Flavs retweeted
“The final test of freedom is this: Can you remain the same person in praise, in insult, in gain, and in loss?”
- Seneca
Ordered by Emperor Nero to take his own life in 65 AD, the Roman philosopher Seneca faced death with remarkable composure. After opening his veins, he reportedly entered a warm bath as grieving friends and followers gathered around him. The artwork portrays this solemn scene, contrasting Seneca’s calm acceptance of his fate with the sorrow of those witnessing his final moments.
His death reflects a central principle of Stoic philosophy: true strength comes from mastering one’s character rather than controlling external circumstances. Whether confronted with praise, criticism, triumph, suffering, or even death, Seneca believed that inner peace and personal integrity should remain unshaken.
Flavs retweeted
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
Michigan's Democratic candidate for Senate Abdul El-Sayed confronted @jamesmatthewsky, telling him he wouldn't answer his questions as he wants "zero" votes in the UK.
Watch the heated exchange between the two.
Watch our live coverage of the US midterms➡️ trib.al/BikRSb2
Michigan's Democratic candidate for Senate Abdul El-Sayed confronted @jamesmatthewsky, telling him he wouldn't answer his questions as he wants "zero" votes in the UK.
Watch the heated exchange between the two.
Watch our live coverage of the US midterms➡️ trib.al/BikRSb2
Flavs retweeted
At what point do we stop focusing on who needs to pay more tax and start asking where all of our tax money is going.
Flavs retweeted
Delighted with my first few weeks at John Lewis. And they said I wouldn't get another job after I left Jaguar's Marketing Department...
Flavs retweeted
🇩🇪 Le président allemand Steinmeier, kippa sur la tête, dénonce l’antisémitisme qui se cache derrière la critique d’Israël.
« La haine des Juifs se déguise en critique d’Israël. Nier son droit à exister, c’est franchir la ligne de l’antisémitisme. »
Des mots clairs !
Flavs retweeted
Before I die, I’m going to eat a bag of unpopped popcorn.
That should make the cremation a little more interesting.
Flavs retweeted
In this alternative reality, the opposition leader who is out of power fleeing into exile, and the father who is in prison are the authoritarians. And the guy who controls all security forces of the state, the electoral system, and largely the media through state subsidies, and who ordered a travel ban on his opponent within seven minutes of being declared the winner of the presidential election after having his former lawyer acting as judge extend the closure of the polls and suspend the counting for two hours is the democratic man representing the will of the people.
Please follow @AOC for more daily comedy and satire.
Yesterday, Brazil showed the world that the will of the people is stronger than the authoritarians who try to suppress it. Congratulations President @LulaOficial and congratulations Brazil.
Flavs retweeted
-Etre Lula.
- Se faire condamner pour corruption.
- Se faire condamner à 12 ans
- Se faire libérer par le STF pour vices de procédure.
-Jamais réellement acquitté lmao.
- Battre Jair Bolsonaro en 2022.
- Jair se fait jeter en taule pour un prétendu coup d'État.
- Le Congrès vote pour réduire sa peine.
- Lula y met son veto.
- 4 ans plus tard, affronter son fils.
- Pendant un débat, menacer de l'enfermer lui aussi s'il perd l'élection.
- Jour des élections
- Ancien avocat privé, désormais juge au STF, prolonge le vote de 2 heures à l'échelle nationale.
- La demande venait de la coalition de Lula elle-même.
- Gagner de 4 millions de voix au second tour sans trace papier.
- Le lendemain, Moraes ordonne au candidat perdant de remettre ses passeports.
- Discours de victoire : « on va réguler les réseaux sociaux »
- « démocratie » lmao
- RIP Brésil
Dictature en place !!!
Flavs retweeted
Timeline in Brazil's election:
1) Polls opened at 8:00 a.m, to close at 5:00 p.m.
2) Left-wing President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva was interviewed at 1:00 p.m., clearly distraught at how the election was unfolding.
3) Supreme Court Justice Cristiano Zanin extended the vote time two additional hours at exactly 4:57 p.m...three(3) minutes before polling was to close. Very important context is that Justice Zanin is President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's personal attorney. Additionally, it is the first time in Brazil's history that an election has been extended. Additionally, many of the smaller precincts didn't get the message until they were already closed. This heavily, heavily benefited the sitting president as with all leftists, his concentration of voters are in urban areas. Precincts favorable to the president stayed open while they allowed those favorable to the opposition to close before communicating that vote times had been extended.
Certainly nothing sketchy there. 👍
4) Vote publications were halted at 5:20 p.m. and brought back online at 7:00 p.m.
Now where have we seen that before?
5) President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is declared the winner at 9:10 p.m.
*Nothing to see here folks. Move along, nothing to see here.
Flavs retweeted
Honestly, I couldn't care less about Brazilian politics.
But I find it interesting to note how my former college professors equate democracy with a victory for the left. In other words, if the left loses, it's not democracy.
Homeschool your children.
Flavs retweeted
Yesterday, Lula ostensibly became the first person since Brazil's return to democracy to win a fourth term in office. This is just three weeks after the country elected its most right wing legislature ever.
It was the first time a candidate has lost the first round and gone on to win the presidency, and the first time that turnout in the second round has exceeded turnout in the first.
Also unprecedented was the Supreme Court's last minute extension of voting hours. That decision was made by key Lula ally Alexandre de Moraes, who has now seized the passport of Lula's opponent after imprisoning his predecessor.
British media's response to all of this? Bovine silence. Brazil is a famously corrupt country. Honesty should not be the expectation. It may be that Lula's victory was legitimate: it is certainly not obvious that it was. How will we know if nobody asks the questions?
Remember this disinterest the next time that you hear a British journalist tell you about the importance of their role in 'protecting democracy' and 'speaking truth to power'. They have zero interest in either objective, and we should take zero notice of their words.
Flavs retweeted
RIO DE JANEIRO - Desempenho do Lula
1º turno: 3.693.021 votos
2º turno: 4.565.393 votos
Diferença: +872.372 votos
Abstenção 1º turno: 2.997.846 eleitores (23,32%)
Abstenção 2º turno: 2.780.077 eleitores (21,62%)
Diferença: 217.769 eleitores.
Considerando que Lula tenha ganho 100% dos 217.769 votos, ele ainda conquistou mais 654.603 votos de eleitores que haviam votado em outros candidatos.
Total de votos de Cury, Zema, Caiado e Renan Santos: 707.990 votos.
Destes 707.990 votos, Lula conquistou 654.603, mesmo com Cury, Caiado e Zema declarando apoio ao Flávio Bolsonaro.
Um fenômeno eleitoral esse Lula.
Flavs retweeted
It looks like Brazil is finding out:
You can vote your way into communism, but you can't vote your way out.
Flavs retweeted
Ireland's banned being hugged by your granny.
Scotland's banned mummies.
Wales is going to have to pull off something pretty spectacular...
Flavs retweeted
Look who’s organising the 20 November student protests in the UK.
The Muslim Brotherhood, via Palestine Action and Antifa. These are coordinated groups that want disorder on our streets.
They’re planning to destroy our cities in the name of social justice and climate change, and they’ll demand an end to our military.
Be really careful, everyone. If you have kids at university, keep them home.
Flavs retweeted
Everyone should have their eyes on France right now and ask themselves a question: is the far right really the main threat we should be worried about?
I don’t say this in defence of the coke-fuelled racist morons who masquerade as patriots whilst throwing Nazi salutes at their Antifa rivals.
But politicians, particularly on the left, talk incessantly about the dangers of the far right, while seeming remarkably reluctant to confront the extremism in their own political ranks.
Yet look at what’s happening on the streets of France. Look at what happens when the far left is let off the leash.
It’s clear much of the radical left is fundamentally hostile to Western civilisation and the institutions that sustain it. Capitalism, free markets, private enterprise, private property - all are regarded as obstacles to be dismantled.
And look at the alliances they make. The political left will march alongside groups whose values ought to be anathema to them, provided they share a common enemy. Consider the solidarity between some Greens and Islamists. Politically, they have precious little in common beyond their hostility to aspects of Western society.
And in France, we see the physical manifestation of grievance politics, identity politics and the relentless division of society into oppressors and oppressed. The politics of resentment, envy and anger.
So look at France and ask yourself: do we really want that kind of political anger and disorder flourishing in Britain?
Because the politics of division and grievance are already deeply embedded in our own society.
It’s long overdue that we had a serious debate about the values, freedoms and standards of civilised behaviour we want to preserve.
We should be equally prepared to confront extremism whether it comes from the left or the right, rather than treating one as inherently more dangerous than the other.
And we certainly shouldn’t wait until our own streets are burning before recognising the danger.





























