Bull morning 🐂 Payday is near🚀🚀🚀 Another day to be grateful. Let's go MAKE $ANSEM GREAT AGAIN.

Current Supply Concentration (Oct 15 Snapshot + Recent Community Updates) Two Ansem-linked wallets held ~580.4M tokens (~58.2% of ~997.4M remaining supply) as of mid-October: Active airdrop wallet (original recipient). Second wallet that received a large internal transfer (~491M) in late July/early August and has remained largely unmoved (community notes suggest custody arrangements such as BitGo). No sales of $ANSEM by these wallets were recorded on Solana DEXs through the Bitquery cutoff. Roughly 74M tokens have been airdropped from the active wallet in stages (heavy batches late June, smaller drips afterward). .Approximate distribution (Oct 15): .Ansem-linked: 58.2% .Top 17 other holders: 8.6% .Exchange hot wallets: 1.5% .DEX pools: 1.6% .Everyone else (~150k+ wallets): 30.2% Recent community snapshots (mid-to-late October) put holders around 151–153k and top-10 concentration near 65%. The structure remains extremely top-heavy.

Bull morning 🐂 Payday is near🚀🚀🚀 Another day to be grateful. Let's go MAKE $ANSEM GREAT AGAIN.

And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God (1 Corinthians 6:11). Did you know that as one who’s born again, it’s wrong for you to keep seeing yourself as “a sinner?” Many live with this mentality and it reveals why they’re ineffective in their Christian walk. Now that you’re born again, your life is new and divine; therefore, embrace the picture of the new you. You’re the righteousness of God in Christ Jesus; as Jesus is, so are you in this world. Have a greater consciousness of your new life in Christ. That life gives you power to live above sin. You may ask, “If this is true, why do I still do wrong things and think wrong thoughts?” It’s because you haven’t fully yielded and subjected yourself to the dominion of the Word, to live in, and by the Word. The account in 1 Corinthians 6:9-11. The Apostle Paul rebuked some of the Christians in Corinth because their way of life didn’t reflect the new nature of righteousness they had received. Yet, he didn’t call them “sinners.” He writes, “Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God” (1 Corinthians 6:9-11). Notice he didn’t say, “And such are some of you…”; rather, he says, “…and such were some of you,” because now that you’re in Christ, you’ve been cleansed of all unrighteousness. You’ve been washed; separated from sin unto God, and declared righteous, in the Name of the Lord, and by the Spirit of our God! Recognise your new identity; see the picture of the new you and live accordingly. Study and meditate on the Word; it shows your real glory; it reveals your true personality. You’re the righteousness of God in Christ Jesus! I hope you can understand my sunesis in the gospel of Christ.

Alot of Christians are using their traditions, cultures and even upbringing to understand the gospel. One of the most important principles for understanding the Scriptures is recognising contexts and target audience. Some become confused in their study of God's Word when they read verses without considering their actual context, audience, and purpose. Not everything written in Scripture applies to the new creation. The Apostle Paul demonstrated this clearly in Romans chapter three. After quoting several passages that described the condition of those under the Law, he made a remarkable statement: “Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law...” (Romans 3:19). Did you notice that? The Law spoke to those who were under its jurisdiction. Paul wanted this understanding to be clearly established, and it’s vital because many have read the declaration, “...There is none righteous, no, not one” (Romans 3:10), and assumed it applies equally to everyone today, including those who are born again.But Paul wasn't describing the new creation in Christ. He was presenting the Law's verdict on those who lived under the old covenant. The context makes this unmistakably clear. When you understand who is being addressed, the Scriptures become clearer and more meaningful. You learn to distinguish between the Law and grace, between the Old Testament and the New Testament, and between what was spoken concerning man's condition apart from Christ and what is true of those who are now in Christ. This prevents confusion and helps you to rightly comprehend and apprehend God's truth. The Bible is a progressive unveiling of God's redemptive plan. Therefore, it's important to follow the flow of revelation in the Scriptures. Don't isolate a verse from its context and build your understanding around it. Study the whole counsel of God and allow Scripture to interpret Scripture. The Bible says, “Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth”(2 Timothy 2:15). As a child of God, always study and receive the Word in the light of your identity in Christ and the realities of the new creation. That's how God's Word produces faith, confidence and victories in your life.

In the New Testament, God doesn’t lead us through dreams. The Bible doesn’t say, “For as many as are led by dreams, they are the sons of God Rom 8:14”; rather, it says, “For as many as are led by the Spirit of God….” You might want to ask, “How about Acts 2:17; doesn’t it indicate that God still leads through dreams?” No; He doesn’t. When the Bible says in Acts 2:17, “…in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh…and your old men shall dream dreams…” ; dreams were for sense knowledge generation of men. And if you ever had a dream, a real dream that’s a message from the Lord, always, the focus would be on you; you’d be the theme of the dream; not someone else. God never gave anybody any dream about anybody else. Job said, “ God talks to men in a dream of the night to seal an instruction into them, to warn them from their destruction” (Read Job 33:15-18). That’s in the Old Testament. It was about them; not about other people. Some people believed some dreams that others had about them, and started looking for “deliverance”; that’s absurd. If you’re born again, God doesn’t send you a warning through someone else’s dream. Their dream is about them and not you. Don’t fear their fears and dreams. Since the Holy Spirit began His ministry with the church on the day of Pentecost in Acts chapter 2, none of the Apostles or anyone in the New Testament was ministered to in a dream. Today, as then, He guides you through the written Word, and through His light in your spirit; the inward witness. Howbeit, that inward voice or witness always bears record with the Word. He gives visions and diverse revelations, nonetheless, but not with other people’s dreams about you. He said “my sheep hear my voice…” (John 10:27). Therefore, don’t base your life on dreams; if you dream a dream that’s consistent with God’s plan for you, claim it in Jesus’ Name, otherwise throw it away and don’t dwell on it. Live on the Word and God’s provisions in Christ.

Bull morning 🐂 Payday is near🚀🚀🚀 Another day to be grateful. Let's go MAKE $ANSEM GREAT AGAIN.

This is the right mindset @blknoiz06 . The people who paid it forward in 2017 (and earlier) are a big reason a lot of us are even here. Keep doing it — the next generation needs the real, unfiltered lessons more than they need another polished “guru.” Criticism is just the cost of being useful in public.

10 critical discussion points from Ansem at @token2049 Singapore 2026, drawn primarily from the memecoin panel (“Memecoins: Dead or Just Getting Started?”) and the @MarketBubble Bubble Live session.​ 1️⃣Memecoins are pure attention assets Ansem stated that memecoins have no revenue and are driven entirely by collective belief and attention. All assets carry intangible value from belief; memecoins simply maximize that component. 2️⃣Attention is now highly fragmented He contrasted earlier cycles (e.g., Pepe in 2023 pre-pump.fun) with today, noting 30,000+ new coins launching daily. This makes extreme upside much harder without a strong differentiating factor. 3️⃣Need for a core differentiator Ansem argued that “another animal coin” is no longer enough. A memecoin needs a clear narrative edge or community distinction to stand out amid the flood of launches. 4️⃣Bitcoin as the original memecoin He called Bitcoin the first asset whose value came purely from collective belief that it could reach trillions, starting from zero. Because of this, he does not see any memecoin flipping Bitcoin. 5️⃣Directional agreement with Murad Ansem agreed that Murad’s core thesis is directionally correct: there will be a premium on assets and individuals that command real belief, strong communities, or movement-like characteristics. 6️⃣Rejection of a trillion-dollar pure memecoin flip While open to the idea of larger belief-driven assets, he pushed back on the notion that a conventional memecoin would ever surpass Bitcoin in market position. 7️⃣Improved crypto fundamentals despite price levels In the Market Bubble session, Ansem (as moderator) and the panel highlighted better user experience, institutional progress, and stronger product-market fit compared to previous cycles—even with lower prices. 8️⃣Crypto blending into finance Discussion centered on the blurring line between crypto and traditional finance through tokenized stocks, stablecoins, perpetual futures, and platforms like Robinhood integrating both. 9️⃣Institutional buyers supporting shallower drawdowns The panel noted that institutional participation (e.g., via ETFs and accessible products) has likely contributed to milder and shorter bear markets compared to prior cycles. 🔟Memecoins as ongoing retail attention vehicle Across sessions, Ansem framed memecoins/MemeFi as a persistent on-chain mechanism for retail capital and attention, rather than a temporary fad, while emphasizing the need for better retention mechanisms.

Bull morning 🐂 Payday is near🚀🚀🚀 Another Sunday to be grateful. Let's go MAKE $ANSEM GREAT AGAIN.

This is the cleanest framing I’ve seen of why the usual cycle maps keep feeling off. The four-year rhythm was mostly a reflection of who was in the market: a relatively closed set of crypto natives recycling capital on a halving-driven narrative. Once the marginal buyer becomes large allocators treating BTC as a permanent portfolio sleeve rather than a trade, the shape of the cycle changes. Those buyers don’t sell the same way retail does, and they don’t wait for the same signals. What strengthens the case further is the second leg you mentioned — the cash-flowing onchain businesses. When real, recurring revenue shows up (trading, stablecoin rails, certain DeFi protocols), the capital that shows up isn’t purely speculative. It’s the same type of money that underwrites growth equity or public software companies. That capital is slower to arrive and stickier once it does. It doesn’t need a parabolic chart to justify itself; it needs a durable business. The combination matters. Structural bid under BTC from institutions, plus a growing set of onchain businesses that can actually absorb larger checks without relying on the next memecoin rotation, creates a different feedback loop than prior cycles. Drawdowns can still be sharp, but the recovery mechanism is broader and less dependent on crypto Twitter sentiment flipping. Most cycle models still assume the buyer base is roughly the same as 2017 or 2021. If that assumption is wrong, the upside surprise isn’t a stretch — it’s the base case.

Bull morning 🐂 Payday is near🚀🚀🚀 Another day to be grateful. Let's go MAKE $ANSEM GREAT AGAIN.

$ANSEM for life🚀🚀🚀

@token2049 Yes — Ansem @blknoiz06 is right, and the data from this cycle keeps confirming it. The social token / creator-coin thesis is one of the cleanest frameworks in memecoins right now. @dogecoin remains the purest proof: a community that already had culture got sustained, high-status distribution from someone with @elonmusk reach, and the market structure changed. Most other memes are temporary attention rentals. The ones that stick tend to have an identity, a recurring content engine, and an audience that already feels ownership. Copy-paste dog/frog/cat variants without that gravity fade the moment the narrative rotates. Ansem has been consistent on this for a while. Influential individuals (and the networks around them) are becoming the primary distribution layer for memecoins. Technical novelty and “first of its kind” stories matter less than whether a project can turn attention into a sticky culture that compounds. The projects that build their own lore, rituals, and ongoing reason for people to show up outperform the ones just front-running whatever already worked. 📍What this implies next The next leg of this thesis is the productization of influencer distribution itself. We’re already seeing early versions: Explicit attention markets (burn or spend for visibility + automatic airdrops to an existing holder base) Creator tokens that try to combine memecoin acquisition with some real retention mechanism (content, tools, revenue share, gated access) Platforms that sit on top of existing launch rails (pump.fun etc.) and add an onchain reputation / distribution layer tied to a specific audience The real unlock most people are still underweighting is breaking out of the CT bubble. Ansem has said versions of this before: social tokens only scale if someone cracks mass onboarding of TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube audiences. Crypto Twitter is a high-signal but small distribution surface. The bigger opportunity is turning existing creator audiences (who already spend attention and money on personalities) into onchain holders and, ideally, users of trading, perps, or other crypto products. Secondary expectations that support the same view: More mid- and high-tier creators treating a token as a capital-efficient go-to-market and ownership layer rather than a pure meme Better alignment mechanisms so holders actually get something that compounds with the creator’s real business (podcast, terminal, media, merch, AI agents, etc.) instead of just price speculation Winners that develop distinct culture instead of optimizing for the current meta Pure copycats will keep launching and dying. The ones that matter will look more like “tokenized social networks / creator businesses with speculative upside” than classic memecoins. Ansem’s framing is directionally correct, and the infrastructure experiments around it are the logical next step.