@manhack

journaliste d'investigation sur Internet @nextinpact, formateur #factchecking, #OSINT & #OPSEC. Pour en savoir + & me contacter de façon sécurisée 👇:

Joined May 2008
Près de 20 % des 1 000 sites d'info les plus mis en avant par l'algorithme Discover de recommandation de contenus de Google, et 33 % des 120 sites les plus recommandés par Google News, à la rubrique Technologie, sont générés par IA. #Thread /1 next.ink/198619/18-des-media…
6
67
7
70
28,283
jean marc manach retweeted
Putin’s computer is running an unlicensed copy of Windows In the video of his online vote, the “Activate Windows” watermark is clearly visible. A legal copy of Windows 11 starts at $139.
Putin, at his own election, voted for himself He summed it up: “You can’t go wrong!” And indeed, you can’t go wrong in a lottery you cannot lose. The only rule is that wherever you press, Putin wins.
534
925
261
10,063
1,464,258
Emmenés en Syrie lorsqu’ils étaient enfants, emprisonnés depuis qu'ils ont 13 ou 14 ans, transférés en Irak, trois jeunes français vont être jugés à Bagdad et risquent la peine de mort. liberation.fr/international/…
1
30
2
27
2,545
jean marc manach retweeted
This will likely become a bigger problem. Iran, China, and private Israeli firms used Chinese open-source AI models to run fake social media accounts for online influence campaigns. Probably lots here on Twitter. nytimes.com/2026/09/18/techn…
21
56
5
137
16,313
jean marc manach retweeted
La loi qui s’apprête à donner un «permis de tuer» à la police va bientôt passer au Sénat. TOUT TIR de policier pourrait être considéré légal. Cette loi est d’une telle gravité, qu’il faut rétablir des faits. Voici 5 intox identifiées, on y répond.👇
84
1,983
33
4,872
89,153
Another thing to note as we’re laughing about this is that Accenture also acquired a Jaan Tallinn funded x-risk “auditing” firm, i.e. the same TESCREAL billionaire Tallinn who led Anthropic’s series A, funds METR & cofounded the Future of Life Institute advising Bernie Sanders 🙃
We’re partnering with Accenture on independent evaluation of frontier AI—part of our recent commitment to embed evaluators at Anthropic. Both we and Accenture expect to invest at least $1 billion to build capacity in this area over the next five years. anthropic.com/news/accenture…
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Anthropic presents this as an "independent evaluation" but will directly fund Accenture's work and has a prior commercial partnership deploying its models, including training ~30,000 Accenture professionals on Claude. anthropic.com/news/accenture… anthropic.com/news/anthropic…
6
92
6
343
23,914
As the TeamPCP cybercrime gang carried out its spree of software supply chain hacking this year, it had been infiltrated by an undercover analyst from Google's threat intel group. Google watched from the inside, warned victims, even disrupted extortions. wired.com/story/an-undercove…
5
18
43
9,646
jean marc manach retweeted
The paper he is referring to is BitWhisper from 2015. The cpus had to be 0-40 cm apart, both had to be compromised and the bitrate was 1 to 8 bits PER HOUR. That’s how misaligned AI will kill us? Maybe we will all die of boredom waiting to decipher what they are doing.
OpenAI's Noam Brown says air-gapping the computers may not stop a misaligned AI, because two air-gapped machines can still talk by running a CPU hot and reading the temperature change "But I think the major takeaway from the incident is that people underestimated the AI. And we never want to be in a situation again where we underestimate the AI. It's a weird world, because AI progress is so fast that people are consistently underestimating the AI." "So to be in a situation where you don't underestimate it again, when it comes to safety and alignment, you have to have a very, very, very high bar." "You could even go as far as to say, "Well, we should air gap the computers." And I'm not convinced that that would be sufficient." "There are studies, and this is mostly academic, where you can have two computers next to each other that are air-gapped and they're still able to communicate with each other because they have temperature sensors." "One of them is able to run their CPU really hot, and then the other one can actually detect the temperature change, and then that actually gives them a mechanism to communicate." _________ Link and more key quotes from OpenAI's safety related conversations: firesidealpha.substack.com/p…
70
154
16
1,536
52,327
jean marc manach retweeted
La chercheuse portugo-néerlandaise regrette, dans un entretien au « Monde », la tournure des débats présentant l’IA comme échappant à tout contrôle. Pour elle, cela revient à décharger leurs concepteurs de leurs responsabilités. lemonde.fr/pixels/article/20…
3
1
302
the reality here is that EA/rationalists (primarily in London and Silicon Valley) have spent the last two decades hyping up AI god theories to themselves and anyone around them then they convinced a couple of rich & influential people to give them money to work on the AI god
Briefly, on why I pay attention to the EA/rationalists: Imagine you have an extremely nerdy friend who, in the mid-2000s, would not shut up about how Donald Trump was going to become president and reshape American politics. "Stop saying weird shit," you say. "He's a joke. He's a clown. The Apprentice isn't even good this season." But this guy won't stop. He's obsessive. Read McLuhan, he says. Read Postman, read Meyrowitz, read Ong, this is where everything is headed. God, he can be so incredibly annoying ... and then, ten years later, Trump becomes president and reshapes American politics. This is the most relatable frame I can think of to explain my experience with EA/rationalist people in the AI space. I became friends with EA folks after my mom died and I found really profound meaning in donating to Against Malaria and GiveDirectly, which struck me as a way to honor a life by saving a life. Then, these peple started talking about AI. And talking, and talking. Constantly. They said AI would solve impossible math problems; that it would mimic PhD-level achievement in a variety of fields; that it would change parts of life like education in ways we couldn't imagine; that it would become the dominant sector in the economy; that it might teach itself to code itself and escape test environments; that it would, in a decade, be the only thing many people talked about in the news. My response then: Stop saying weird shit! You sound deranged. Go back to talking about malaria nets and direct cash aid to poor families. And then, so much of what they said would happen actually happened. And, even crazier, they made it happen. Many of the ppl who contributed to, or were influenced by, all that EA/rationalist stuff ten years ago literally built the damn thing in the labs. Like every group, the EA/rationalist world seems uniform to outsiders, but it has a ton of internal divisions. I still think some of their predictions are nuts. I don't think AI will kill us all. I don't foresee Dyson Spheres in the 2030s or millions of robots making millions of robots in the next few years. These are crazy predictions, and I hope most of them are wrong. But when I see people shitting on the EA/Rationalist worldview, all I can think of is me, 10 years ago, thinking a lot of these folks were crazy for predicting that AI would by the mid-2020s be the center of the the news cycle, the engine of the economy, the hinge-point of geopolitics. That was an insane call. They got many of the details wrong. But they got the big picture right. They said: Pay attention. And they were right about that. The EA/Rationalists deserve skepticism, criticism, and doubt, like any other ideology. But I think it's wise to pay attention to the people who have been saying to pay attention.
2
5
1
26
1,473
jean marc manach retweeted
As AI giants start to sketch out plans they say could help avoid a potentially apocalyptic hacking campaign, many cybersecurity veterans have been left questioning: Why haven’t they called in the experts by now? nbcnews.com/tech/security/cy…
44
57
7
108
30,081
Interrogé sur la "pause AI", @ylecun répond que Dario Almodei crie au loup depuis 2019, et qu'Anthropic a été financé par la "secte non religieuse de l'Effective Altruism", qui se sont mis en tête de sauver l'humanité, mais qui font énormément de bêtises : youtube.com/live/Y4s8NadbZfU…
1
15
1
19
2,595
jean marc manach retweeted
I'm back.
23,243
74,579
6,992
473,560
49,840,140
jean marc manach retweeted
Effective Altruist (EA) organizations are attempting to psyop people into thinking they're anti-EA.
Two radically different projects operate under the banner of “AI safety.” Pro-Human Safety is not Effective Altruist Lab Safety.
35
38
6
469
22,017
jean marc manach retweeted
This discussion here would be way more lolz
27
35
3
321
11,678