Building all sorts of things

Miami
Joined January 2026
i've seen a lot of posts like this lately, where people bemoan the death of their hobbies, and it seems to boil down to one exact thing: they derive joy not from being able to do something themselves, but from others being unable to do it. if a random stranger failing to answer your quiz is enough to ruin your enjoyment of the hobby or the community, maybe you don't love it as much as you think you do.
Recently attended an in-person handheld game console hackathon. I wrote a raycaster by hand. Someone wearing a “I ❤️ slop” tshirt saw mine and said “oh I wrote a ray caster too!”. They showed me. It was a ray *tracer* and claude did all the work. The person didn’t know basic graphics terms. They couldn’t answer basic questions about how it worked, could only talk about their prompting harness. Sad how AI is ruining the craft and community for people that actually like to program and have spent their lives getting good at it.
127
118
22
1,821
67,605
the typa shi Open AI will have to do to beat Opus 5.5
25
24
1
830
7,925
Im so tired of openAI vague posting and hyping to end up shipping nothing good
21
WTH is this captcha lol
1
28
Yamil retweeted
I regret letting Codex ever run with a /goal prompt or launch sub-agents. It doesn't matter what model it is at this point. The Sol and Astra lineage are completely RL fried. It doesn't matter how tight the prompt is or the agent instructions are. I've even had prompts and instructions externally reviewed and rewritten, but it doesn't change the behavior. The model always goes off track, ignores scope, and finds a way to digress into scaffolding, certification machinery, evidence gathering or audits. Even with the literal words barring it from doing so are right there in the prompt, plan, or instruction file. And it always ends in an absolute mess of junk files, slop code, and an account drained of limits. Codex can only be used effectively through the tightest of handholding. Keep one-shotting whatever you want if it's working for you. But real work on an existing system is excruciating and nearly impossible. They are shipping models they know don't follow directions and are nearly useless for real long-horizon work.
232
57
45
1,365
114,437
i've made it dad🥹
16
might have went a little crazy trying to burn tokens lol
o yes… we’re back in action and we’ll reset usage limits for all paid users across codex and ChatGPT work sorry about the brief disruption! (and yes we have a special spare codex when things are down to help us out)
68
Small chatgpt feature that makes quality way better, it can show you the actual color next to the #
1
58
❌ Watch 10 minute video ✅ask ChatGPT and read it in 1 minute ✅Waste 5 minutes vague posting it on X
7
9
114
uhmmmm😥😥, do i even have a codebase left? i hope 5.6 sol xhigh knows what its doing atleast
12
11
163
So, i found the best way to have good quality, while also saving a ton in codex usage. basically, have Sol Xhigh create plans, and orchestrate Luna Max threads to implement it, and review their output and ship it. if when reviewing found something bad, it just tells it to fix it.
1
2
74
New Gemini model?? 👀 yall get ready for the last benchmaxxed release of the month
Gemini 3.5 Pro in the Arena So far I haven't seen any good outputs
194
Yamil retweeted
"lmaoooo leopold went from 45B to 10B what a loser, nice work buddy! " — Steve, $34,500 CAD net worth
186
252
37
7,980
675,576
There are new settings on the chatgpt desktop app. FINALLY i dont have to tell it to to be direct
76
mewthree model?👀👀
This quoted post is unavailable.
1
2,411
Yamil retweeted
Replying to @MarcosHernanz
Can you zoom in more on the y axis please
66
20
9
2,251
152,917
GPT-5.6 Pro may have just solved a COLT 2026 open problem. Under my prompting and direction, it produced a claimed proof that interaction is unnecessary for order-optimal 1-bit mean estimation—matching the adaptive rate for every k>1. Preprint: zenodo.org/records/21515740
1
119
Codex in a code base written mainly by Claude
33
60
9
1,987
81,661