Satchell, @RoopeKaaronen & @RLatzman paper on an ecological approach to personality (ft. my fav topics on mental health, social perception, non-human animals, etc). If you want to know what I’m about it’s here. So glad it’s out. Thanks so much team! onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/…

How does playing football in a live tournament or online (FIFA) affect our first impressions? New (Smith, Satchell, Randell & Lancaster) paper at Interpersona. Likeability improved after playing against anyone in any context and some performance effects osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/dq…

I got interviewed for our uni podcast about my work As always, got to talking about effective measurement and open science practices - and how these things help us understand applied issues. Got talking about education, prisons, and even dog massage! lnkd.in/eKHniwaC

We’re at the Service Children’s Progression Alliance 2024 Conference on Inspiring Impact. So much important work today - and how we support those doing the work to gather credible and rigorous evidence of what works to support families. Say hi if you’re here!

We sold out! @_UoW presents Dissecting Dracula - our spooky Humanities and Social Sciences faculty team discussion about the book Dracula! Ft. @UOWPsychology colleague @JStubbersfield We’re talking psychopathy and morbid curiosity!

Great to be at the Armed Forces Covenant conference today. We’re talking about the work we’re currently doing and new developments with @scipalliance to enhance: 📝research rigour, 📊data analysis, ➡️impact for the service families sector. Learning a lot from today!

Excited to be a panel member for our ‘Dissecting Dracula’ event on 30 Oct at @TRwinchester I’ll be talking psychology of charm and manipulation alongside @_UoW colleagues with sociological, philosophical, historic, and literary analyses! theatreroyalwinchester.co.uk…

Great job Jamie for presenting your PhD research at BASS! Looking forward to sharing more of your PhD work on naturally occurring individual differences in rapport experiences for interviewers and witnesses!

Cool data story in here. Something Simpson’s paradox-y when you start looking at London vs other (see thread)

We had a paper rejected because a scale we used doesn't have any reverse scored items... therefore editor was concerned abt response acquiescence - people tending to agree with statements in general - in a paper with null or negative findings in two samples...🙃 what is going on

Very excited to have @HellishNee join us at the Centre for Forensic and Investigative Psychology @UOWPsychology talking about her work on the Virtual Burglary project. Great to see her again!