Jean’s Daughter retweeted
The French need to stop with the performative guilt over Algeria. They need to cast aside the effete pseudo-culture of chintz promulgated since Louis XIV.
They need to get violent.
« La France aux Français »
Cette expression est apparue dans le discours public français dès 1889, dans un contexte de nationalisme liés à la peur d’une « invasion » étrangère (concurrence économique, main-d’œuvre immigrée, etc.) sous la IIIe République. Drumont l’a ensuite popularisée de sorte que l’expression est devenue la préférée de la droite nationaliste en France.
Je répète: 1889.
Depuis la fin du XIXe siècle, la France est passée d’une immigration essentiellement européenne et limitée à des flux massifs et majoritairement africains (Maghreb et Afrique subsaharienne). Aujourd’hui, les immigrés représentent environ 11-12 % de la population (près de 8 millions), dont près de la moitié d’origine africaine, et avec leurs descendants de 2e génération ils forment déjà un quart à un tiers de la population selon les définitions. La fécondité nettement plus élevée des femmes originaires du Maghreb et d’Afrique subsaharienne, combinée à des entrées annuelles de l’ordre de 300 000 immigrés et à la faible natalité des natives, accélère cette transformation.
La France ne produit pas (à dessein?) de statistiques officielles sur la « race » ou l’origine génétique (« Français blancs de pure souche européenne ») mais on peut avoir une idée de l’âge médian comparatif en utilisant les proxys de l’INSEE/INED basés sur le lieu de naissance et l’origine des parents : les personnes ni immigrées ni descendantes d’immigrés (ni G1 ni G2). De l’exercice, il ressort que l’âge médian des « Français de souche » est nettement plus élevé que celui des immigrés.
Et ces Français de souche continuent néanmoins de voter pour des politiques migratoires qui contribuent à leur propre dissolution.
Alors quand plusieurs d’entre vous me traitez de tous les noms pour avoir osé nommer une évidence, sachez que je m’en fous: la vérité primera toujours sur ma page et je vous emmerde.
Jean’s Daughter retweeted
There is no limit to how much you can hate them, it’ll just keep increasing with each atrocity like this until they’re finally driven out
These people are animals, literal animals, they are worth nothing
Jean’s Daughter retweeted
My kid:
“Dad, why do some coins have ridges on the edge?”
Me:
Sets up projector.
Plugs in laptop.
Clears throat.
Cracks knuckles.
Jean’s Daughter retweeted
Disappointed. I wanted to see the Trojan horse military terrorist executed on live stream Trump TV. Huge ratings. @realDonaldTrump
Jean’s Daughter retweeted
Its pretty wild to see some of MAGA use the assassination of Charlie Kirk to get you to vote red when the very reason Charlie was killed is because he would have stood against what Trump has done.
That's why he's not here.
Jean’s Daughter retweeted
Trannies will be gathering in degenerate hordes to vote for Trotsky’s new DSA because they have one mission: make every child gender confused, and destroy Whites permanently.
These are dangerous times.
Jean’s Daughter retweeted
the intensity of a woman's orgasm is directly proportional to the length of the arousal period that preceded it. a 5 minute arousal period produces a mild orgasm. a 20 minute arousal period produces a moderate orgasm. a 45 minute arousal period produces the orgasm she describes to her friends. the correlation is not linear. it is exponential. the difference between 20 minutes and 45 minutes of buildup is not twice the orgasm. it is a categorically different neurological event.
the mechanism is vasocongestion accumulation. arousal causes blood to flow into the pelvic tissue. the tissue engorges. the engorgement increases nerve sensitivity. more engorgement means more sensitivity means a stronger signal sent to the brain during orgasm. the amount of blood in the pelvic tissue at the moment of orgasm determines the intensity of the contractions and the subjective experience. 5 minutes of arousal produces partial engorgement. 20 minutes produces moderate engorgement. 45 minutes produces maximum engorgement.
the relationship between time and intensity explains why the "quickie" almost never produces a strong female orgasm. the quickie works for men because male arousal reaches peak engorgement in 2 to 5 minutes. the female erectile tissue (which is 4 inches of internal structure surrounding the vaginal canal) requires 15 to 25 minutes for full engorgement and 30 to 45 minutes for maximum engorgement. the quickie ends before the system reaches its potential.
the slow start principle: begin with the lowest intensity stimulation and increase over time. start with non genital touch (back, neck, thighs). progress to peripheral genital touch (outer labia, pubic mound, inner thighs near the genitals). progress to indirect clitoral stimulation (through the hood, around the glans). arrive at direct clitoral stimulation last. each stage builds engorgement. each stage increases sensitivity for the next stage. the final stage (direct stimulation) contacts tissue that has been building blood flow for 20 to 30 minutes and is now maximally sensitive.
the opposite approach (starting with direct clitoral stimulation from minute one) contacts tissue that is not yet engorged and therefore not yet maximally sensitive. the stimulation is received by a partially prepared system. the orgasm that results is smaller because the infrastructure wasn't fully built. starting directly is not faster. it is less efficient. the slow start reaches a stronger orgasm in less total stimulation time because the infrastructure is complete when the stimulation arrives.
the men who are described as "amazing in bed" are not doing anything technically different during the orgasm itself. they are doing everything differently in the 30 minutes before it. the slow start builds the infrastructure. the orgasm detonates the infrastructure. the size of the detonation depends on the size of what was built. build more. detonate more. the investment is time. the return is exponential.































