I see some concerns about the Hyperliquid listing delay. To be clear, we did not initiate the vote to list there and are in no way affiliated with Nova. It was entirely community led and we told everyone that we would do what's necessary, but did not have it on our immediate roadmap. Once it became evident that Nova will not be following through on the initial listing plan, we announced that we will do it ourselves instead to honor the community vote. However, some days later the focus has shifted entirely to security, as described in my pinned post, where it remains to this day. Security will always be our number one priority as long as real funds are involved. Listings do not matter if security is compromised. We publicly commit to eventually listing on Hyperliquid spot, but porting a bridge and a token to a new chain is not a quick task on the side. Once all essential network updates are released, we will prioritize this, along with all other plans that were previously announced.

You can spend your time and energy on conferences, podcasts, posturing, promises, narratives, chasing flavors of the month, faking metrics and propping up ecosystem dev activity, all of which inevitably leads to some drama. Or you can spend it on the tech.

The node release will be glorious, and will leave no excuses.

Simple obfuscation of wallets, transfers and programs doesn't feel like the endgame for privacy. Operating directly on encrypted data does. FHE ties it all together neatly, with nodes performing heavy but meaningful tasks, while keeping the state composable and verifiable.

An in-depth overview of the @octra bridge by @DefiLlama Research team is out. It covers how assets can move between public and private states, and not just chains. The bridge is becoming a standalone product, and also part of a broader EVM privacy stack being released gradually.