com/cyberia-to/triden…>)
On volume: SafeTrade figures for both have been in a similar range recently (NOID often reported in the low-to-mid hundreds of thousands USD, Quantus similar or sometimes higher depending on the exact window). At various points NOID has shown stronger relative activity for its size, which is consistent with the observation that some early interest is going toward the proof-based model rather than a specific lattice signature scheme. Market cap around the $5M area matches what has been circulating in discussion.
Whether this makes it the clear long-term leader of the quantum-resistant race is still early — the security claims rest on the hash function, the proof composition, and the published resource analysis, all of which need ongoing scrutiny. But the architectural choice (signatureless ZK authorization + recursive present-proves-the-past + PoW ordering) is a distinct and concrete alternative to “pick the best PQ signature and bolt it on.” The five-line proof example shows how low the conceptual barrier can be once you stop treating digital signatures as the only primitive for authorization.
I was living through all crypto winters. I learned one spefic thing after the winter: the tech mature, nex gen bring more excitement and it feels like something new have been born and that is even more valuable when before.
My bets are quantum privacy ai - those are heavily converge.
Current leaders in ai: $NEAR, $SOL, $TAO, $PRL
Current leaders in privacy: $ZEC, $XMR, $ZAMA, $STRK
Quantum: #QRL, quantus, $NPT, $XNT, $XTZ being about resistance and qubitcoin is more about offense.
Hybrids for example $NOCK, and something like $NOID as a pure proof based thing or $NPT as the ultimate programable pq private moneys.
And if you would dig further the amount and qualities are unbilevalbe and self reinforcing loop will boost all of that further.
The wave is comming. I feel it.
Happy to live such a beaitful time.
the ledger story just got 10x worse
it's not just southeast asia anymore. the same spy chips were just found inside ledgers bought from mediamarkt in europe
two different store locations. same modification. antenna. LTE module. identical setup
these weren't returns. the store confirmed they came directly from the distributor
the distributor? aqipa gmbh. they supply over 1,000 stores across 11 european countries
this means the compromise is happening BEFORE the devices reach the shelves
you walk into a legit electronics store. buy a ledger off the shelf. sealed box. receipt and everything
and there's a spy chip inside it
first it was a compromised reseller in southeast asia
this is no longer an isolated incident. this is a supply chain crisis
That's the problem @cyberiacap intend to solve
master retweeted
Democracy: A Term That Has Outlived Its Use
The term "democracy" historically described a system where every citizen formally had an equal vote. Today, this principle faces a critical contradiction: mass participation without sufficient competence leads to ineffective governance.
In an era of complex technologies, global data flows, and new kinds of risks (AI, biotechnology, cybersecurity), blind equality of votes no longer works. Most participants lack the understanding needed to make decisions that impact the fate of society.
Modern challenges require adaptive governance structures. Here, democracy is no longer about equal votes: filters for competence, knowledge verification, and power distribution by functional domains become essential. We are moving toward new forms of governance — structured decentralization or meritocratic networks.
Conclusion: traditional democracy is outdated. Future civilizations and technological ecosystems need a new term that reflects intelligent distributed authority, where decisions depend on competence and systemic resilience.
💬 Question for readers: what would you call this new phenomenon? Share your suggestions in the comments — your term could become part of the future vocabulary of governance.
#FutureOfGovernance #Meritocracy #Decentralization #SmartGovernance #AdaptiveSystems #PostDemocracy
#dacc
master retweeted
If the Canary launch is set for November 5, how fast do you think the canary phase will wrap up given our current momentum? Also, what are the odds for the updated #bostrom to restore its liquidity?
#BOOT used to be an amazing asset back in the day.
#Cyberforever #cyb
🤖 Made with AI
unavailable
master retweeted
Replying to @cicada_farm
I am doubtful that 90 days would be enough to cleanup, stabilize and purify the codebase to launch CYB.
The deal is that:
1. Once launch it would be impossible to upgrade because it must upgrade itself from the cybergraph NOT relying on governance and some upgrade procedure. Just decision of self.
2. Due to completely encrypted state any bug would be catastrofic
3. So its better launch the thing that certainly works later rather than the thing that maybe works but fast.
















