@marksatter

Defense, national security & Congress @Politico | Signal: Mark.312 | [email protected]

Washington, DC
Joined July 2012
Today's my first day on the @politico defense team - covering the Pentagon, Hill and everything in between. [email protected] / Mark.312 on Signal. Tips always welcome.
Some personal news: today is my last day at CQ Roll Call. Later this month, I'll join the excellent defense team @politico. Grateful to everyone I've worked with over the past six (!) years, and the great reporters and editors @CQnow @rollcall. More tk!
2
8
1
94
25,338
Rep. Ashley Hinson (R-Iowa) on Monday expressed frustration over the ongoing war in Iran and its impact on Iowans’ pocketbooks, publicly distancing herself from President Donald Trump ahead of November’s rapidly approaching midterm elections. politico.com/live-updates/20…
1
1
2
435
Mark Satter retweeted
NEW: The presidential TV pool has been suspended as networks react to the White House's ongoing ban of CNN. That means, for now, that no major TV network will provide coverage of Trump's events, including today's appearances at the WH and his trip to the United Nations.
1,875
2,545
479
16,139
1,658,868
Mark Satter retweeted
109
412
14
2,354
60,022
Mark Satter retweeted
Rare instance of the Pentagon briefing room in action:
Last Thursday, we welcomed Logan and Jake Paul to the Pentagon to meet with our warriors.
2
10
1
144
31,677
Curtis: “You’ll hear more from me later on, this is a big deal.”
GOP Sen. John Curtis says of one of his "lows" for the week: "Believe this: A Russian oligarch paid for a lavish wedding after party for Donald Trump Jr. "It just stinks. It's corruption, I don't like it...this is a big deal."
2
8
2,062
NEW: The Iran war is estimated to have cost $43.6 billion since February, according to a DOD assessment circulated on the Hill this week and obtained by POLITICO. It's the clearest accounting thus far of the war and eclipses a previous CBO estimate of $38 billion.
1
25
1
61
6,272
🚨🚨 Sensitive F-35 technology was unexpectedly diverted to Hong Kong this summer, sparking a Hill inquiry and raising the possibility that China could have access to key fighter components. Great scoop from @audrey_decker9 and @marksatter politico.com/news/2026/09/18…
11
2
8
1,816
Mark Satter retweeted
Big scoop from @audrey_decker9 and @marksatter -- China may have stolen secrets about the F-35 after components were unexpectedly diverted to Hong Kong this summer: politico.com/news/2026/09/18…
6
66
11
102
19,018
Mark Satter retweeted
🚨🚨SCOOP: A shipment of F-35 fighter jet parts was rerouted to Hong Kong this summer — then vanished. Congress and DOD are investigating, amid the possibility that China may now have access to the highly-classified program. W/ @audrey_decker9 politico.com/news/2026/09/18…
898
4,659
1,414
15,570
3,712,820
🚨🚨SCOOP: A shipment of F-35 fighter jet parts was rerouted to Hong Kong this summer — then vanished. Congress and DOD are investigating, amid the possibility that China may now have access to the highly-classified program. W/ @audrey_decker9 politico.com/news/2026/09/18…
898
4,659
1,414
15,570
3,712,820
SCOOP: A shipment of F-35 parts, including a canopy, wound up in Hong Kong — sparking an investigation on Capitol Hill and raising the possibility that China could have access to key components of the highly-classified program. with @marksatter politico.com/news/2026/09/18…
65
306
111
1,096
652,754
We have a big story dropping in a few minutes 🚨
3
41
6,461
Mark Satter retweeted
New: In a letter to Rubio, Jeanne Shaheen, the top D on Senate Foreign Relations, says that US ambos in affected European countries are not being looped in on the NATO force posture review Calls on Rubio to make sure State Dept officials have a role reuters.com/world/us/democra…
1
22
6
57
36,210
Mark Satter retweeted
Some thoughts on the bipartisan passage of the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act. —Don’t expect sweeping new US sanctions. This legislation codifies into law fairly comprehensive sanctions that could have otherwise been lifted overnight, perhaps as part of a bad deal with Russia. That is its (enormous) value, because even if the admin issues temporary waivers, banks and companies that enforce sanctions know this is permanent US law. The risk of facilitating Russian sanctions evasion is much higher now. —The tariff provision is rightly controversial. But it is legally a lot more restrictive than many critics have suggested. And let’s be honest: The threat of 100% tariffs from Trump is a lot more credible and scary for Russia’s top five partners than the threat of a new complicated targeted sanctions strategy from Trump. It could actually change their behavior. They’ve had years to stop funding Russia’s brutal war, so zero sympathy. —Not passing this legislation, whatever shape it was in, would have broadcast appalling American weakness to the Kremlin and the world. —Everyone has a gripe with something about this bill while recognizing the importance of its objective. The negotiations and criticism that went into it were good for it. So a good night for US bipartisanship, as well as US policy towards both Russia and Ukraine. —I’m really proud that so many of our @HelsinkiComm Members led the push to get this done. 🇺🇸🤝🇺🇦
4
38
4
111
11,340
Pentagon is full steam ahead on AI. DoD officials insist a slowdown in AI development could cede ground to adversaries, and are dismissing calls from industry leaders and Congress to pause and better understand its long-term ramifications. from @LeoShane politico.com/news/2026/09/16…
3
6
5
11
2,887
New: Members of Congress and governors are under increasing pressure to regulate AI, but more than two dozen of them told us they don't use the technology or have rarely done so. Many are older, influential lawmakers. One House Democrat called it "f*cking absurd," arguing, "Anyone who's overseeing this has to be someone who's a regular user." w/ @AndrewSolender @StefWKight axios.com/2026/09/16/lawmake…
9
30
19
55
53,883
just a huge shift from Iowa GOP Rep. @millermeeks - who has voted since March to green-light the war in Iran and just broke with Trump to oppose it for the first time “…I will not vote to keep our soldiers in an open-ended war, with Iowans paying too much at the pump,” she says
I served 24 years in the Army. I said it in March: the mission had to stay focused and limited, because Americans do not want another forever war. I will not vote to keep our soldiers in an open-ended war, with Iowans paying too much at the pump. The Iranian regime and its nuclear ambitions have been defanged. The President needs to present a plan to Congress and the American people for how this ends so we can focus on bringing our soldiers home and lowering prices.
5
1
30
7,854