The Moral Case for No Longer Engaging With Elon Musk’s X bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
Lee Allgood retweeted
“We subconsciously pick the data that sustain our prejudices, and block out those that don’t. We can generally spot this tendency in other people; we almost never acknowledge it in ourselves.”
~Daniel Hannan
Lee Allgood retweeted
BREAKING: Colton Moore, the MAGA extremist who threatened Civil War after Trump was indicted in Georgia, was expelled today from the Republican caucus in the Georgia State Senate. meidastouch.com/news/breakin…
Lee Allgood retweeted
💥 IRAN: Shahed drone factory is on fire in Tehran. Iranian dictatorship supplies these drones to the Russian dictatorship to murder Ukrainian civilians.
Lee Allgood retweeted
Former March For Our Lives national organizing Director, and now first Gen Z member of Congress @MaxwellFrostFL just obliterated Republicans sham impeachment
Lee Allgood retweeted
A young statistician saved their lives.
His insight (and how it can change yours):
During World War II, the U.S. wanted to add reinforcement armor to specific areas of its planes.
Analysts examined returning bombers and plotted the bullet holes and damage on them (as in the image below).
Based on this analysis, they came to the conclusion that adding armor to the tail, body, and wings would improve their odds of survival.
But a young statistician named Abraham Wald noted that this would be a tragic mistake.
By only plotting data on the planes that returned, they were systematically omitting the data on a critical, informative subset:
The planes that were damaged and unable to return.
Abraham Wald recognized a key fact:
• "Seen" planes had sustained damage that was survivable.
• "Unseen" planes had sustained damage that was not survivable.
Wald concluded that armor should be added to the *unharmed* regions of the returning planes (the areas without bullet holes on the image below).
His profound logic:
Where the survivors were unharmed was actually where the planes were most vulnerable.
Based on his insight, the military reinforced the engine and other vulnerable parts, significantly improving the safety of the crews during combat and saving thousands of lives.
Abraham Wald had identified a cognitive bias called "Survivorship Bias":
The error resulting from systematically focusing on survivors (successes) and ignoring casualties (failures) that causes us to miss the true base rates of survival (the actual probability of success) and arrive at flawed conclusions.
We see examples of Survivorship Bias all around us:
1. We read books on the common traits of successful people, but fail to consider all of the unsuccessful people who possessed those same traits.
2. We applaud the belief when we hear that an entrepreneur took out a second mortgage and succeeded, but fail to consider all of the entrepreneurs who did the same and went bankrupt.
3. We study the cultural strategies of the most successful companies, but fail to consider all of the companies that followed those same strategies and fell apart.
When we fail to consider the range of outcomes and the hidden evidence, we develop a skewed (and often incorrect) view of reality.
It cannot be avoided altogether, because the vast majority of books and history are written by and about the survivors and victors, but wherever possible, consider the unseen evidence.
Remember: What is unseen often has just as much value as what is seen.
***
If you enjoyed this or learned something, follow me @SahilBloom for more in future!
Lee Allgood retweeted
We’re bringing back the “MTP will eat one hotdog for every touchdown Auburn scores” challenge for the UGA game. MTP will be eating lunch beforehand.
unavailable
Lee Allgood retweeted
Chapman deserves credit for keeping his wits about him here and getting this punt off. #auburnfootball @thewarrapport
Some moderate Republicans are in talks to use a House rule from more than 100 years ago to try to end a government shutdown if needed bloomberg.com/news/newslette… via @bpolitics
Lee Allgood retweeted
Took my wife out to date night & see some houses (then a football game)
This restaurant charges a 4% fee for using a credit card
1. Bull as there's no heads up
2. Biz don't owe 4% for fees. It's 2.5-3% plus $0.1-0.35/swipe.
So they're making a spread
Restaurants laughing at us for all the help we gave them during Covid
"It's only $3 cheapskate"
It's shady business practices.
People eventually fight back & many restaurants will get hit
Replying to @kenzietuff
@kenzietuff A-10 1st for what it means to both the pilot and those on the ground. SR-71 is a very close second. But it is hard to pick because their missions are so different. @DaleStarkA10 @PabloEscoburner




















