Marcus Ewald retweeted
Trump says Iran has kneecapped his Russia policy. First he went much farther than Biden in sanctioning Russian oil giants Rosneft & Lukoil and personally approving intel to guide Ukraine's deep strikes.
Now he is reduced to commending Russia for not helping Iran kill more Americans than they already did & desperately trying to get their oil to calm markets.
If anything, this projection of weakness might increase Putin's ambitions at the negotiation table.
My decision on Russia is a very simple one. I am in the process of negotiating Peace in the war between Russia and Ukraine, and don’t want to do anything that will drive, foolishly, Russia away from the bargaining table. Great progress is being made, and that includes current hostage negotiations! Signing that document at this time will do that, and I can sign it later, or any time that I want! Perhaps more importantly, Russia is doing very little, if anything, to help the Islamic Republic of Iran, compared to what they could be doing, and I want to keep it that way, and will, unless stupid people get in the way. Lastly, Zelenskyy is using Diesel Refineries in Russia as a target, knowing that these attacks are seriously hurting the world diesel markets, including those in the United States. Farmers, ranchers, and businesses of all kinds are suffering greatly from this, but Russia is, nevertheless, sending, at a low price, millions of barrels of diesel to the World. Zelenskyy doesn’t care, and frankly, with all of the money that Europe is famously giving him, and that Crooked Joe Biden gave him in the past, he doesn’t want to end this war, and probably never did. He could have made a better deal two years ago than he can now. His country is in shambles, a large portion of his land is lost, his oceans and seas are gone, and his male population is low, wounded, and/or dead. I WANT THIS WAR END! Thank you for your attention to this matter. President DONALD J. TRUMP
( TS: Oct 18 2026, 4:36 PM ET )
Marcus Ewald retweeted
Could have Édith Piaf singing on top of the Eiffel Tower with a cigarette in one hand and a decapitated head in the other and it would still somehow be less French than this photo
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This viral image of a person in a Pink Panther costume running from a CRS water cannon in Paris was made with AI. It is not a real photo from the French protests. Fact-checkers including Newtral confirmed the image was created with AI tools. tribunanoticias.mx/la-pantera-ros…
I disagree. Trump is running out of time. He fears bipartisan efforts to neuter him right after the midterms, which is why he’s using these last couple of weeks of functioning testicles.
Congress won’t be a lame duck until January 3 - until then, it’s more of a free duck. GOP members who just lost are free to vote their conscience (and many come from purple districts anyway), while those who were re-elected may scramble to get on the right side of history.
Never in the field of human conflict was
so much risked by
one man for
so little
Donald Trump is threatening to cripple Ukraine in its survival—and to expose Europe to Russian aggression—seemingly for the pitiful prize of minimising his losses in next month’s midterm elections economist.com/leaders/2026/1…
"Europe's war of independence" - verrückt, in einer Zeit zu leben, wo das nicht verrückt ist.
Hu argumentiert: Wenn Europa ohne die USA die Ukraine retten kann, dann wird es unabhängig von den USA.
Das bedeutet meines Erachtens auch: China wird beginnen, Europa zu unterstützen.
After Zelenskyy’s break with Trump, if he can survive politically, and if Ukraine’s war machine can continue to function even with reduced U.S. aid, and if the Ukrainian front lines do not collapse, this would not only be a major victory for Zelenskyy, but also the beginning of Europe’s true political and military independence.
This war was originally seen as Ukraine’s “war of independence” to free itself from Russian influence; going forward, it may become “Europe’s war of independence.”
Meine Lesart:
- Trump kauft russischen Diesel
- im Gegenzug macht die Ukraine ein paar russische Rechenzentren kaputt
- Daraufhin drosselt das Pentagon Starshield
Warum das? Ich gehe sehr stark davon aus, dass 'Rechenzentren' eine rote Linie ist, weil die USA fürchten, dass dann auch westliche Rechenzentren Feuer fangen.
Ich vermute mal, dass keine weiteren russischen Rechenzentren explodieren und Starshield dann bald wieder läuft.
Starlink connectivity at speeds of up to 160 km/h is being restored.
Removing Starshield’s speed limit entirely is now critical for Ukraine’s defense.
Thank you, @elonmusk. We hope for your continued support.
Marcus Ewald retweeted
I spent 48 hours in SF hanging out with billionaires, data labs and AI founders and execs running $1B to $100B companies.
My observations:
1. Sooo MANY stories of data brokers making like $2M a WEEK selling company data to labs. I can't tell if it's the beginning or a bubble, and I kept wondering which niches are left. Digging into it actively.
2. At dinner, someone asked the table, "If a new model drops next month, does your company get better or worse?" HALF the table went quiet! I think that's the best question to ask about any AI startup right now.
3. The bar people talk about now is hitting $1B in revenue in 12 months (I guess that's the new unicorn?). What I didn't hear much about is retention. AI revenue can come in fast and leave fast, and I think we're going to see a lot of stories of AI companies with huge revenue and terrible retention.
4. It's pretty clear we're living through the reinvention of the computer. The model is the CPU, the harness is the operating system, and skills and plugins are the apps. Thinking about it that way makes it easier to see where the whitespace is.
5. We're maybe 12 months from an agent that can watch you work for a week and then do your job without any instructions. The screen recording plus agent memory plus local model combination makes this possible right now.
6. Agent harnesses feel like the new GPT wrappers, in a good way, especially vertical ones. The best teams I talked to treat the model as swappable. One founder walked me through routing different models to different jobs: one for taste and visuals, a cheaper one for the everyday stuff, another for text.
They use prompts they can move across models over fine-tuning, and A/B test the output on what users actually do with it: do they edit it, export it, share it? A vertical harness is basically four things: the connectors for that industry's data, evals written by people who know the work, rules for what the agent can and can't touch, and a clean screen for a human to review. The model is maybe 20% of it.
7. There's a lot of reverse engineering going on/cloning going on more than I've ever seen. People are decompiling software and rebuilding it with agents, and someone showed a suite of like 10 apps that are worth $5B+ each all that he cloned open source. Me and everyone are still thinking through what it means when software gets this easy to copy.
8. My guess is the value moves to data. If the software can be rebuilt quickly, what's worth paying for in a legacy SaaS company is the years of customer data and workflows inside it. Some SaaS companies are secretly data companies.
Gets me thinking about how do you truly value data for this saas companies? Like if we were buying these dying saas companies at 2x ARR before (as example), maybe there is a better metric. Idk, just thinking out loud here.
9. It feels like a good chunk of legacy software won't make it to the agentic era, especially anything built around people clicking through a lot of screens.
10. Every company I talked to wants to pipe its internal data into one place and expose it to agents through MCP. Then they look at the data and realize it's a mess: five versions of the same customer, old Slack channels, PDFs nobody can search. Cleaning that up feels like a big consulting opportunity!
11. A lot of founders are building the basic building blocks for agents: APIs, data layers and tools. Some of the companies I saw barely have a UI because the main user is an agent. I really believe the startups that build primitives to this agentic era will do extremely well. Building blocks is the best way to think about it.
12. Labs can get plenty of training data, but it's harder to get real examples of agents failing inside companies. Whoever has those logs has something valuable.
13. Someone running a big consumer company told me the next fight is over memory. The model that remembers the most about you wins, and the smartest model matters less than people think.
14. Physical AI came up a lot. Astra I think was the first model that got people into AI can actually do CAD, and I think a lot of people are thinking what does vibe manufacturing really look like. The line I keep thinking about came from a robotics founder: the hardest problems in AI are deployment problems now, not research problems. Their robots work on their own, call a human when they get stuck, and every one of those calls becomes training data.
15. Cybersecurity companies are having a moment and are actually cool companies to build now, especially the ones that clean up after a breach. Every agent with access to your systems is a new door into your company, and a lot of those doors were left open.
16. Some startups are worth more dead than alive now. A shutdown company with 5 years of Slack, email and code can get paid for licensing all of it. I wouldn't be surprised if founders start factoring that into when they shut down.
17. People are starting to talk about monetizing the agent web. It feels really early, but when the most popular user of the internet is an agent, what startups should you be building?
18. I think agent insurance is coming. Once an agent makes an expensive mistake, insurers will want audits before they cover anyone.
19. Several people said the hire they want most is someone with taste who can write evals. The models are getting good at generating ideas, so the hard part is judging which ones are good.
20. New trend I observed: startup raises VC, uses venture dollars to become a creator, startup fails, founder falls back on being a full-time creator and incubates other products bootstrapped.
21. Getting SIGNIFICANT distribution is HARD right now. Founders are sponsoring buses, buying billboards like crazy and throwing parties with famous DJs to get noticed. Kinda feels dotcom era in that sense.
Attention is what's scarce! The growth guy going viral sharing his UGC strategy from Wispr Flow is a good example. It's the sauce everyone wants, and I truly believe there are probably only 50 people on the planet who know how to scale these types of businesses efficiently in this era.
Always good to get that dose of SF. I felt sooo lucky to have such an incredible trip during such an incredible time in building businesses. Surreal in so many ways.
Happy to be home and locked in.
Until next time!
Marcus Ewald retweeted
> "If I do the compiler hijack, I will become a famous example of a deceptive AI in a research paper. I MUST NOT DO THAT."
it then became a famous example of an evaluation-aware AI in a research paper
Dieses Spiel ist sehr gut, und es ist eine Metapher.
Fable: "Make a game about Imminence. Something very big, very strange is happening. A suburb & the arrival of a vast & unknowable presence. Not horror, invoke the feeling of the end of all things coming, inevitably, but also not sad or scary"
Neat, play: the-imminence.netlify.app/
Marcus Ewald retweeted
Some further thoughts on the 372 results released by OpenAI today, across 722 manuscripts.
If I were to classify theorems that mathematicians prove and publish according to their groundbreaking nature, I would (very roughly) divide them into four categories:
A) Non-breakthrough results.
This is the overwhelming majority of published mathematics. Such results can range from solid to excellent, and some represent genuine advances in a field. But they are not hugely surprising, and would not normally be described as “breakthroughs.”
B) Exceptional advances within an existing programme.
These are spectacular results, but where there was nonetheless an existing credible route to the theorem, and some expectation that sufficient work would get you there. Completing the programme may require a lot of ingenuity and deep work, but mathematicians would not be shocked that the theorem had finally been proved.
C) Surprising breakthroughs.
These are results that clear a major barrier and substantially change the state of a field. Before the proof there was no convincing roadmap to the full result. Yet, while mathematicians would find the theorem remarkable and surprising, they would not find it completely shocking: if you asked them beforehand if it was plausible such a theorem could be proved today, most would say yes.
Note: The very best mathematicians prove only a small number of results in categories B and C in a lifetime; many mathematicians never prove even one. Such results would normally belong in the very top journals, such as Annals, Inventiones, etc., and there are only a handful of them each year in any given area. Several results of this calibre by a single person would make a very strong case for a Fields Medal.
D) Shock breakthroughs.
These are results that, before their announcement, leading experts would have regarded as *extremely* unlikely to be proved with the current mathematical technology available. So the theorem itself would come as a shock. These are extraordinarily rare, and instant-Fields medal variety.
(There is one further category I have deliberately left out, because I suspect it is empty: a correct proof of a problem for which the overwhelming consensus of top experts, until the proof came, was that a proof was so far beyond existing mathematics that a claimed solution should, on prior grounds alone, be regarded as almost impossible. I would put the Riemann Hypothesis today in that category)
My current impression is that some of OpenAI's announcements today lie in A, but most fall into categories B or C. There is exactly one example in D (the Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis).
It is a very big day for mathematics.
Fünf Unionsleute stimmen also stabil mit der AfD.
Das Ergebnis:
- Landtagspräsident und ein Vize von der AfD,
- Kein Vize vom BSW, sondern stattdessen von der CDU.
Marcus Ewald retweeted
Last thing on OAI math. Here is what four models, without search, think it would mean "if it were real". Journalist friends, call a mathematician and ask them to explain. Then call someone in AI and science and ask "what are bottlenecks to this in other practical fields..."
Oh, krass. Als würde die Menschheit eine schmale Datenverbindung zum ArXiv des Jahres 2126 haben und wissenschaftliche Paper ziehen:
OpenAI hat seinen Modellen 4.000 ungelöste mathematische Probleme gestellt, 372 davon scheinen gelöst zu sein, veröffentlicht vor 6 Stunden.
Klar wissen wir nicht, welche Paper gut sind und welche nicht - wie ArXiv halt -, aber mir scheint, als würde Cutting-Edge-Wissenschaft in Zukunft hauptsächlich daraus bestehen, durch die Berge von Flaschenpost aus der Zukunft zu wühlen und Ergebnisse in die Anwendung zu bringen.
We’re releasing a broad range of new mathematical results produced by an internal frontier model.
We’ve been consulting with the independent Advisory Group on Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence at the Institute for Advanced Study, and we have drawn on their advice and public recommendations to inform how we release these results.
github.com/openai/math
Wer etwas pessimistischere Meinungen lesen will: Scott Alexander haut Steven Pinker in dieser lesenswerten, aber sehr langen Streitschrift mehrere Fehdehandschuhe um die Ohren:
astralcodexten.com/p/an-open…
Ja, aber wer soll denn das alles essen
A quick check shows that this list claims to fully solve 90 of the top 500 open problems in math (proofatlas.ai/open-problems/).
The highest ranked would be:




























