rl @ bandr • there is no greater danger than playing it safe

Joined December 2021
Pinned Tweet
The best part -> the spend was below $1
You can literally post-train a 4B model to judge your agent better than Jev and better than a 763B model open-source code, data, training setup, evals, everything dropping soon!!
2
1
10
1,180
i used to pray for days like these
had so much traffic, it went down now back again :D
1
2
99
we built Edgecase to turn expert decisions into reusable training recipes. it learns what makes a decision correct, varies the situation and checks whether the new answer holds up. live today. Code + recipe are open source :)
your agent's traces only cover what already broke. synthetic data should not imitate them it should extrapolate and generate the failures that haven't happened yet. early results on real production failure diagnosis: - trained on ZERO real traces, it matches a model trained on real expert traces (82% vs 82%) - few-shot post-training stops being a lottery (every run 80–86%) - the model sees failure types no expert ever labelled introducing edgecase🐵a platform to extrapolate your agent's traces into training data. recipe and code are fully open source.
1
6
172
ManIT retweeted
every team post-training agents has at most a handful of labelled traces, which they also use for eval. nobody has thousands and the few you have only show the failures you have already seen. so most synthetic data just remixes them. more of the same. we went the other way:- extrapolate from your traces and generate the failures that haven't happened yet. then we trained a model on zero real traces and put it head to head with one trained on real expert data. the result surprised us. launching tomorrow. open source + live on the platform 🐒
4
3
23
621
imitation gets you to the average expert. extrapolation gets you to the edge case. imitation = rewrite your few expert-labelled traces. more of the same. extrapolation = generate the failures that haven't happened yet. we trained on zero real traces and put it head to head with real expert data. result surprised us. open source + live tomorrow 🐒
1
5
373
lowk cooked with the name
getting the guy behind jev to say "help step-jev" was not on my bingo card 😭
1
3
66
tbh was named with good faith
15
we’re so back (the reward was never stuck)
Help Step-Jev, my reward is stuck (plateauing) 🥵
1
3
69
context -> diogo(jev creator) reposted our stepjev tweet
1
22
"machine autonomy emerges not from data abundance but from strategic curation of high-quality agentic demonstrations" same way taste works. you don't build it from doing everything, you get it from doing few high priority things and execute those really well
1
5
90
absolutely love the framing of the paper -> arxiv.org/pdf/2509.17567
2
21
we gave the agent an AI judge and it learned to do performative research instead of actually doing research the judge loved it tho 😭
🤖 Made with AI
Excited to release Step-Jev 🔥 step-by-step rewards for agent RL, even when there’s no answer key After DeepSeek R1, everyone said step rewards get hacked, so just reward the final answer. We found the opposite. With an AI judge grading only the final answer, our agent learned to fool it and accuracy dropped every single update until it was worse than no training at all. Step rewards fixed it. Everything is open!
1
1
1
5
268
been tinkering with this for a while now, would love your thoughts on the results @chem_safety @danielrupawalla @ypatil125
46
damn so claude science is really an RLM, honestly makes sense. does this mean the next step is RLM+CLM ? @RulinShao @a1zhang
AI Engineer at Anthropic just exposed Claude Science is an RLM 🚨 @a1zhang @willcb @lateinteraction
1
2
111
the goat gave his thoughts xitter.cf/a1zhang/status/2105409…
few thoughts, I've been sent this paper many times today, and it's cool! 1. it's a v clever idea, and I'd say even more extreme than RLMs on the spectrum of ReAct-style vs. pure context offloading (so no they're not the same) 2. im hopeful to see harness designs that use this principle, and they somewhat go hand-in-hand with model + RLM progress as well 3. the KV issues scare me admittedly, and the proposed fix is a bit hacky despite it seeming to work well for their results. that being said, I suspect different model shapes won't have this issue, so it's fixable! another + for this direction
2
36
I think that the function of making it for any startup is truly connected to how fast they adapt to what they see + hypothesize about what will happen in the coming few months
1
62
Introducing Noma: an open decision model. State in. Calibrated answer out. No generated text. 16 ms per decision ~40x faster than Jev $0.023 per 1,000 decisions 100% on JevBench easy Open weights, MPL-2.0. pip install blackdrome-noma
1
3
5
80
ngl the part that got me wasn’t even beating jev we trained it on another verifier’s labels and it basically learnt the judgement itself feels kinda stupid to keep paying a huge model to make the same decision forever once you have enough traces lol
Releasing Your Own Jev Post-train a 4B/8B/27B judge on your agent's traces. It beats Jev. 79.7% agreement with human labels vs Jev's 66.3% Beats DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (763B) by 14 points 0.13s per step on a single GPU Completely open source: recipe, data, training, evals
2
2
7
483
@madiator, @denisyarats , @ShrivuShankar, ,@hwchase17 would love your feedback on this
2
70
Is there no true universal parser for all agent trajectories out there? Infact there probably isn't even a standard everybody truely stick to while logging.
2
3
178
Need this to be standardized asap
1
38