mica. retweeted
Last comment I’ll make about this (and I know I’m already lying 😂), but the fact that the WNBA has said *nothing* about the A’ja Wilson incident is very on brand for the league.
Gotta grow up at some point.
mica. retweeted
Caitlin sent Travis and Jason the Caitlin 1s!
Travis: “it makes me wanna shoot from half court. Maybe I can be like Caitlin.”
mica. retweeted
Por favor me ayudan a difundir! Es mi tía quien fallecio, buscamos testigos y camaras. 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Raquel Isabel Ferreira volvía de hacer las compras cuando fue embestida por una moto en la esquina de Thames y Guido Spano en Villa Luzuriaga, La Matanza.
Su hijo contó que busca nuevas imágenes y testigos para encontrar a la persona que manejaba la moto, que está prófuga: "Solo hay un video que pude conseguir por medio de una vecina".
mica. retweeted
EL PAÍS ENTERO SE ENTERÓ DEL HORROR QUE PASA EN FORMOSA
En Luzu TV contaron lo que la justicia de Formosa quiso ocultar: a Ian lo dopaban con 12 pastillas por día, lo golpeaban y lo sometían a duches frías en las instituciones del Estado.
Cuando su mamá Elena denunció los abusos, la jueza Nadia Caballero y la asesora Isabela Vera lo mandaron a Corrientes como venganza
Llevamos el caso a la Cámara Federal de Resistencia y a los medios nacionales porque no nos van a callar.
Vamos a ir hasta las últimas consecuencias para terminar con esta perversión.
¡Con los chicos NO!
Exigimos la destitución ya de las responsables y justicia para Ian
mica. retweeted
Necesito que Twitter haga su magia y me ayuden a encontrar a las personas que el martes 16/9 a la tarde ayudaron a mi mamá que se cayó "mientras miraba vidrieras" por Av. Santa Fe. Se golpeó y lastimó mucho la cara. Sé que "tres chicas y dos muchachos" la asistieron, acompañaron
mica. retweeted
Caitlin Clark is the first player to ever score 800+ points in a season AND 300+ assists in a single season
mica. retweeted
BREAKING: Kevin Reddington just walked out of the courtroom and told a few of us what the jury had asked to see: two bags of pill bottles and the knife. These were the pills found in the kitchen and also found in the bedroom drawer.
mica. retweeted
Breaking: Lindsay Clancy's deliberating jury has been randomly selected. It consists of NINE women and THREE men. (3 women, 3 men selected as alternates). The foreperson is an older woman. #WBZ
mica. retweeted
ROAD TO 1,500 GIVEAWAY 🏀
Giving away TWO Caitlin Clark x Wilson basketballs.
But we’re doing this one a little differently.
🎯 Giveaway unlocks when we hit 1,500 followers.
To enter:
• Follow @TheLukaVerse
• RT this post
• Reply CC MVP
• Tag a Caitlin Clark fan who needs to be here
2 winners. One ball each.
Let’s find the real CC sickos. 🫡
mica. retweeted
As I said last week, the prosecutor’s “mortal sin” question was a blatant violation of Mass. G. Evid. § 610. Now a Commonwealth’s expert has again injected Clancy’s Catholicism into the case.
The Commonwealth appears to be substituting religious condemnation for Massachusetts’ legal standard of criminal responsibility. This is not merely improper—it is outrageous.
The repeated violations now raise a serious Oregon v. Kennedy question: whether the conduct meets SCOTUS’s narrow “goading” standard—prosecutorial conduct intended to provoke a mistrial.
At a minimum, the ADA’s conduct warrants sanctions.
mica. retweeted
It bears repeating: this should be a mistrial, You cannot inject religion and describe the "mortal sin" of murder (a factual question for the jury) once, let alone twice. The first time clearly was intentional and this second time is inexcusable. The witness should have been alerted to the already existing issue by the prosecutor. This had to come up in prep? Was their prep?!?! This prosecution is daring the judge to do the unthinkable and knows he will not: declare a mistrial due to misconduct and end the case permanently. And yes, that would "release" Clancy, which is good for nobody, Clancy included. But make no mistake whatever your feelings are about Clancy's guilt: this prosecution is in the gutter. And I'm only talking about the ethics, leaving their competence and strategy choices for another day.
As I said last week, the prosecutor’s “mortal sin” question was a blatant violation of Mass. G. Evid. § 610. Now a Commonwealth’s expert has again injected Clancy’s Catholicism into the case.
The Commonwealth appears to be substituting religious condemnation for Massachusetts’ legal standard of criminal responsibility. This is not merely improper—it is outrageous.
The repeated violations now raise a serious Oregon v. Kennedy question: whether the conduct meets SCOTUS’s narrow “goading” standard—prosecutorial conduct intended to provoke a mistrial.
At a minimum, the ADA’s conduct warrants sanctions.






























