Replying to @jotto
won't a DevOps agent be the inevitable conclusion? e.g. deploy this code on whichever platform makes the most sense and keep it running.
Replying to @hallmarkt @simpsoka
We originally were considering a vestaboard, but it felt pretty limiting in the types of things we wanted to display. Check eBay for used boards. That’s how we kept the cost down.
Replying to @passtheguap @simpsoka
We found used panels on eBay. So total was between 2-3k. I’m looking for ways to make it more affordable for hobbyists.
kelly retweeted
I made a giant javascript powered flipdisc display for my office with @korevec. Here is a little bit about flipdisc displays, and how to make your own! - a thread 🧵
Replying to @sfbike @californiapuc
I can no longer support @sfbike after this decision. AVs are forced to follow the rules of the road. Human drivers will always be distracted. This is a regressive decision that lacks solid data and will ultimately harm the cyclists of SF.
Replying to @Pflax1
magiceden.io/marketplace/bik… 181/10000 sold. Selling NFTs to athletes is going swimmingly 😬
@myrnamelgar I know you're a supporter of Vision Zero & bike advocacy in SF. I bike my son to school on Teresita Blvd & constantly feel unsafe doing so. Because it's a high traffic thoroughfare I would love to see a dedicated bike lane. Let's prioritize safe streets over parking.
Replying to @iRunFar @AravaipaRunning
Nick has proven again that he’s figured out the secret of Hardrock. Go Nick!
kelly retweeted
BREAKING: Supervisors vote 7-4 to approve Mayor @LondonBreed's legislation to make #CarFreeJFK permanent. ‼️
@myrnamelgar thank you for your vote today in favor of #CarFreeJFK 🥳 We’re excited to go for a ride!
kelly retweeted
It appears #CarFreeJFK will be made a reality today!
My diligent colleague @thejdmorris counts six yes votes. Mandelman, Preston, Haney, Melgar, Mar and Ronen. How many more supervisors will join them in keeping this treasure permanent? #TotalSF
sfchronicle.com/sf/article/c…
Replying to @pkedrosky
I agree on TP, and I personally know they've tried to branch out. But I think they really struggle convincing the old guard to evolve.
Replying to @pkedrosky
It's because there isn't a large enough market of athletes that need/want that level of data analysis. source: spent a decade building training tools for 2 million+ athletes




