Views expressed are my own. L/R does not equal endorsement

PNW
Joined March 2009
Be Heard: Join Our Study and Impact V I ResearchĀ  react19.org/study The first-ever IRB approved v i study is underway but we need your participation for this to be a success! Help us move this issue from RARE, to REAL, by participating from the comfort of your own home!Ā  Recruitment is now OPEN for a new patient-led research collaboration about adverse reactions following Covid-19 vaccination University of Maryland Baltimore).Ā  The study will help all of us understand many aspects of this illness, including treatments that people have tried.
3
267
forurobinšŸ’œ retweeted
THERE’S MORE: In addition to the texts, @SenRandPaul and I released an email from Dr. Janet Woodcock from May 2021. Dr. Woodcock emailed Dr. Fauci about personally receiving reports of patients experiencing hard to classify adverse events: ā€œno one takes them seriously, no one knows how to treat them, and there is no effort to study this.ā€ Oddly, Dr. Anthony Fauci seemed reluctant to respond to her but felt he couldn’t ignore her. Ā  Why wasn’t the public alerted to their concerns? Why did they continue to push and mandate the COVID shot? Why weren’t Americans allowed fully informed consent? (2/2)🧵
266
1,760
165
5,193
734,496
forurobinšŸ’œ retweeted
Interesting long argument with @grok about @naomirwolf's statement as follows: "Pfizer followed 32 women to the end of their pregnancies. 28 lost their babies." Grok exploded in a rage that this is false. I offered 7 different reframing of the statement and Grok pettifogged each time. I kept trying. Grok finally granted that the following sentence is true: "Pfizer had outcome reports on 32 women to the end of their pregnancies. 28 lost their babies." Use the word "followed" and Grok explodes in a rage. Substitute with "had outcome reports" and Grok grants it.
193
527
46
2,179
62,503
forurobinšŸ’œ retweeted
Despite privately texting with Fauci about their concerns regarding COVID shots for pregnant women, Rochelle Walensky told the public on April 23, 2021: ā€œImportantly, no safety concerns were observed for people vaccinated in the third trimester or safety concerns for their babies.ā€
NEW: Dr. Fauci was concerned in January 2021 that the second dose of the COVID shot ā€œtheoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the 1st trimester.ā€ Ā  @SenRandPaul and I released the texts between Anthony Fauci, Rochelle Walensky, and Vivek Murthy below. Ā  While I’ve been conducting oversight for years, now that we have the documents and Fauci’s government-issued phone, my investigation has only just begun.
1,029
3,803
398
9,382
880,280
forurobinšŸ’œ retweeted
BREAKING: Sen. Rand Paul says newly released internal federal documents show the FBI asked Customs and Border Protection not to stop, search, or question EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak when he returned from China through JFK Airport in 2021 during the WHO’s COVID-19 origins investigation. According to the documents, CBP had identified Daszak as an ā€œextremely high person of interestā€ and planned to search his electronic devices and question him about his ties to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, but stood down after a request from the FBI. VIA: @BillMelugin_
426
5,414
331
15,518
1,067,829
forurobinšŸ’œ retweeted
BREAKING: Nearly one-fourth of all advertising on CNN, ABC, CBS, and MSNOW comes from pharmaceutical companies, suggesting that these networks’ lack of coverage on DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s recent declassification regarding Anthony Fauci’s cover-up of the COVID-19 pandemic may be intentional.
86
565
25
2,062
263,076
forurobinšŸ’œ retweeted
Below is the letter we just sent on behalf of @ICANdecide, @React19org and others to current CDC Acting Director, @DrJBhattacharya, regarding $1.5 billion contracts for Covid-19 vaccines. I am confident Dr. Bhattacharya and @SecKennedy would prefer to direct these funds toward treating and compensating the vaccine injured. I hope the White House will let that happen. As a country, we should take care of those harmed before we rush forward harming others. Here is the text of the letter (with link to the original below): Dear Dr. Bhattacharya, We write on behalf of ICAN, React19, and numerous others to express our deep concern and disappointment that CDC has agreed to purchase $1.55 billion worth of pediatric and adult Covid-19 vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna, and to raise serious concern regarding a potential violation of federal law.[1] For the millions of Americans harmed by these products, this decision is deeply painful. Rather than directing resources towards treating those whose lives have been devastated, CDC has chosen to further enrich Pfizer and Moderna. The vaccine-injured deserve acknowledgement and care—not abandonment. The tens of thousands of individuals with serious injuries who have contacted our firm alone, and the over 40,000 members of just one group, React19,[2] with serious injuries represent real people whose suffering demands recognition. To allocate more than a billion and a half tax dollars to Pfizer and Moderna while offering those injured by their products nothing is a profound betrayal. We struggle to comprehend how CDC’s current leadership can continue to disregard, among others, the following established facts: •CDC fought in court for over 2 years to prevent public disclosure of data which showed that over 7% of the 10 million V-safe users reported needing medical care after a Covid vaccine, on average 2 to 3 times each, with over 70% of those medical encounters resulting in hospitalization, emergency room visits, or urgent care.[3] •The fact that FDA fought for years to hide data, recently released, showing that when FDA adequately conducted empirical Bayesian analysis internally, it revealed significant safety signals that were hidden from the public.[4] •In the clinical trial for Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine, there were 21 deaths in the vaccinated group and 17 deaths in the placebo group—meaning more deaths occurred in the vaccinated group—during the same time period, and where the placebo group contained more participants than the vaccinated group.[5] •Those seriously injured by this product have been left without recourse because pharmaceutical companies have been granted complete immunity under the PREP Act, while the Countermeasure Injury Compensation Program (CICP) remains woefully underfunded and structurally designed to deny compensation (only 0.39% [56 of 14,152] of COVID-related CICP claims have been compensated, with an average payout, excluding three outliers, of a miserly $5,052.57 per claimant)[6]—leaving the injured with nowhere to turn. •Five years after assuring the world these products are safe, the manufacturers still require PREP Act immunity for the very harms they claim will not occur—an obvious contradiction that requires suspending reality and reason to believe. Until PREP Act immunity is lifted and the full scope of harm is properly accounted for, the CDC should not direct over a billion and a half dollars to Pfizer and Moderna. These funds should instead be used to treat and compensate those who have already been seriously harmed—the people who have been waiting far too long for help. The people who the CDC assured this product was safe. CDC should cancel these contracts on the basis that it would be the moral, ethical, and compassionate thing to do. But if it won’t do so on those bases then, in order to confirm these contracts do not violate federal law, and to avoid litigation, please confirm forthwith that the procurement contracts with Pfizer and Moderna were not in any manner related to the Vaccines for Children Program (VFC), and that absent Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) approval, they will not be part of this program. As you are no doubt aware, absent approval from ACIP, the vaccines procured from Pfizer and Moderna pursuant to these contracts cannot be procured, distributed, or administered through the VFC, and any such conduct would be a clear violation of federal law.[7] As provided in Section 1928 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396s), the VFC mandates that only vaccines recommended by ACIP may be provided under the VFC. Specifically, 42 U.S.C. § 1396s(e) requires the Secretary to use ā€œthe list established (and periodically reviewed and as appropriate revised) by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.ā€ Accordingly, unless and until ACIP affirmatively recommends these Covid-19 vaccines for the applicable pediatric populations, any distribution or administration of the vaccines procured under these contracts through the VFC would constitute a violation of Section 1928 and its implementing regulations. Please confirm forthwith that the procurement contracts have been cancelled and that the funds will be reallocated to assist the vaccine injured. We hope, given your prior statements regarding these products, that you will take this approach. But if the moral and humane approach is not taken, at the very least please confirm forthwith that these procurement contracts are entirely unrelated to the VFC. Very truly yours, /s/ Aaron Siri Here is a link to the full letter: icandecide.org/wp-content/up…
89
877
63
2,057
100,689
forurobinšŸ’œ retweeted
This is a scandal WAY bigger than Watergate. @CNN, @MSNOWNews, @NBCNews, @ABC, @PBS — it's past time to cover this. People died from the COVID shot because the government lied to them, yet the legacy media refuses to report on this story.
1,180
11,894
403
31,251
767,689
Sen. Ron Johnson breaks down how deep the @US_FDA cover-up of Covid-19 vaccine injuries really goes: ā€œIt’s not just Peter Marks.ā€ ā€œIt was other senior FDA officials.ā€ ā€œThey’re all complicit.ā€ Top FDA officials had evidence the shots caused: ā€œSudden cardiac death.ā€ ā€œPulmonary infarction.ā€ ā€œBell’s palsy.ā€ ā€œAnd different types of strokes.ā€ In 2021, Dr. Peter Marks was ā€œbriefed that the [VAERS] algorithm… was actually hiding and masking safety signals.ā€ ā€œHe probably breathed a huge sigh of relief.ā€ ā€œHe’s gone, ā€˜I got my answer here, so we’ll maintain doing this algorithm even though they’re developing a new one that will unmask these safety signals.ā€™ā€ ā€œā€˜We’ll keep using this.ā€™ā€ ā€œā€˜We’ll say we’ve got to be consistent.ā€™ā€ ā€œā€˜And then I can go to the American public and lie to them bald-faced and say, we’re just not seeing safety signals.ā€™ā€ ā€œThe problem is, Dr. Ana Szarfman did more than just brief him that their algorithm was already invalid and they were developing a new one.ā€ ā€œThey developed a new algorithm that showed that the current algorithm had 49 severe cases of masking.ā€ ā€œAnd the new algorithm showed 25 safety signals of very severe adverse events.ā€ ā€œFor 3 months, she kept showing them more safety signals, but they didn’t pin a medal on her chest.ā€ ā€œThey sent her off to the side.ā€ ā€œThey ordered her to cease and desist.ā€ @SenRonJohnson @CHDTVLive
63
1,000
45
2,159
69,654
forurobinšŸ’œ retweeted
Prior to 1997, there was serious media coverage on vaccine injuries. The swine flu vaccine was pulled from the market after 25-30 deaths were associated with it. Today, there are over 39,000 deaths associated with the COVID shot and countless more injuries. Yet the legacy media remains silent. Could Big Pharma’s billions of dollars in advertising spending be the reason?
309
2,453
88
6,360
61,771
forurobinšŸ’œ retweeted
The Democrats' medical expert witnesses claim that the COVID injection is safe and effective — yet they don't understand how it works. - It was modified NOT to degrade. - It has been shown to circulate in the body for 700 days after injection. How can they assure the American people of its safety when they can't even explain how it works?
293
1,873
80
6,159
170,888
forurobinšŸ’œ retweeted
FDA’s vaccine committee just shamelessly voted to recommend an updated Covid-19 vaccine, ignoring its incredible trail of harm. Here is the text of the three-minute speech I delivered to the committee before they voted:Ā  Ā  If you’re interested in making an evidenced-based and not belief-based decision regarding Covid-19 vaccines, please review the data and evidence in the letter we submitted to this committee. Ā  Don’t ignore the tens of thousands of individuals that have contacted just our law firm regarding serious injuries from Covid-19 vaccine. Ā  Don’t ignore the over 40 thousand individuals seriously injured from these products that are members of just one group – React19. Ā  Don’t ignore the fact CDC fought us in court for over 2 years to hide from the public the data which showed that over 7% of the 10 million V-safe users reported needing medical care after a Covid-19 vaccine, on average 2 to 3 times each, with over 70% of those medical encounters resulting in hospitalization, emergency room or urgent care. Ā  Don’t ignore the fact FDA fought for years to hide the data, which has been just recently released, showing that when FDA properly conducted Empirical Bayesian analysis internally, it resulted in incredible safety signals that were hidden from the public. Ā  Don’t ignore the fact that in the clinical trial for Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine there were 21 deaths in the vaccinated group and 17 deaths in the placebo group, meaning more in the vaccinated group, during the same time period and I note the placebo group actually had slightly more people than the vaccinated group. Ā  Don’t forget that those seriously injured by these products have been abandoned because pharma has been given complete immunity for their injuries under the PREP Act and the CICP has almost no funding to pay claims and is designed to deny compensation – to call the CICP a perverse mockery of justice and betrayal would be far too kind. Ā  Five years after assuring the world these products are safe, they still need PREP Act immunity for the harms they supposedly won’t cause. Ā  Until this immunity is lifted and the harms actually accounted for, this committee should decline to recommend any further Covid-19 vaccines. Ā  But, given the prior statements made by some members of this committee about these products, statements reflecting belief- and not evidence-based views about them, it will no doubt be hard to objectively consider the data and evidence regarding these products. But please try. Thank you. Ā  youtube.com/live/3wU0NWzXvZY…
269
1,568
151
3,730
331,049
forurobinšŸ’œ retweeted
This is the biggest government scandal of my lifetime, and the legacy media refuses to cover it. The FDA knew that COVID injections were causing severe adverse events, including sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, and Bell’s palsy. Americans had the Right to Know, and those affected deserve justice.
3,946
32,629
1,197
85,007
1,892,189
forurobinšŸ’œ retweeted
A virus or some other pathogen emerges somewhere in the world. The media shifts into apocalyptic mode. "Experts" appear to be predicting catastrophe. Computer models project millions dead, if the right circumstances coalesce. Politicians declare emergencies. Pharmaceutical companies announce new products. Social media turns into a digital panic attack. And ordinary people, who just wanted to buy eggs and walk the dog, suddenly feel like civilization is one cough away from collapse. Wash. Rinse. Repeat. This is how psychological bioterrorism works. The pathogen itself matters less than the emotional payload attached to it.
751
7,004
392
18,685
310,291
AfterCNN found out what Senator Johnson planned to discuss they cancelled his interview. Not good for their advertisers. Not allowed. #statemedia
Thank you, @kayleighmcenany, for reporting on this blockbuster revelation that Americans deserve to know. U.S. federal health officials intentionally used a flawed reporting analysis system that hid serious adverse events from the COVID shot. I will continue my investigation into this and work to bring the truth to the American people.
15
forurobinšŸ’œ retweeted
Dr. Fauci and his accomplices have a LOT of explaining to do. Now that I have HHS documents, my investigation has only just begun.
3,089
5,299
328
20,376
353,306
forurobinšŸ’œ retweeted
The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry. The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine. The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true. The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either. The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought. The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to. The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer. Now it is today. Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus. He is confident. He has always been confident. The confidence has never been the problem. The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.
1,097
11,572
843
34,234
2,173,772
forurobinšŸ’œ retweeted
Britain has dethroned a prince, forced Mandelson to resign, & lost confidence in Starmer because @RepThomasMassie & I forced the release of the Epstein files. What is America doing to hold the Epstein class accountable? We need to haul these powerful men before Congress.
1,442
8,110
209
40,668
910,770
forurobinšŸ’œ retweeted
Even drugs that have only millions in annual sales and cause severe side effects can be sold profitably. But vaccines that have billions in annual sales purportedly can't be profitable without protection for the harms they will cause... That should cause incredible concern.
🚨 NEW: Fmr. CDC Director Rochelle Walensky says if vaccine manufacturers are not ā€œfree of responsibilityā€ for vaccine injuries, they may choose not to make them
94
689
14
2,514
53,250
forurobinšŸ’œ retweeted
RFK Jr did not ban the hep b vaccine. The vaccine advisory board now recommends that you make the decision with your doctor or wait until 2 months. Other countries do not vaccinate every newborn and some have lower hep b rates than the U.S.. So let’s stop spreading propaganda about this topic and stick to the facts.
83
502
21
2,404
48,625
forurobinšŸ’œ retweeted
In March 2022, Dr. Joseph Fraiman taped an internal call between FDA directors and physicians who were concerned about mRNA side effects in their patients – including the cardiac arrest and sudden death of a 7-year-old days after being injected with Pfizer's mRNA vaccine. ā€¢ā€¢ć€Œ LINKS & SOURCES: drdrew.com/12042025 ć€ā€¢ā€¢ "This was a top level meeting of directors," Dr. Fraiman revealed to Ask Dr. Drew in Sept 2023. "This entire meeting terrified my entire work group." The call – legally recorded by Dr. Fraiman – included FDA Director Dr. Peter Marks, Dr. Peter Doshi, Dr. Celia Witten, Dr. Sarah Walinsky, Dr. Lorrie McNeill, and many other experts. "What they're saying here is they're not doing statistical testing on adverse events. This is really insane to me," Dr. Fraiman continued. "You know there's a problem if the vaccine group has a higher rate of them." In the call, UCLA pediatric specialist Dr. Patrick Whelan told FDA directors that he filed a VAERS report about a 7-year-old patient who "had a cardiac arrest following his first Pfizer vaccination" but says he "didn't receive any follow up." "The patient died about 8 days later," says Dr. Whelan. "There's something wrong with the reporting system." Listen to the call at youtu.be/OTBQXRnBHkE
29
531
27
1,236
67,351