老陈 | 已肉身翻墙多年 | 轻度内容创作者，善于接茬儿讲故事 | 专治各种双标婊、hypocrites、舔共大外宣 | Don't Let America Become China
USA
Joined June 2024
- Tweets83.7K
- Following1.2K
- Followers554
- Likes74.9K
老陈 retweeted
Every Republican legislature in America should immediately pass legislation to:
1) Ban sanctuary cities
2) Ban Ranked Choice Voting
3) Ban ballot harvesting
4) Require citizenship to vote
5) Require photo ID to vote
6) Ban the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact
7) Ban foreign entities from buying property
8) Suspend any gas taxes
9) Institute school choice
10) Abolish property taxes
11) Open non-juror records to public inspection
12) Mandate secretaries of state to share complete voter registration rolls with DOJ
13) Mandate voter roll list maintenance
14) Offer rewards for convictions involving fraudulent use of Medicare, Medicaid, SNAP, Social Security, or other entitlements
Republican governors would be wise to use this time to convene special sessions.
Every Republican legislature in America should immediately pass legislation to:
1) Ban sanctuary cities
2) Ban Ranked Choice Voting
3) Ban ballot harvesting
4) Require citizenship to vote
5) Require photo ID to vote
6) Ban the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact
7) Ban foreign entities from buying property
8) Suspend any gas taxes
9) Institute school choice
10) Abolish property taxes
11) Open non-juror records to public inspection
12) Mandate secretaries of state to share complete voter registration rolls with DOJ
13) Mandate voter roll list maintenance
14) Offer rewards for convictions involving fraudulent use of Medicare, Medicaid, SNAP, Social Security, or other entitlements
15) Freeze rent increases
Republican governors would be wise to use this time to convene special sessions.
老陈 retweeted
Normally in a midterm, the national mood pushes everyone in one direction, but individual candidates can swim against it. A popular incumbent or a hometown favorite can run well ahead of their party.
In 2026, nobody did. No Republican Senate candidate ran meaningfully ahead of Trump’s share. Strong candidates, weak candidates, incumbents, open seats, red states, blue states, they all landed in a narrow band at or below him.
Whatever was driving the vote was national, and strong enough to wash out the usual local differences.
老陈 retweeted
Oh, boy... here we go again. She is not saying there is no fraud. She is saying what will probably happen depending on how this is approached. And if you followed her Democracy File drops, the other side TOLD us their plan. Now, do with that what you will. I, for one, don't want civil war, but I will fight to my death to preserve our Republic (not that I'd be much help).
🚨🚨 THE DEMOCRACY FILES / THE INSURRECTION PLAYBOOK, SPECIAL EDITION: ON CROSSING THE RUBICON 🚨
Many people on 𝕏 are calling for elections to not to be certified, or for Trump to not to seat the new Congress on January 3rd.
In a sense, attributing 2026 results to cheating is too narrow of a way to look at a much larger and a much worse problem.
The problem isn't that machines decided to flip 15% of Republican votes and stole the 2026 midterms from us.
The problem is that our elections are untransparent, monopolized by mysterious NGOs, and set up institutionally such that they are impossible to challenge or audit honestly.
I wrote a book, UNELECTED. It lays out the whole NGO Administrative Complex and how they have monopolized virtually every facet of our ordinary society and perform functions through, above, and despite Congress. This is what they do. They cut off every single plausible path to their own reform.
The last two chapters explain my remedy, but I do not believe these chapters are easily approached without reading the other 300+ pages first. And I've had fans compare it to "A Brief History of Time" in complexity ... while I wouldn't go that far, it is an enormous problem with an enormous network that developed over an enormous amount of time.
The good news is that our anger at finding out about this, and our lashing out at all this is the epistemic bubble popping. Regimes don't last long after that.
The bad news is - to borrow a phrase my friend uses - there are many ways to lose, and few ways to preserve our Republic.
I'm not here to tell you that President Trump shouldn't use the 2026 elections to force a showdown.
I'm here to tell you what happens if he does. If he goes down this route, he better treat it like crossing the Rubicon.
Pray for peace and wisdom for the administration as they deal with the many difficult decisions ahead.
Watch the video with an open mind and heart.
老陈 retweeted
🚨 Q: You're entering the next life [before God], all you have to do to enter paradise is feel love and forgiveness for James Comey, Nancy Pelosi, etc...can you do it?
TRUMP: Then I wouldn't be real, would I? The easy answer is, yes, I could forgive. They are extremely dishonest people, bad people, I love our country far more...the answer is no. I want to be honest.
Q: In judgement before God?
TRUMP: I do hate some of my enemies. Look what they put me through.
REPORTER: You had the most charmed and remarkable life of any American in my entire lifetime, and you can't find it in your heart to forgive some of your enemies?
TRUMP: All I have to do is say yes, I can. Can I be honest? I probably cannot do that. Because I do hate some of my enemies — and I always will.
Never heard Trump get asked such a deep question like that before.
He COULD just say "yes" and get out of the question, but he didn't
One thing you have to admit is this man is brutally honest.
老陈 retweeted
🚨🚨 THE DEMOCRACY FILES / THE INSURRECTION PLAYBOOK, SPECIAL EDITION: ON CROSSING THE RUBICON 🚨
Many people on 𝕏 are calling for elections to not to be certified, or for Trump to not to seat the new Congress on January 3rd.
In a sense, attributing 2026 results to cheating is too narrow of a way to look at a much larger and a much worse problem.
The problem isn't that machines decided to flip 15% of Republican votes and stole the 2026 midterms from us.
The problem is that our elections are untransparent, monopolized by mysterious NGOs, and set up institutionally such that they are impossible to challenge or audit honestly.
I wrote a book, UNELECTED. It lays out the whole NGO Administrative Complex and how they have monopolized virtually every facet of our ordinary society and perform functions through, above, and despite Congress. This is what they do. They cut off every single plausible path to their own reform.
The last two chapters explain my remedy, but I do not believe these chapters are easily approached without reading the other 300+ pages first. And I've had fans compare it to "A Brief History of Time" in complexity ... while I wouldn't go that far, it is an enormous problem with an enormous network that developed over an enormous amount of time.
The good news is that our anger at finding out about this, and our lashing out at all this is the epistemic bubble popping. Regimes don't last long after that.
The bad news is - to borrow a phrase my friend uses - there are many ways to lose, and few ways to preserve our Republic.
I'm not here to tell you that President Trump shouldn't use the 2026 elections to force a showdown.
I'm here to tell you what happens if he does. If he goes down this route, he better treat it like crossing the Rubicon.
Pray for peace and wisdom for the administration as they deal with the many difficult decisions ahead.
Watch the video with an open mind and heart.
老陈 retweeted
There is a map circulating widely on X and elsewhere that allegedly shows Texas as voting blue in every county.
That is NOT what that map is showing. Instead, it's merely showing the degree to which each Texas county shifted blue compared to 2024.
It does NOT show that Democrats won every county.
Instead, the below chart shows who actually won each county.
This is why I am suggesting that everyone should use discernment before they freak out.
老陈 retweeted
🚨 LMAO! President Trump says he was just KIDDING about making Dana White White House Press Secretary — but then Dana actually liked the idea and he's flying to DC anyway
"I WAS only kidding, but Dana LOVES the idea. You wouldn't mess around with him so much!" 🤣
"That was an example of something where I was kidding, and then people said, you know, that's actually a pretty good idea!"
Let Dana have at least ONE ROUND with the fake news at the podium
It would be glorious!
🤣🤣
我昨天晚上吃了一片伟哥做实验，来说说我的感觉吧
1. 吃完半小时，躺在床上能感觉到自己的心跳，有点喝了小酒的感觉。
2. 打开电视看了会新闻联播，没有勃起
3. 半小时过去了，自己一个人躺床上，没有勃起
4. 女朋友进屋，穿着平时穿的睡衣，躺我边上看电视，看着女朋友的大腿，瞬间就硬了
5. 戴套开干，换了四个姿势，就是不射
6. 女朋友说我今天比以前的时候硬，做这么长时间都不射，是不是吃药了。我说我喝了杯红牛
7. 做的很爽，就是不射。女朋友被搞得死去活来。最后放弃
8. 最后看着动作片，自己用手才射。射完之后竟然还是硬的
9. 夜里睡得不好，感觉自己心跳的扑通扑通的。早晨醒来，坚挺无比
10. 看着片子又撸了一发，整个人到现在都没有精神，感觉跟虚脱的希望。
11. 自己到了单位，看见了打菜的张阿姨，下面又硬了
12. 不停的喝水，希望药效赶快消失
13. 到了办公室，终于不硬了
14. 上厕所的时候看见了打扫卫生的李阿姨，又硬了。
老陈 retweeted
Levels of wealth:-
L1 - financial independence
L2 - luxury car
L3 - private jet
L4 - yatch
L5 - chinese spy
老陈 retweeted
NAILED IT thank you.
🚨 THE GREATEST THREAT TO ELECTION INTEGRITY ISN’T JUST FRAUD, IT’S THE PERMANENT, WELL-FUNDED PROGRESSIVE NGO GROUND MACHINE THAT PHYSICALLY TURNS OUT VOTERS WHILE REPUBLICANS RELY ON ADS, CONSULTANTS, AND TWEETS.
DataRepublican’s Democracy Files Part 16 (“How the Midterms Were Pulled Off”) shows NGOs bragging, in their own words, about the scale of field ops, registration, youth mobilization, and early voting work that made races “too big to rig.”
In Georgia, Melody Oliphant (Executive Director, Georgia Youth Justice Coalition / GYJC) claimed her group knocked more than 19,000 doors and made nearly 49,000 calls, and that this “absolutely made the difference in Georgia.” The flow chart is simple: DONOR → MVP → GYJC → DOORS. GYJC is a progressive youth organizing group (501(c)(4), Abrams-linked ecosystem) that has long done massive campus/door/phone GOTV and claims credit for youth turnout edges.
This is not one-off. It’s institutional, year-round paid and volunteer organizers, data-driven targeting of young/left-leaning voters, pledge cards, campus phone banks, and coordination across groups. Republicans have institutional blindness, endless conferences on “the message” while the other side builds the supply line that gets bodies to the polls. Citizenship verification remains largely an honor system, the biggest swings keep hitting among young voters and other high-intensity demos.
Republicans can counter this NOW:
Build and fund parallel ground operations (door-knocking, phone banking, registration, early-voting drives) instead of treating elections as ad contests.
Engage young conservatives on campuses and in communities with the same relational, consistent organizing (not just social media).
Support effective local and national GOTV groups that prioritize physical contact and voter turnout over pure messaging.
Demand GOP committees and PACs shift resources from consultants/TV to field infrastructure and data.
Watch, audit, and match the scale in real time, especially in swing areas like Georgia.
Watch the receipts: xitter.cf/DataRepublican/status/…
This machine is already running. Match the operational intensity or keep losing the ground 👇
老陈 retweeted
🚨 THE GREATEST THREAT TO ELECTION INTEGRITY ISN’T JUST FRAUD, IT’S THE PERMANENT, WELL-FUNDED PROGRESSIVE NGO GROUND MACHINE THAT PHYSICALLY TURNS OUT VOTERS WHILE REPUBLICANS RELY ON ADS, CONSULTANTS, AND TWEETS.
DataRepublican’s Democracy Files Part 16 (“How the Midterms Were Pulled Off”) shows NGOs bragging, in their own words, about the scale of field ops, registration, youth mobilization, and early voting work that made races “too big to rig.”
In Georgia, Melody Oliphant (Executive Director, Georgia Youth Justice Coalition / GYJC) claimed her group knocked more than 19,000 doors and made nearly 49,000 calls, and that this “absolutely made the difference in Georgia.” The flow chart is simple: DONOR → MVP → GYJC → DOORS. GYJC is a progressive youth organizing group (501(c)(4), Abrams-linked ecosystem) that has long done massive campus/door/phone GOTV and claims credit for youth turnout edges.
This is not one-off. It’s institutional, year-round paid and volunteer organizers, data-driven targeting of young/left-leaning voters, pledge cards, campus phone banks, and coordination across groups. Republicans have institutional blindness, endless conferences on “the message” while the other side builds the supply line that gets bodies to the polls. Citizenship verification remains largely an honor system, the biggest swings keep hitting among young voters and other high-intensity demos.
Republicans can counter this NOW:
Build and fund parallel ground operations (door-knocking, phone banking, registration, early-voting drives) instead of treating elections as ad contests.
Engage young conservatives on campuses and in communities with the same relational, consistent organizing (not just social media).
Support effective local and national GOTV groups that prioritize physical contact and voter turnout over pure messaging.
Demand GOP committees and PACs shift resources from consultants/TV to field infrastructure and data.
Watch, audit, and match the scale in real time, especially in swing areas like Georgia.
Watch the receipts: xitter.cf/DataRepublican/status/…
This machine is already running. Match the operational intensity or keep losing the ground 👇
🚨🚨 THE DEMOCRACY FILES / ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK, PART 16: HOW THE MIDTERMS WERE PULLED OFF 🚨
Among today's talk of voter fraud, a critical role is overlooked: the importance of NGOs in early voting.
Below, I show the receipts where NGOs directly take a role in making the midterms happen.
It's been a long week, and I'm too tired to type up a summary.
Just know the two main points:
Republicans have an institutional blindness. They believe getting voters is all about branding and messaging. They pay enormous sums to consultants and TV ads and have endless conferences on what the right "message" is.
Democrats, meanwhile, have built an entire and expensive institutional machinery around getting people physically to the polls. And they were more motivated in 2026 than any other year.
I do NOT deny the existence of voter fraud. Saying the data doesn't show that others claim to show, is not equivalent to saying there is no fraud.
As I've said in several posts today, the election system in the United States is structurally set up such that citizenship verification is an honor system. The biggest swings in 2026 were among young people and Hispanics.
And 2026 was a concerted effort by NGOs like none other. Watch them in their own words how they pulled it off:
这就是在胡说八道。其他那些地方本来就可以给不是公民的人的，ID 和 SSN 与公民身份二者彼此之间从来就没有过“充要条件”的关系。有的地方甚至只给你一张纸让你签字承诺你是公民然后就可以注册可以投，根本没有具体的验证。
我感觉很多推友没有真正在美国投过票，想当然的以为不查ID就是什么人都能去投票。这种想法是错误的，原因是你们不了解美国的投票机制
无论是亲自投票还是邮寄选票，首先需要进行一步选民登记。没有登记过的美国人也是不能投票的。
选民登记表上会要求填写美国驾照，社会安全号码（SSN）的后四位，相当于是已经查了ID. 而邮寄选票也是只有注册选民才能申请。
两党争论的是，去现场投票站投票时，需不需要出示符合规定的ID。共和党觉得需要，民主党觉得不必要。
蓝州（倾向“不查ID”）的逻辑是，既然已经依法完成了选民登记。你的名字、生日、住址已经录入了该选区的选民名册中（注册时已经核验过SSN 或驾照），那么没有必要再设一道坎。他们认为通过现有非ID州验证程序加上严惩冒名投票（重罪）已足够安全
而且根据联邦《帮助美国投票法》，在第一次投票时必须出示一次身份证明。过了第一次之后，后续投票才可以完全不查 ID。
所以蓝州投票不是“谁都可以去投”，而是把身份核验的步骤放在了“选民注册”阶段，从而减免了现场检查物理证件的程序。
关于查个ID不是很简单的事为什么不行，这又是中国人和美国人和思想差异了。在中国地铁安检习以为常，在美国如果地铁还要搞个安检，各地游行又要翻天
老陈 retweeted
1. ssn和驾照不用入籍，学生签证甚至访学都能拿
2. 地铁的确不用查id，但买个烟买个酒坐飞机都要查id
3. 窝并不care你们美国非公民是不是会去投票的问题，窝只想表达你说了这么多，没有一条可以支持你自己的claim
我感觉很多推友没有真正在美国投过票，想当然的以为不查ID就是什么人都能去投票。这种想法是错误的，原因是你们不了解美国的投票机制
无论是亲自投票还是邮寄选票，首先需要进行一步选民登记。没有登记过的美国人也是不能投票的。
选民登记表上会要求填写美国驾照，社会安全号码（SSN）的后四位，相当于是已经查了ID. 而邮寄选票也是只有注册选民才能申请。
两党争论的是，去现场投票站投票时，需不需要出示符合规定的ID。共和党觉得需要，民主党觉得不必要。
蓝州（倾向“不查ID”）的逻辑是，既然已经依法完成了选民登记。你的名字、生日、住址已经录入了该选区的选民名册中（注册时已经核验过SSN 或驾照），那么没有必要再设一道坎。他们认为通过现有非ID州验证程序加上严惩冒名投票（重罪）已足够安全
而且根据联邦《帮助美国投票法》，在第一次投票时必须出示一次身份证明。过了第一次之后，后续投票才可以完全不查 ID。
所以蓝州投票不是“谁都可以去投”，而是把身份核验的步骤放在了“选民注册”阶段，从而减免了现场检查物理证件的程序。
关于查个ID不是很简单的事为什么不行，这又是中国人和美国人和思想差异了。在中国地铁安检习以为常，在美国如果地铁还要搞个安检，各地游行又要翻天
