"Professor Lederman ... goes on and on and on ... ." (Justice Jackson at oral argument in Trump v. U.S.) ConLaw Prof at the Georgetown University Law Center

Washington, DC
Joined August 2011
Marty Lederman retweeted
On Lawfare Daily, @S_R_Anders, @Claussen_K, @marty_lederman, and @petereharrell discussed the Supreme Court’s opinion which invalidated President Trump's IEEPA tariffs and looked ahead to the legal fights to come over the other tariff authorities the Trump administration is now using to pursue its agenda.
2
4
8
6,697
Yes!
Could not be more thrilled that Liz Magill will be Georgetown Law’s new dean! She is brilliant and kind and a person of deep integrity. @GeorgetownLaw is lucky to get her.
1
4
2,608
This is simply unadulterated, wonderful news for our school and our students. You'd be hard-pressed to find someone with greater integrity, creativity and thoughtfulness.
M. Elizabeth Magill, the former dean of Stanford Law School, provost of the University of Virginia and president of the University of Pennsylvania, has been named the executive vice president and dean of @GeorgetownLaw: bit.ly/4kFYVeS
4
7
51
12,404
Nuggets score 27 points in final 2:53 of OT. Jokic with 56/16/15. Ho hum.
2
1,665
Take this in. "[Admiral] Bradley ... affirmed having sought real-time legal advice, but that he did not say whether his military lawyer considered the survivors shipwrecked and out of the fight."
1
1
1,962
Has anyone mentioned that if only Kiner-Falefa had run through the plate rather than sliding--which presumably is what he's been taught to do--the Blue Jays would be world champions? Astonishing blunder--much worse than Buckner. And heartbreaking.
2
4
1,196
An alternative argument about why Trump lacks authority to deploy the National Guard in Chicago. supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/2…
2
3
9
1,357
Fourth and (for now) final part in my series about the birthright citizenship litigation, this one focusing on the statutory argument that might be the basis of the SCOTUS' ultimate decision when it rules on the petitions the SG filed on Friday. justsecurity.org/121397/birt…
1
1,046
I can scarcely imagine what it's like to be an operational enlistee or commander directed to comply with such a legally dubious order in this administration. A horrible position to be in. I tease it out a bit in this post.
To understand the enormous significance of the grave line the U.S. military crossed with the strike on the alleged Venezuelan drug boat A must-read, brilliant and careful analysis by @marty_lederman Article II, UCMJ, international and domestic law.
3
5
18
4,562
A user's guide to the legal questions raised by Trump's purported removal of Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve Board: balkin.blogspot.com/2025/08/…
1
2
7
1,232
A great, restorative show.
The Mekons @ Union Stage in Washington DC Sunday night July 20th, 2025.
3
1,504
This is really beautifully put, and so apt. These losses are simply incalculable. Thanks, Cass.
On Lloyd Weinreb, Dan Meltzer, and Dick Fallon. (Three beloved friends.) @WilliamBaude @lsolum @jacklgoldsmith casssunstein.substack.com/p/…
1,094
"Do you like to see professional golfers lose their shit? If the nine previous U.S. Opens contested at Oakmont are any indication, you are in for a treat this week." Over at the Ringer, I previewed 2025's harsh third major at one of golf's cruelest venues. theringer.com/2025/06/11/gol…
2
2
13
2,037
I agree with Nick that Sam's posts are invaluable, even if I don't share Sam's views in every particular. One important thing about today's argument: [1]
If you haven't been reading Sam Bray's series on universal injunctions over at @DividedArgument in preparation for Thursday's oral argument in the birthright citizenship case, you are doing it wrong. (Links below.)
1
2
1,990
I think Sam underestimates the extent to which the question of whether a universal injunction is necessary/useful to ensure complete relief to the parties themselves will be central to today's argument. [2]
1
668
Sam assumes that "in the cases before the Court, an injunction could protect some plaintiffs from executive action related to birthright citizenship ... without protecting anyone else." But that's far from clear, and that's why it'll be a big part of the argument today. [3]
1
635