oh my god.
Colorado, USA
Joined February 2009
- Tweets36.9K
- Following1.8K
- Followers970
- Likes152K
Update?
Remember when they said Trump would get us into a full-blown war with Iran?
Times like these should make us all realize how lucky we were to have Trump, his strength and his resolve.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Trump got us into a war with Iran.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_…
Knoxlette retweeted
Trump just confirmed ‘Russiagate’ was real, lol
Knoxlette retweeted
God does not bless any conflict. Anyone who is a disciple of Christ, the Prince of Peace, is never on the side of those who once wielded the sword and today drop bombs. Military action will not create space for freedom or times of #Peace, which comes only from the patient promotion of coexistence and dialogue among peoples.
Knoxlette retweeted
Voted for Donald Trump & I got:
1. War
2. Israel 🇮🇱 First
3. Higher gas $
4. Large deficits
5. More spending
6. Higher grocery $
7. Higher clothing $
8. Higher vehicle $
9. 401K losses
10. Investments down
11. Devaluation of the dollar.
I’m FUCKING retarded. God I’m sorry.
*whiny* “This isn’t what I voted for.”
Shut up, sit down, never vote again. You’re an idiot. This is *exactly* what you voted for. You’re an embarrassment.
Knoxlette retweeted
He is insane.
I am as MAGA as they get. I was a Front Row Joe, 42 rallies, walked the halls of congress 3 times for Trump, became a state delegate, then a national delegate ALL TO SUPPORT TRUMP.
He has absolutely lost me, in fact I'm eyeing the 25th amendment for him because he's lost his damn mind.
Knoxlette retweeted
1. Today Sec. Kristi Noem made the extraordinary (but vaguely delivered) claim that as head of DHS, she has authorities over elections, including to make sure that “the right people are voting and electing the right leaders to lead this country.” That is false.
Knoxlette retweeted
Costs from Trump's tariffs paid almost entirely by US consumers, NY Fed says bbc.in/4aA6T4B
Knoxlette retweeted
So let’s stop the games.
If you want this fight, @RepJamesComer, let’s have it—in public.
You love to talk about transparency. There’s nothing more transparent than a public hearing, cameras on.
We will be there.
Knoxlette retweeted
Journalists, please remember that repeating obviously false statements is not balance or fairness. It is actively participating in deception.
Knoxlette retweeted
. @SenFettermanPA it’s past time to retract this ridiculous statement, say you regret voting for Kristi Noem and Pam Bondi, and step up for us and the Constitution. Where are you.
Knoxlette retweeted
Okay so,
1) an American citizen exercises his First Amendment right to peaceably assemble and his Second Amendment right to bear arms, out of apparent concern that a tyrannical federal government is violating basic protections afforded under the Constitution
2) after coming to the aid of an unarmed woman who's been shoved to the ground by a masked federal agent, the citizen -- impaired by pepper spray, holding nothing but a cell phone -- is dragged to the ground by a group of other masked agents
3) during the scuffle, shortly after one masked agent removes the weapon from the restrained citizen's person, several other masked agents open fire, unloading 10 shots from close range and killing the unarmed citizen
4) despite video evidence, a spokesman for the federal government says the citizen approached agents with a gun, provoked a violent confrontation, and planned to "massacre" law enforcement
You really want to defend this? Go ahead. Just know, you look like an absolute fool.
Knoxlette retweeted
This sentiment from the First Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California is dangerous and wrong.
Responsible public voices should be awaiting a full investigation, not making generalizations and demonizing law-abiding citizens.
If you approach law enforcement with a gun, there is a high likelihood they will be legally justified in shooting you.
Don’t do it!
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The U.S. Constitution (particularly the 2nd, 4th, and 14th amendments) prohibit officers from shooting citizens merely for possessing a weapon that is not an “imminent threat”. This was reaffirmed in Graham v Connor, which says force must be reasonable.
supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/…
justice.gov/jm/1-16000-dep….
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitut…
There is no weaker being on that planet than a conservative.
They’re taking your 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, and 6th Amd rights away and you’re just excited that they’re killing your countrymen because you disagree with them about shit like education spending.
Fucking embarrassing.
Knoxlette retweeted
Videos analyzed by The New York Times appear to contradict accounts given by Homeland Security officials about the shooting. They said the man approached Border Patrol agents with a handgun and the intent to "massacre" them. Footage of the encounter shows the man holding a phone in his hand, not a gun, when agents take him to the ground. nytimes.com/live/2026/us/min…
Knoxlette retweeted
Question: But the president’s statements that he believed the election was rife with fraud—those are statements protected by the First Amendment, correct?
Smith: Absolutely not. If they are made to target a lawful government function and are made with knowing falsity, then no, they are not. That was my point about fraud not being protected by the First Amendment.
Question: There’s a long history of candidates speaking out about what they believe is fraud or other problems with the integrity of the election process. And I think you would agree that those kinds of statements are at the core of a presidential candidate’s First Amendment rights, right?
Smith: There is no historical analog for what President Trump did in this case.