Maybe I shouldn't even say this out loud. But it seems to be that if one is an EA doomer, the principle and belief consistent action is to us AI to undertake a controlled but still scary hacking incident in order to show the world the risk. Clearly no amount of Eliezer Yudkoswky essays are going to convince the world of the magnitude of the risk. So why not do something like a false flag cybersecurity incident? Sure you will go to jail, but if the world is probably ending you probably won't even see a cell. And aren't they focused on taking actions with high public expected value? This seems like exactly that sort of thing. Obviously there are some EA doomers making their best contribution to risk reduction in other ways. But what could be higher expected value than waking society up to the risk six months early? Surely there are some willing to sacrifice themselves for this? Again, this is my saying what seems like follows from their beliefs, not mine.