LiamE69 retweeted
"And I said 'it's a shame that Stats for Lefties is jacking it in- I really enjoyed her polished presentation of the facts.' What did I say, Roy?"
"You said, 'I bet he's being investigated by the DWP.'"
"Shut up Roy, no I didn't!"
LiamE69 retweeted
The so called 'Patriot Platform' are hunting down Englishman and demanding they apologise to Pakistanis.
Absolute joke of a movement. They should be shunned by all patriots for this behaviour.
LiamE69 retweeted
Replying to @PhilipIngMBE @DailyMail
It’s no coincidence your name rhymes with dill, Phil!
Here are some facts:
On the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia wanted to integrate with Europe and even raised the possibility of joining NATO twice. Russia had, and has, NO designs on Europe. That was a “narrative” lie (like the experimental COVID gene therapies were “safe and effective”.)
Instead U.S. neocons decided to reap a “peace dividend” by completely crushing Russia.
In the absence of any coherent defence strategy - other than blindly following the U.S. - the UK and Europe jumped on the U.S. bandwagon.
That said, to their credit, at the 2008 Bucharest NATO Summit, France and Germany opposed offering NATO membership to (corrupt) Ukraine because it would cross a MAJOR Russian red line (placing NATO on its border)! In any case, there was no strong support for it within Ukraine. The U.S. ignored the first concern and addressed the second by fomenting the 2014 Maidan Coup to put a puppet in power.
You heavily cite Hitler and the early 1930s. NATO needs to look in a mirror! Russia suffered more than any other European country at Nazi hands. Not only has NATO behaved like Nazis since 2000 - aggressively marching toward Russia, lying and deceiving along the way (see Minsk Agreements), but they also installed a corrupt (compliant) puppet as president of the most corrupt Nazified country in Europe - a country whose national hero is a certified Nazi.
I could go on, but at the very least, I suggest you revisit your understandings. If you need more detail, I’m happy to help an old poorly informed Army mate.
LiamE69 retweeted
Replying to @JoelWBerry
Wow, I wonder what could have possibly happened over the last 10 years that drove White men to become "cripplingly insecure and neurotic about race"?
We have a real Scooby-Doo mystery on our hands.
LiamE69 retweeted
Peace is off the table now mate. We don’t want peace we want you gone.
Replying to @TyasTerry
I'm a Muslim telling you I want peace, yet you've already decided people like me are incapable of it. How do you expect us to coexist if you've written off an entire religion?
LiamE69 retweeted
Here's how some of Britain's publicly funded institutions have treated applicants like us:
MI5, MI6 & GCHQ: Intelligence internship. White British men need not apply.
Bank of England: £5,000 Black Heritage Internship. White applicants excluded.
National Audit Office: Diversity internship. White men excluded unless they meet other eligibility criteria.
TfL: Stuart Ross Placement. White men excluded unless disabled or disadvantaged.
RAF: Fast-tracked 161 female and ethnic minority recruits. Male applicants pushed back.
Cheshire Police: Found guilty of unlawfully discriminating against a white heterosexual male applicant.
All publicly funded. All operating schemes that exclude White male applicants or having faced findings of discrimination against us.
And now our government expects us to fight and die for a state that discriminates against us, treats masculinity like a disease, blames White men for everything wrong with the world and, punishes us for resisting the state sponsored invasion of our own country.
White men, you have no duty to die for an establishment that hates you!
LiamE69 retweeted
Being fairly sure that we're next takes all the fun out of seeing France being destroyed
LiamE69 retweeted
Why would young white British lads fight for a state that so obviously despises them?
LiamE69 retweeted
Superb news. Restore Britain just hit our best ever election result outside of Great Yarmouth - Marcia Talbot won over 14% of the vote for Peterlee in the North East. Very proud of Marcia and her team.
We also scored more than the Lib Dems and Greens combined in Shepshed in Leicestershire.
I want to thank everyone who voted for us, and everyone who campaigned for our candidates.
This is a team effort.
The votes we are winning do not belong to us, and we have a fight on our hands to hold that trust.
That's democracy.
Let's keep pushing on.
LiamE69 retweeted
💥 MAN WALKED FREE FROM COURT DESPITE HAVING 93 SICKENING VIDEOS OF CHILDREN BEING ABUSED
A man caught with almost 100 horrifying videos depicting the sexual abuse of children, some as young as five or six, escaped an immediate prison sentence after claiming he turned to the vile material when he was feeling stressed.
Kalim Khan, then aged 32, from Hull, was found in possession of some of the most serious categories of child sexual abuse material after police raided his home in Plimsoll Way, Victoria Dock.
The disturbing case, heard at Hull Crown Court, saw Khan avoid jail despite admitting three offences of making indecent images of children.
Instead, he was handed a three-year community order and ordered to attend a sex offender treatment programme.
Police launched their investigation after receiving intelligence that indecent images of children were being downloaded using a computer registered to Khan's address.
When officers seized his laptop, forensic specialists uncovered an appalling collection of child abuse material.
Among the discoveries were 54 Category A videos, representing the most serious classification of child sexual abuse imagery.
Investigators also recovered 12 Category B videos and 27 Category C videos, alongside six additional still images.
Some recordings lasted only seconds, while others continued for approximately 15 minutes.
Prosecutor Phillip Evans told the court that children as young as five or six were depicted in the material.
The horrifying nature of the footage was so disturbing that Judge Jeremy Richardson QC chose not to have the detailed police descriptions read aloud in open court.
Khan admitted possessing the material when questioned by detectives. The court heard there was no allegation that he had distributed the images.
However, he also acknowledged that he had used the material for sexual stimulation.
In mitigation, his barrister Silas Reid explained that Khan, who had arrived in Britain from Pakistan in 1996, would retreat into himself during periods of stress and engage in the offending behaviour.
The defence argued that Khan had already sought professional assistance and begun addressing his behaviour.
His lawyer urged the court to consider rehabilitation rather than imprisonment, arguing that preventing further offending was the priority.
But the judge made clear that the existence of the material represented the suffering of real children.
He told Khan: "This is not a victimless crime."
The judge described the abuse depicted in the recordings as revolting and questioned how someone with a responsible job, an apparently stable family life and an educated background could derive sexual gratification from such material.
Despite those damning observations, Khan was spared an immediate custodial sentence.
He was ordered to complete 35 sessions of the Northumbria group sex offender programme, undertake up to 40 days of rehabilitation activity and pay £400 in prosecution costs.
He was also required to register as a sex offender for five years and was made subject to a Sexual Harm Prevention Order for the same period.
Judge Richardson warned that any failure to cooperate with the rehabilitation programme could result in Khan returning to court and being sent to prison.








































