Mary Dobrski retweeted
‘The Whole Body Is Sick, and Ukraine is Simply Where the Abscess Burst’ -- Medinsky on Europe November 11, 2026.
NATO expansion was always part of the plan.
Clinton rejected the advice to stop turned NATO expansion into a race to the bottom---> the current conflict.
Former President Richard Nixon sent a letter to then-President Bill Clinton in March 1994, where he warned about chaotic Ukraine, “If it is allowed that (Ukraine) get out of control, it will make Bosnia look like a parent-teacher association (PTA) garden party."
Nixon supported the oligarch class, for sure. He rejected any policies that would prevent the looting of Russia even as he saw that Ukraine was disintegrating, but he was clear, don't let Ukraine get out of control.
Ukraine was collapsing economically and there was fear that the nuclear weapons were not secured.
Stephen Kinzer notes in his book Boiling Point that during Senate confirmation hearings, the future Secretary of State, Warren Christopher initially dodged the question of NATO expansion becoming a threat to Russia, just saying that it was “a very, very important and critical question for which I have no immediate answer.”
Clinton confidant and Russian speaker, Strobe Talbott officially guided the expansion of NATO. He was a special advisor to the Secretary of State on the New Independent States (1993-1994). He was in league with those who looted Russia under Yeltsin.
Partnership of Peace (P4P) was either "a holding room for members-in-waiting for NATO membership" or a supposed alternative to NATO expansion--- it was designed to dangle NATO membership in front of Warsaw Pact states while Russia was struggling after the disintegration of the USSR.
Clinton was the one who told Yeltsin that Russia had a pathway to become part of NATO under P4P.
Clinton told Ukraine that THEY could become part of NATO under P4P.
That was the carrot.
The Clinton administration was directly responsible for helping to turn NATO into a "world police force" and allowed NATO to begin moving East.
Cause-Effect.
The Congressional record stated about the Clinton administration: "This institutional transformation signals little strategic thinking.
NATO signals its intention to be an international police force and crisis manager by its internal transformation.The Administration refuses to establish parameters for how far NATO expansion will proceed. Where are the limits on NATO's mission and membership? Alliance cohesion is at risk."
Secretary of State Madeleine Albright was quoted in the Washington Post as saying that NATO should become a ``force for peace
from the Middle East to Central Africa'' (Washington Post, Feb. 22, 1998).
Clearly NATO needs to be ended and the US needs to stop meddling in Ukraine. There is no way the Ukraine-Russia conflict started in 2022.
‘The Whole Body Is Sick, and Ukraine is Simply Where the Abscess Burst’
Sources:
(NATO EXPANSION; Congressional Record Vol. 144, No. 90 (Senate - July 9, 1998))
Nixon letter (declassified as part of the latest round of declassification of documents available through the Clinton Presidential Library): wsj.com/public/resources/doc…
Strobe Talbott memo to Warren Christopher: nsarchive.gwu.edu/document/3…
🇺🇸🇺🇦🇩🇪The CIA ran Ukraine Nationalists since 1948!
This is the entire article from the Kyiv Post.
But this was the organization that overlapped with Reinhard Gehlen, "Hitler's Super Spy" who was in charge of German military intelligence on the Eastern Front during World War II and later was a founder of the Bundeswehr.
Scratch a....get a...
"Which Ukrainian Political Formation Was Supported by CIA During Cold War"
[Editor’s Note] The Ukrainian Supreme Liberation Council (UHVR) was formed in July 1944 in war-torn Ukraine uniting the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) and other Ukrainian patriots resisting the Nazis and Soviets. After a split in exile in the late 1940s within the OUN, the more liberal wing known as the “Dviykari” split from the followers of Stepan Bandera and retained the Extern Representation (ZP) of the UHVR. It drew support from many emigre Ukrainian intellectuals and was linked with the CIA-backed Prolog Corporation, based in New York, which published the influential pan-ideological magazine “Suchasnist.”]
In 1948, the CIA’s Office of Policy Coordination (OPC) selected the émigré organization Ukrainian Supreme Liberation Council (ZP/UHVR) as the “most reliable, best organized and operationally most experienced group for use in exploiting anti-Communist activity of the Ukrainian resistance group then active in Ukraine.” The CIA used various cryptonyms for its projects using ZP/UHVR, including QRDYNAMIC.
Below are excerpts from an August 1971 the CIA’s Covert Action division: “Memorandum for the Record.”
“SUBJECT: CIA Support of ZP/UHVR (Foreign Representation, Ukrainian Supreme Liberation Council)
“During the 1971 (CIA) headquarters review of Project QRDYNAMIC, which supports the ZP/UHVR, the logical question was raised whether the CIA is in fact supporting the "right group" of Ukrainian emigres in its efforts to encourage dissidence in Soviet Ukraine. The undersigned officer has attempted to examine the present status of the world Ukrainian emigre community, with the aid of QRDYNAMIC principal agents, in order to reach a conclusion in this respect.
“The political spectrum of the profusion of Ukrainian emigre political parties in the period following World War II is broad. The Ukrainian, for historical reasons, is a political animal and a compulsive organizer with very definite and vocal political views. His arch enemy is, as it has been for centuries, Russia, whether Tsarist or Soviet. The Ukrainian emigration is nationalistic and distinctive because it has traditionally maintained close contact with the homeland. The post-war Ukrainian emigration represented a virtual government in exile whose aim was to liberate Ukraine from Russian domination and establish an independent Ukrainian state. At present, most of the former influential military and civilian emigre leaders are dead or inactively retired. Some of the numerous political parties have become little more than social groups whose members nostalgically recall more vigorous and active days. The emigres also have many social, civic, and fraternal organizations which are of no interest
to us.
“The ZP/UHVR, in common with all emigre groups, had its share of internal strife in the 1940s and 1950s, but has stabilized remarkably since that time. From the days when it was an elite political advisory body to the Ukrainian underground movement fighting first the German Wehrmacht, and later the Soviet Army, its leaders have developed a political maturity that distinguishes it from other emigre political groups. Despite its title of "Ukrainian Supreme Liberation Council" the officers of the ZP/UHVR realistically have no illusions about promoting an internal revolt which could only result in senseless slaughter and extreme repression.
“Although supporting nationalist aims, they do so by promoting political liberalization and encouraging the cultural independence of Ukraine through free literary expression in Ukrainian, a highly developed Slavic language of which they are fiercely proud. The Soviets give lip service to the development of national languages such as Ukrainian, Byelorussian, Lithuanian, and Uzbek, but information from ZP/UHVR contacts inside Ukraine, and confirmed in part by other sources, indicates that in actual practice the Soviets are discouraging the use and spread of non-Russian languages. This fact challenges the ZP/UHVR to exfiltrate self-published dissident Ukrainian samvydav (Russian samizdat)
“It seems clear that if the CIA is interested in continued support of a political group that is energetically fighting Soviet repression of national minorities in the Soviet Union, the ZP/UHVR is our most effective vehicle.
“This serious and dedicated group of intellectuals has shown its appreciation for CIA support over the past twenty years by rendering the type of cooperation that has contributed
to our covert action as well as a positive intelligence mission against the Soviet Union.”
The CIA would continue its operational activities with ZP/UHVR until it terminated the project on 30 September 1990.
Richard Cummings
Richard H. Cummings was Director of Security, RFE/RL 1980-1995.
#Russia #Ukraine #CIA #RussiaUkraineWar #Germany
kyivpost.com/post/20541
Mary Dobrski retweeted
Who would have guessed that enabling, supporting, and carrying out genocide would make you unpopular?
Mary Dobrski retweeted
❗Nie chcę aby Polską rządzili Brytyjczycy,nie chcę aby w Polsce były amerykańskie bazy ,nie chcę aby Anglosasi decydowali z kim Polska ma zawiązywać sojusze i prowadzić interesy ,nie chce aby Anglosasi decydowali kto będzie szefem MSZ , nie chcę aby na stanowiskach rządowych byli ludzie z podwójnym lub potrójnym obywatelstwem ,nie chcę aby politycy polscy mieli jakiekolwiek własności poza naszym krajem , nie chcę aby obce korporacje i obcy kapitaliści decydowali o bezpieczeństwie Polski, nie chcę by po drogach Polski przemieszczali się żołnierze obcych armii a
nad niebem Polski operowali obcy nie polscy piloci ,nie chcę aby polskie złoto było przetrzymywane przez Anglosasów i tych amerykańskich i brytyjskich bo daje to im możliwość szantażu i wpływania na decyzję polskiego Sejmu ,nie chcę sojuszy z Brytyjczykami bo źle się one kończą dla obywateli polskich,nie chce aby na państwowych ,rządowych stanowiskach byli osadzani ludzie którzy kształcili się na zachodnich uczelniach
Украинские власти занимаются производством и распостранением наркотиков, печатью фальшивых денег, воруют деньги из бюджета, воруют деньги из западной помощи, похищают людей, устраивают пыточные, торгуют органами, торгуют детьми, заказные убийства в Европе, крышуют проституцию и колл-центры...это всё? Или я что-то упустил?
Mary Dobrski retweeted
Is Russia really wrong though? I’ll play devils advocate. They tried to join NATO and were denied entry. Why would Russia allow an alliance that is “against” them to set up that close to them? Would the USA allow Russia to place missiles in Cuba?
Mary Dobrski retweeted
I will not mention the name of the country, that will be for the Memoir, but I was asked to open an office there and stock it with women so a certain royal head of state could visit the office and pretend it was for economic advice. I declined, even though I would have received more than $10 billion to manage the office.
Mary Dobrski retweeted
Just as with Russia: blame everything on them, even our own doing. The Russians and the Chinese are so mighty and powerful, they can do anything under the sun, even manipulate us. Hence we gotta do one thing: Rearm and attack them to defend ourselves. That’s the whole logic.
This is shameless beyond belief.
The WSJ was one of the key papers pushing the spy story from day one (which now even the Office of the Director of National Intelligence says is "not entirely accurate and over-torqued", edition.cnn.com/2026/11/12/p…) and, along with other outlets, running one of the most blatant character assassination campaigns in modern corporate history.
And now that this campaign succeeded in pushing Jensen out, they survey the wreckage they helped create and write that "maybe that was China’s plan".
You couldn't make it up 🤦♂️
Mary Dobrski retweeted
Zelensky says there can be no peace without the EU at the table.
Merkel was asked why Minsk wasn't enforced. She said they never intended to honor it and were buying time for Ukraine to build an army.
Why would anyone who publicly admitted that be allowed back at the negotiating table?
Mary Dobrski retweeted
Los "negociadoraes europeos" haciendo cola. Desesperados por tener algo de voz en asuntos a los q no han sido invitados.Pq a nadie le importa lo q tengan q decir. Su misión es seguir arruinando a sus paises comprando armas y ayudando a un régimen nazi como se les ha ordenado. FIN
Mary Dobrski retweeted
Je crois qu'il est en descente de cc et que là il comprend que ça va mal se terminer...
Il ne va plus retourner en Ukraine, son peuple est contre lui. Il envoie maintenant des enfants de 14 ans au combat. Hitler faisait pareil à la fin en 1945 avec des enfants de 12 ans. Quand tu en es là, c’est plié!
Là il fait la tournée des pays ou il a planqué ses milliards pour voir qui refusera l'extradition vers l’Ukraine...
Ça sent le sapin, volo file un mauvais coton!
Son pote Manu dit le roi poudré sera bientôt contraint de faire pareil...
Ça sent la fin de règne pour ces deux affreux!
Il était temps, 2 millions de morts inutiles et 20% des territoires perdus, vivement 2027 qu'on en finisse...
😂😎😂
Mary Dobrski retweeted
Kaja is quoting Gromyko (!), saying that she must represent the EU and that Russians “don’t want her” 😂 in that position.
Actually, nobody wants her – not because she’s a strong negotiator, but because she’s stupid.
Not to mention, the EU hasn’t even been invited yet.
Mary Dobrski retweeted
Наркоман-пропагандист режиму Зеленського Петров агітує готувати дітей в школах до участі у війні, керуванні дронами, а також мобілізовувати жінок.
Сам же він ухиляється від мобілізації, а свою доньку вивіз до Польщі.
Mary Dobrski retweeted
Никто не звал ЕС на переговоры по Украине, заявил Медведев.
Он отметил, что Каллас не хотят там видеть не потому что она "жесткий переговорщик", а из-за того что она "глупая":
vk.cc/d3TKTg
Mary Dobrski retweeted
Не все понимают, в чем состоят условия ЕС на переговорах с Россией. Напомню, что он не меняются.
Россия, если пересказать эти условия простым языком, должна: уйти на границы 1991 года, вернуть похищенных ей детей, судить военных преступников и заплатить репарации. (последнее часто формулируется чуть косвенно)
Вот, например, резолюции Европейского совета (от 18–19 декабря 2025 года и 18–19 июня 2026 года). consilium.europa.eu/media/qx…
consilium.europa.eu/media/r1…
А вот недавняя пресс-конференция в Варшаве, от 6 ноября 2026 года, (Кая Каллас. Сикорский и Сибига) eeas.europa.eu/eeas/council-…
В обмен, по идее, Россия выполнит все эти условия, ЕС, тра-да-да-дам, - снимет с нее санкции. Решать, выполнила ли Россия эти условия, будет, судя по всему, тоже ЕС. То есть, например, если Россия выплатит 600 млрд репараций и будет их выплачивать 10 лет, то ничто не мешает на 11 год чиновникам ЕС сказать: а нам кажется, вы должны еще столько же! И никаких санкций не снять.
Понятно, что это не условия для переговоров. Это а) условия капитуляции и б) требование смены режима и, де-факто, расчленения России, потому что страна, капитулировавшая с бухты-барахты на таких условиях, вряд ли останется существовать.
Так же не совсем понятно, что грозит России в ответ. Если Россия не захочет соглашаться на капитуляцию, то что? ЕС не снимет санкции?
Возникает вопрос, зачем ЕС выдвигает такие требования. Тут два ответа. Один заключается в том, что ЕС правят какие-то злые гении, докторы Зло, которые под маской сострадания Украине готовы воевать до последнего украинца.
Другой заключается в том, что ЕС правит толпа воук-бюрократов, которые, как члены партии на собрании в 1937 году, являются заложниками риторики самых непримиримых, мелких и агрессивных членов ЕС.
Не знаю, какая из опций хуже.
Все остальное – это не требования. Это многократно озвученное ЕС предложение «остановите войну и приступите к выполнению наших требований». А то… а то что, собственно?
Mary Dobrski retweeted
A person who believes that Russia should be broken up into small pieces, and who thinks that Russia has no security concerns, is perhaps not the best choice to negotiate on security infrastructure—unless you’re an idiot.
Mary Dobrski retweeted
Russian “imperialist agenda” is the latest Western propaganda false talking point.
Russia has never invaded Europe.
It was in fact Europeans who’ve invaded and threatened Russia repeatedly.
Napoleon, Hitler, British and then USA through NATO.
#Ireland @MichealMartinTD @SimonHarrisTD @LeoVaradkar @MaryLouMcDonald
Mary Dobrski retweeted
Your "priority" is prolonging your holy proxy war on Russia - your unconditional "ceasefire" is Minsk 3, a ruse to rearm and regroup your flailing proxy. Which is why Russia will never agree.
The sequencing of Ukraine-Russia talks is important.
The priority should be securing a ceasefire, followed by a peace agreement, and only then can there be discussions on Europe's wider security architecture.
Shifting the focus to Europe’s security architecture is diverting the attention away from where it actually should be, which is stopping the killing in Ukraine.
So far, we don’t see any goodwill from Russia.
My remarks at the European Political Community in Dublin ↓



































