Joined August 2012
Cox¯\_(ツ)_/¯⚡️ retweeted
Har noen en god forklaring på dette? HVORFOR er det i det hele tatt lovlig for en administrerende direktør i staten å SAMTIDIG ha flere styreverv? Statsbyggsjefen er styreleder i Nye Veier as OG medlem i 4 andre statlig styrer! Det er jo ikke mulig for han å ha 100% fokus på Statsbygg som er ansvarlig for regjeringskvartalet, så da blir det jo uunngåelig 10-talls milliardsprekker der! Bare fordi at han skal få 1,5 mill ekstra i godtgjørelser fra sine styreverv, så skal alle vi andre betale titalls milliarder ekstra. Hvorfor i alle dager er det ikke en selvfølge at en administrativ direktør i staten IKKE skal ha andre styreverv som distraherer han fra hovedjobben hans? Og det finnes 100-vis av slike eksempler som han!
Når du bestemmer hvem som bestemmer, men ikke har ansvar for hva de bestemmer🙃
9
64
1
447
8,598
The hottest day ever officially recorded in Australia, using a standard Stevenson screen at a government weather station, was 125 °F (51.7 °C) on Sunday, 3 January 1909, at Bourke, New South Wales. For decades this was long recognised as Australia’s hottest day. However, it didn’t fit the “global warming” narrative. For if, as alarmists assert that “climate change” is causing unprecedented record heat, how could our hottest-ever day have occurred back in 1909? So just as Orwell described in 1984, the Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) rewrote history. "Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute ….. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” The BOM’s excuse for erasing this record was that the observer at the Bourke Post Office in January 1909 supposedly made a mistake. "Observer error" someone at the BOM decided from a desk in Canberra a century later. The BOM’s justification for declaring it a “mistake” was the assertion that no nearby weather station recorded a similar temperature spike on the same day, so therefore the 125 °F reading at Bourke must have been an error. But that claim by the BOM is a LIE. Before COVID, I personally visited the Australian National Archives to examine the original handwritten meteorological observation books because I no longer trusted the BOM after some of their earlier data manipulations. The archived observation book from the official weather station at Brewarrina — the nearest official station to Bourke, just 100 km away — recorded a maximum temperature of 50.6 °C (123 °F) on the very same day in January 1909. The hottest temperature ever recorded there. Thus, we had two official government weather stations only 100 km apart both independently recorded extreme heat on the same day: Bourke 125 °F and Brewarrina 123 °F. Game, set, match. The Bourke record must be reinstated and the BOM held accountable for their malfeasance and fraudulent attempt to rewrite our history. One of my regrets is that the human-rights abuses inflicted upon Australians during the COVID years, along with the malfeasance at the TGA, distracted me from pursuing this matter in Parliament further at the time. Any organisation that can so brazenly and fraudulently tamper with historical data, as the BOM has done, simply cannot be trusted. I’d bet London to a brick that the very same people at the BOM who fraudulently altered our climate history have their fingers all over the $100 million of taxpayers’ money they’ve spent “updating their website”. There should be a full investigation into the Bureau of Meteorology. I volunteer to head it.
I wonder on the BOMs new $100 million website, how much historical data they purged ?
161
1,279
77
5,293
70,405
Cox¯\_(ツ)_/¯⚡️ retweeted
In 1893 a Norwegian scientist deliberately froze his ship into the Arctic ice, let it drift for three years, and lost not a single man to scurvy or anything else. Then he walked off it and spent nine months in a hole in the ground eating bear. Fridtjof Nansen was thirty-two, a zoologist with a doctorate on the nervous system of a worm. His theory was that the polar current would carry a ship across the top of the world if the ship was built not to be crushed. He built one. He called it the Fram, took twelve men, and sailed into the pack. For three years they lived in the dark and the cold with no fresh food arriving from anywhere. On every previous expedition that had meant scurvy, the disease that had killed more sailors than the sea. Nansen's crew had none. They shot polar bear and seal, and ate the meat fresh and barely cooked, as the Inuit did. The doctor on board had almost nothing to do. In 1895 Nansen and one companion left the ship on skis to make for the Pole. They got further north than any human had been, turned back, and were caught by winter on an empty island. They built a hut of stones and walrus hide, and for nine months they ate bear meat and walrus blubber and nothing else. No vegetable, no grain, no fruit. They came out in the spring fatter than they went in. Then they walked home. Nansen went on to win the Nobel Peace Prize, and lived to 68. Every schoolchild is taught that a diet without vegetables will rot you from the inside. Two men spent a winter underground on nothing but fat and meat and came out fit to walk across the Arctic, and that was 130 years ago.
295
3,427
120
22,403
724,293
Cox¯\_(ツ)_/¯⚡️ retweeted
Scotland 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Nothing “green” about ripping up peatland and felling trees to build wind turbines while releasing 4.9 million tons of CO2.
57
650
24
1,482
15,216
Cox¯\_(ツ)_/¯⚡️ retweeted
Activist: "The difference is nothing died for my dinner." Farmer: "What did you have?" Activist: "Rice, roast veg, hummus, a bit of bread. Oat milk in my tea." Farmer: "The rice." Activist: "Grown in a paddy." Farmer: "A flooded field, drained for harvest. Frogs, fish, snails, eels, all of it dies in the mud. Then the combine. The veg?" Activist: "Carrots, peppers, courgettes." Farmer: "Carrots are a ploughed field. I've ploughed. The gulls follow the tractor because of what comes up in pieces. Peppers and courgettes are a polytunnel. Slug pellets, and a hive of bees trucked in to pollinate them, then the hive's left to die at the end of the season because it's cheaper than feeding it. The hummus?" Activist: "Chickpeas." Farmer: "Sprayed with something to kill the plant so it dries evenly for the combine. I've done that too. Whatever's living in it dries out with it. Mice, voles, leverets, partridge chicks. Twelve miles an hour, a blade eight metres wide. The bread?" Activist: "...Wheat." Farmer: "Same field, same machine, plus the rats in the grain store and what's done about them. Your oat milk's the same again, with a factory on the end." Activist: "Those are all accidents." Farmer: "I've killed more voles with a plough than I ever have with a bolt gun, and I'm the one with the bolt gun. One bullock off that hill is one death and a year's dinners. Your plate's about forty and you didn't see any of them." Activist: "At least I didn't choose it." Farmer: "You chose to be the only one at the table who didn't know."
75
1,446
30
10,547
1,289,192
Cox¯\_(ツ)_/¯⚡️ retweeted
I have made a video explaining the difference between folic acid and folate, why people got confused between the two and the way the language remains distorted as a result.
What is folic acid? What is folate? What is Faux-late?
35
881
21
1,623
42,205
Cox¯\_(ツ)_/¯⚡️ retweeted
Dear Pharma- and Gates-funded GAVI: your post undermines your claim because the studies you cite do not support that vaccines do not cause increased risk and chronic disease. Anyone who actually reads what you cite will conclude as much and will likely decide to no longer trust you or the products you promote. That is called “thinking” or “informed consent” which you will then label as “vaccine hesitancy” or “anti-vax.”
❓“Will giving my baby multiple vaccines at once overload their immune system?” The quick answer: No. Decades of studies confirm that multiple vaccines don’t overwhelm immunity, don’t increase infection risk and don’t cause chronic illness. Research shows that a baby’s immune system can handle multiple vaccines at once. The concern about "overload" comes from a misunderstanding of how immunity works. For example, mild post-vaccination side effects like fever are actually signs the immune system is working properly. And not only that, delaying vaccines leaves kids unprotected and at significant risk. The vaccine schedule is designed to protect kids exactly when they need it most. Read more: bit.ly/3VyWfXZ
42
458
13
1,467
18,022
Cox¯\_(ツ)_/¯⚡️ retweeted
Sør-Norge ligger fremdeles på bunnen, aldri hatt lavere fylling i vannmagasinene i statistikken til NVE. Kriseåret 2022 hadde på dette tidspunktet kommet opp på høyere nivåer, men det var fortsatt «stram forsyningssituasjon» og muligheter for strømrasjonering, i følge Statnett.
10
4
53
4,640
Cox¯\_(ツ)_/¯⚡️ retweeted
🇬🇧 This is proper British (oh hush you progressives) A 76 year old man is before the courts with a test of equality before the law! … pay attention. Timothy Miller was arrested for wearing a burka at an anti-migration protest. So he’s turned up to court wearing it AGAIN! Because Section 157 of the Crime and Policing Act 2026 provides a defence for face coverings worn for religious observance… It doesn’t say ONLY women. It doesn’t say ONLY Muslims. And the Equality Act protects religion or belief, while Article 9 protects the freedom to CHANGE religion. And clever Mr Miller says he’s “exploring Islam” So now the court is screwed (not a legal technical term) and must decide whether his actions qualify as ‘religious observance’ Because the law must be applied EQUALLY, regardless of sex, religion or political opinions. He’s challenging whether equality before the law really means equality for EVERYONE. (I think I love him) And I think that’s bloody brilliant!.. now we have to see if the law is going to show its cards! … Will it discriminate against this white man? exploring his religion? … of course it will. And then you will know … that this brave man took one for the team. Come on Team Britain 💣
616
5,180
313
24,742
411,356
Cox¯\_(ツ)_/¯⚡️ retweeted
Jeg er en av mange levende mennesker av kjøtt og blod som har blitt beskyldt for å være russisk robot som spammer ned sosiale medier med russisk propaganda. Det har sine komiske sider. For da nyheten om at Kiev hadde bombet tre russiske datasentre, var det en som var overrasket over at det fortsatt var liv i meg, "roboten". Og det var det som fikk ham til å skjønne at jeg ikke er en robot. Bombingen skal ha redusert "bot-trafikken" på amerikanske og europeiske sosiale medier med 90 %, har mange hevdet. Men: «Det tok ikke lang lang tid før historien falt fra hverandre. Common Consultancy, en skandinavisk NGO som tidligere har anklaget Russland for å orkestrere påvirkningskampanjer på sosiale medier, konkluderte med at det ikke var 'noen synlig effekt' på pro-MAGA- eller pro-AfD-innlegg på sosiale medier etter Yandex-angrepene. Leonid Volkov, en anti-Kreml-aktivist tilknyttet den avdøde opposisjonsfiguren Alexey Navalny, kritiserte Zdechovsky for å spre 'tull og løgn'. CeMAS, en liberal tysk tenketank, uttalte at de 'ikke så en nedgang i antall innlegg som kunne forklares med et angrep på datasentre'. Hasso Plattner-instituttet og Polisphere, to ideelle teknologiorganisasjoner, var enige, og tyske aviser begynte stille å redigere artiklene sine mandag kveld ...... Da historien ble avslørt og korrigert, var skaden skjedd. I offentlighetens øyne var angrepene knyttet til en nedgang i 'russisk bot'-aktivitet, og ingen av talerne på Warszawas sikkerhetsforum, inkludert høytstående ukrainske, polske og litauiske tjenestemenn, gadd å korrigere oppføringen.» rt-english.com/news/647149-y…
7
7
61
727
Nei, Støre. Våre barn fortjener ikke å dø for deg og dine likesinnede.
59
53
7
511
6,396
Cox¯\_(ツ)_/¯⚡️ retweeted
Fin ytring fra @JonasNoeland. Han påpeker at over halvparten av regningen for vindkraft havner på nettleien vår... 💸
14
55
3
317
4,016
Cox¯\_(ツ)_/¯⚡️ retweeted
Now we are seeing what really went on with these trials. They were gamed to conclude exactly what they did conclude. A new report by Argentina's regulators exposes the truth. As usual, @MaryanneDemasi has a precise and clear analysis. BREAKING: Misconduct at Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine trial site in Argentina, by @MaryanneDemasi open.substack.com/pub/maryan…
17
317
9
707
14,274
Cox¯\_(ツ)_/¯⚡️ retweeted
Høye priser, stor eksport. Sørvest-Norge har blitt det verste stedet nord for Østersjøen å drive virksomhet med behov for elektrisk kraft.
2
11
52
747
Cox¯\_(ツ)_/¯⚡️ retweeted
There is a mountain of unworn clothes in the driest desert on earth, large enough to be photographed from space. It grows by 39,000 tons a year and almost none of it will ever rot. The Atacama, in northern Chile, is a place where it may not rain for a decade. On its edge is a duty-free port called Iquique. Every year about 59,000 tons of clothing arrives there from Europe, America and Asia. It is last season's stock that never sold, and the bags people leave at charity shops. Dealers pick through it for anything they can resell across South America. Two thirds of it is worthless. Nobody will pay to ship it back out, so lorries drive it into the desert at night and tip it. The local landfill refuses to take it. The reason given is that the clothing does not biodegrade and is full of chemicals. Most of it is polyester, which is plastic, and in a place with no rain and no soil life it will lie there for centuries. Some of it is set alight, and the smoke drifts over a town of 100,000 people. In 2025 a Chilean court ruled that the dumps had done serious damage to the land. For most of history this could not have happened. Clothes were wool, linen and leather. They were worn out, handed down and patched, and at the very end a rag merchant paid for the scraps. In Yorkshire, from 1813, old woollens were shredded and spun into new cloth. Anything left went on the fields, where wool breaks down in months and feeds the grass. Nobody ever had to find a desert for worn-out wool. We invented a fabric that cannot die, and then we started making it to be thrown away.
423
6,545
456
17,599
855,506
Cox¯\_(ツ)_/¯⚡️ retweeted
Kunsten å gi Norge dyr strøm Siden den meningsløse elektrifiseringen av oljevirksomheten begynte (innspart gass brennes av kunder), har forbruket av landstrøm på sokkelen økt fra 0 til 11 TWh i 2025, eller ca. 9 prosent av landets totale forbruk. Planen er å øke til 20 TWh.
7
18
104
1,337
Cox¯\_(ツ)_/¯⚡️ retweeted
I've been unfair to vegetables. Six years into carnivore, I can admit they are extremely good for you. The trouble is that almost nobody prepares them properly. Steaming doesn't do it. Roasting doesn't do it. A smoothie is just an assault. A plant is a locked box, built by something that did not want to be eaten, and a kitchen cannot open it. The correct method: - Take 25 tonnes of mixed greens, raw - Chew each mouthful forty times, then bring it back up and do it again - Ferment at 39 degrees, sealed, for two days - Strain off the oxalates, the lectins and the roughage - Reduce slowly over two years - Rest, then sear in butter Makes about 250 kilos. It is a lot of work, so I have somebody in. He does it standing in a field.
76
253
14
2,478
56,936
Cox¯\_(ツ)_/¯⚡️ retweeted
Det vil komme en tid da havvind vil høre fortiden til, være noe man snakket om før. Kostnadene er drepen for dem. De lar seg ikke snakke bort, regningen kommer, og er for høy. share.google/fNVAjY2QsUZlDzq…
3
19
135
1,331
It is not the whole truth, but completely true.
10
Cox¯\_(ツ)_/¯⚡️ retweeted
In 1992 a Cairo surgeon found a male contraceptive that worked on every man who wore it, and it was a scrap of polyester. Ahmed Shafik ran the department of surgery at Cairo University. He took 14 healthy men and fitted each with a polyester sling to hold the testicles, worn day and night for a year and changed only when it needed a wash. Between four and five months in, all 14 had no sperm at all. Zero. They stayed at zero for the rest of the year. He took the slings off and waited. The counts came back, on average, about five months later. A biopsy at six months had shown the tubes that make sperm degenerating, and the damage was still visible half a year after the polyester came off. He had already tried it on rats. In 1993 he dressed 75 of them in tiny trousers of cotton, wool, polyester or a polyester blend and left them in them for up to a year. The rats in polyester mated noticeably less often. The rats in wool carried on as rats do. He tried dogs next. A dozen in polyester pants, a dozen in cotton, for two years. The cotton dogs were unchanged. The polyester dogs' counts fell, their abnormal sperm rose, and two of them still had not recovered a year later. He measured the static the fabric built up as it rubbed against skin, and blamed that. Cotton built up none. He published all of it, called the sling a safe and reversible method of contraception, and in 2016 was given an Ig Nobel Prize, the award for research that makes people laugh first and think afterwards. Between 1973 and 2018, sperm counts across the world fell by more than half. Over the same years polyester went from a novelty to the most worn fibre on earth, 59% of everything spun in 2024, and now standard in sports underwear, gym shorts, bedsheets and the school uniform. A surgeon put fourteen men in it and switched their fertility off like a tap. The rest of us are still wearing the trial.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Shafik's 1992 study used a tight polyester sling worn continuously 24/7; not typical clothing and unreplicated. No evidence links everyday polyester to azoospermia or global sperm declines. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1623716/ pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC65… theweek.in/news/health/20…
76
929
69
3,073
74,168