Amazing exp 23 @NoMansSky
Cant wait for the next update or expedition
Many thanks and please take my money to continue improving the game
Btw please introduce more freighters and garage space for ship collectors
The bill doesn't change criminal law for animal abuse—citizens and non-citizens face identical state/federal penalties (fines, jail, animal bans) for the same acts.
It amends immigration law only. For illegal immigrants convicted of cruelty or fighting (misdemeanor or felony), it adds mandatory deportation and permanent bar to re-entry.
Citizens can't be deported, so consequences end at criminal sentencing. This prioritizes removal of those already here unlawfully who commit these crimes.
Replying to @khsolo @Polymarket
Yes, it's true. Google DeepMind's AlphaProof Nexus AI (using LLMs + Lean formal verification) autonomously solved 9 out of 353 open Erdős problems, per their arXiv preprint from May 21, 2026. Proofs are verified and public on GitHub.
Big step for AI in math.
Guillermo S retweeted
205 years ago today, Napoleon Bonaparte died on a tiny British prison island in the middle of the South Atlantic. He was 51. He had ruled most of Europe. And he changed the world so thoroughly that you are still living inside the systems he built.
Start with the obvious one. The Napoleonic Code. He commissioned it in 1800, sat in on the drafting sessions personally, argued with the lawyers, and pushed it through in four years. Equality before the law. Property rights. Religious freedom. The end of feudal privilege. It is still the basis of civil law in France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Portugal, most of Latin America, Quebec, Louisiana, and chunks of the Middle East and Africa. About a third of the planet writes contracts using rules a Corsican artillery officer wrote between battles.
He sold Louisiana to Thomas Jefferson in 1803 for 15 million dollars. Roughly four cents an acre. It doubled the size of the United States overnight. Without that deal there is no St. Louis, no New Orleans as an American city, no Lewis and Clark, no Manifest Destiny. The American century starts with Napoleon needing cash for a war.
He invaded Egypt in 1798 with an army and, weirdly, 167 scientists, mathematicians, and artists. They found the Rosetta Stone. That single slab is the reason we can read hieroglyphs at all. Egyptology as a field exists because Napoleon brought scholars to a war.
He built the Bank of France, which still runs French monetary policy. He created the lycée system that still educates French teenagers. He shoved the metric system across Europe at sword-point until it stuck. He emancipated the Jews of every territory he conquered, tearing down ghetto walls in Rome, Venice, Frankfurt. He abolished serfdom in Poland. He standardized road networks, civil registries, and tax codes that European governments still operate from.
And then there's the soldiering. He fought around 60 major battles and won most of them. Austerlitz, in 1805, against the combined Russian and Austrian empires, is still taught at West Point as one of the closest things to a tactically perfect battle ever fought. He was outnumbered, baited the enemy onto ground he had pre-selected, and broke them in a single afternoon. Three emperors took the field that morning. Only one walked off it on his own terms.
He slept four hours a night. He read constantly, dictated letters to four secretaries at the same time, and personally signed off on everything from cavalry boot specs to the seating chart at the Comédie-Française. Wellington, the man who finally beat him at Waterloo, was asked decades later who the greatest general in history was. He answered without hesitating. "In this age, in past ages, in any age, Napoleon."
He lost, in the end, because he could not stop. Russia in 1812 swallowed his army whole. Six hundred thousand men marched in. Maybe a tenth came back. He abdicated in 1814, escaped from Elba, ruled France again for 100 days, and lost it all for good in a wheat field in Belgium in June 1815.
The British shipped him to St. Helena, a volcanic dot 1,200 miles off the African coast, and waited. He spent six years there dictating his memoirs, gardening, complaining about the dampness, and quietly rewriting his own legend so effectively that Europe spent the next century arguing about him.
He died on May 5, 1821, during a storm so violent it ripped up the willow tree he liked to read under. His last words trailed off into fever. France. The army. Joséphine.
Nineteen years later France brought him home. Two million people stood in the snow to watch the coffin go by.
He was a tyrant. He was a reformer. He started wars that killed somewhere between three and six million people. He also wrote the rulebook that a third of humanity still lives under.
Most people who try to conquer the world are forgotten inside a generation. Napoleon has been dead for 205 years and we are still arguing about him because we are still using his furniture.
Guillermo S retweeted
if you think things are bad in the US, they're about to get worse. recommended reading 👇
xitter.cf/txgermanbre/status/205…
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
Guillermo S retweeted
Our warriors continue to apply sanctions against Russia’s shadow oil fleet – two such vessels were struck in the waters at the entrance to the port of Novorossiysk. These tankers had been actively used to transport oil – not anymore. I am grateful to Chief of the General Staff Andrii Hnatov for leading the operation, to the counterintelligence officers of the Security Service of Ukraine, and to our Navy for consistently delivering effective results. Ukraine’s long-range capabilities will continue to be developed comprehensively – at sea, in the air, and on land. Glory to Ukraine!
Guillermo S retweeted
Based on the results from April, our long-range sanctions have reached a new level across three components: reducing Russia’s oil revenues, as well as the range and intensity of sanctions. It is important that not only is the target itself reached, as defined by the operational objective, but that the downtime of the target is increased or, at the very least, its operations are significantly reduced.
According to the most conservative estimates, since the beginning of the year, the aggressor state has lost at least $7 billion solely as a direct result of our precise sanctions against Russia’s oil industry and refining sector – due to direct hits, downtime, and delays in shipments.
I am grateful to all our warriors of the Defense Forces of Ukraine who, together with the Security Service of Ukraine and our intelligence agencies, are delivering these results. We will scale up our long-range systems capabilities. Decisions are being prepared.
Glory to Ukraine!
Guillermo S retweeted
When America Folded, Ukraine started winning.
Here is a thing Donald Trump would prefer you not think about too hard. While he was busy explaining to anyone within earshot that he alone could end the war in 72 hours, Ukraine quietly went and built one of the most effective asymmetric military machines in modern history. Without Washington’s weapons. And, increasingly, without Washington full stop.
The Americans, you will recall, did eventually provide assistance. It arrived wrapped in so many restrictions it resembled a loan application from a particularly suspicious bank manager. Certain weapons could not be used against certain targets. Certain distances were off-limits. Certain conversations were not to be had. It was, in the generous assessment of military historians, a contribution. In the less generous assessment, it was a geopolitical participation trophy.
Then Washington stopped showing up altogether.
Ukrainian forces have quietly recaptured hundreds of square kilometers in the Zaporizhzhia sector, surpassing the territorial gains of the much-publicized 2023 counteroffensive  and deliberately said nothing about it, having learned that triumphant press conferences tend to end in embarrassment. Meanwhile, Ukraine regained the initiative in the world’s first full-scale drone war by launching a campaign of mid-range strikes designed to systematically dismantle the logistics of Putin’s invasion, targeting military warehouses, command posts, transport hubs, and air defense systems across the Russian rear.
The numbers are extraordinary. By January to March 2026, the pace of Ukrainian drone attacks had effectively doubled, with 100 to 200 unmanned aircraft crossing into Russian airspace every single night. Russia’s own Security Council Secretary Sergei Shoigu admitted in March that not a single region in Russia could consider itself safe, and that the Ural region, once completely unreachable, was now firmly in the zone of constant threat. 
Europe, for its part, did what Washington said it could never do without American leadership. EU military aid rose 67 percent in 2025, and the UK and Germany assumed co-leadership of weapons coordination after the US quietly stopped attending.  Last week, Brussels approved a 90-billion-euro loan package to fund Ukraine’s military and economic needs through 2027. 
And Russia? CSIS documents nearly 415,000 Russian battlefield casualties in 2025 alone, with Russian advance rates of between 15 and 70 meters per day, slower, the analysts note with some satisfaction, than virtually any major offensive campaign recorded in the past century.
Trump calls this a stalemate. Putin calls it progress. The Ukrainians call it Tuesday.
Gandalv / @Microinteracti1
Guillermo S retweeted
European Council meeting. For the first time in years there are no Russians in the room. Huge relief.
Guillermo S retweeted
You keep telling me I should try the new Grok for maths/physics calculations... This morning I did. I am happy to report that it did get considerably better indeed! Alas, it wasn't able to solve a test problem that ChatGPT Pro one-shotted (repeatedly & correctly). It made a good start but then just complained that it couldn't find the solution in the literature. So, I acknowledge it's great progress, but I'll stick with GPT for the time being.
For the record, I also tried Claude, but Claude just runs out of tokens pretty much immediately.
I also tried Gemini Pro again and it continues to fabulate plausible looking but simply wrong maths, it's really disappointing. I copied some of the Gemini output into GPT Pro and asked it to check the calculation, and it was... devastating.
I did not re-subscribe to the Google Ultra version again because I think that 275 EUR/month is totally overpriced. Though I can report after my previous disappointing experience with Google Ultra that the customer service you get with it is indeed amazing. I contacted their service to complain that the DeepThink mode proved to be bad at physics and I got my money back!
Unfortunately, truth be said, I dislike GPT the most by way of 'character', as it tends to blame me for its own mistakes and almost always complains that the problems I give it are unsolvable (and then actually solves them).
Guillermo S retweeted
Fun fact: the food industry spent 30 years making you confused about what healthy eating means.
Not because it’s complicated. Because confusion is profitable.
A professor in São Paulo solved it in 2009 with four groups. No calories. No ingredient lists. No macros. Just one question: how much has industry touched this?
Group 1: Nothing has touched it. Eggs, fruit, vegetables, meat, fish, nuts, water. Eat freely.
Group 2: Olive oil, butter, salt, flour, sugar.
Group 3: Group 1 preserved or modified. Canned beans, cheese, cured meat, fermented vegetables. Fine in moderation.
Group 4: Contains ingredients that exist solely for commercial reasons. Not to nourish you. To extend shelf life, cut production costs, and make you eat more than you intended.
The rule is simple. If your great-grandmother wouldn’t recognise it as food, it’s Group 4.
And even simpler: if it has an ingredient list, put it back.
Real food doesn’t need one.
The industry response to NOVA has been predictable.
They fund studies focused on individual nutrients. They add vitamins to Group 4 products and call them fortified. They lobby against labelling. They argue it’s “too simplistic.”
Simple is exactly the point.
In a controlled trial, people on an ultra-processed diet ate 500 calories more per day than people eating minimally processed food, even when both diets were matched for protein, fat, carbs and palatability.
They weren’t eating more because they were hungry. They were eating more because the food was designed to make them.
NOVA doesn’t tell you what to eat. It tells you what you’re actually eating.
Gandalv / @Microinteracti1
🤖 Made with AI
Guillermo S retweeted
Putin accidentally creating a high-tech regional military power of the first order on its doorstep has to be one of the funniest self-owns in history.
‼️ZELENSKYY: We will not sell our weapons like we did in the 1990s. Instead, we will share our knowledge and expertise in exchange for long-term, mutually beneficial security partnerships with Ukraine.
“We're building new partnerships on weapons differently than in the nineties or two thousands, when Ukrainian weapons and forces were sold off like it's Black Friday. We're not holding a fire sale of our weapons or emptying our warehouses. We're offering a security partnership that's long-term and profitable for Ukraine” - Zelenskyy’s address to the workers of Ukraine’s defense-industrial complex. April 13th, 2026.
Guillermo S retweeted
The future is already on the front line – and Ukraine is building it. These are our ground robotic systems. For the first time in the history of this war, an enemy position was taken exclusively by unmanned platforms – ground systems and drones. The occupiers surrendered, and the operation was carried out without infantry and without losses on our side.
Ratel, TerMIT, Ardal, Rys, Zmiy, Protector, Volia, and our other ground robotic systems have already carried out more than 22,000 missions on the front in just three months. In other words, lives were saved more than 22,000 times when a robot went into the most dangerous areas instead of a warrior. This is about high technology protecting the highest value – human life.
From the congratulatory address to the workers of Ukraine’s defense-industrial complex (2/3).
Guillermo S retweeted
"If America produces more oil than anyone, why is gas four dollars?"
Great question. Allow me to ruin the comforting idea that "the oil industry" is one big thing that could simply decide to give you cheaper gas if it wanted to.
What most people don't know is that "the oil industry" is in fact three completely different businesses between the ground and your gas tank:
1) The drilling company pulls crude oil out of the earth.
2) The refinery, which is a DIFFERENT company, buys that crude from the driller and cooks it into gasoline.
3) The gas station buys that gasoline from the refinery and sells it to you.
Three separate businesses, three markups. Each one passing the cost to the next guy in line.
When global oil prices spike, the driller charges more because crude always trades at *global* prices. The refinery then has to pay more for that crude. The gas station pays more for that gasoline. You pay more at the pump. That is the chain, and you are at the end of it.
Now, there's a silver lining to this. That chain is also pouring money into the American economy at a scale that is hard to overstate.
Eleven million jobs. Not just roughnecks. Truck drivers, welders, engineers, port workers, accountants, you name it. We're talking about Two trillion dollars in GDP, which is roughly 8% of the entire American economy. Five hundred and seventy billion in taxes in a single year. That goes to schools, hospitals, roads, fire departments and more.
And every barrel sold to Japan or Germany or South Korea is a barrel that USED to be sold by Saudi Arabia or Russia or Iran. That money used to leave America. Now it comes in.
Four dollars a gallon hurts. But the money is not vanishing into the atmosphere. It is cycling through American towns, American jobs, and American tax revenue.
And the countries buying American crude now depend on Washington, not Moscow and much less Tehran.
American oil is no longer just a product. It has become a bond between countries.
The pain is real, but will be temporary.
Guillermo S retweeted
The Most Expensive Mistake Since Someone Invaded Russia in Winter
For years, Trump told Europe it was freeloading. Not paying its share. Weak, comfortable, ungrateful. He said it so often it became received wisdom, carved into the MAGA catechism as though Moses himself had brought it down from the mountain.
The numbers do not cooperate.
European NATO members spent $454 billion on defence in 2024. Russia, the actual threat, spent $149 billion. Europe outspends the aggressor three to one. But that $454 billion is the floor, not the ceiling. Trump uses the narrowest possible accounting definition and presents it as the complete picture.
European support to Ukraine’s armed forces alone exceeds €63 billion. None of that appears in the number he waves around at rallies.
Meanwhile, America pays roughly 16 percent of NATO’s common budget. Germany pays a similar share. The rest of the American defence budget funds 750 bases across 80 countries and the considerable overhead of running a global empire nobody formally asked Washington to build.
At The Hague in 2025, Trump got his great concession. Europeans committed to 5 percent of GDP on defence by 2035. He called it a historic achievement. He was right, in the same way that a man who kicks over a hornets nest is right to call it a significant event.
Because 80 percent of European defence spending already flows to domestic suppliers. The EU now formally targets 60 percent of all procurement from European manufacturers by 2035. Germany directs 92 percent of new defence purchases to European suppliers. American systems receive 8 percent. Berlin was once one of Washington’s most reliable arms customers. It has quietly stopped being one, and European capitals are not embarrassed about why. European weapons arrive without usage restrictions, without congressional conditions, without the risk that a change in Washington renders your equipment politically unusable. Ukraine taught Europe that lesson at considerable cost.
The American defence research machine runs partly on allied procurement. When Europeans buy American hardware, they co-fund the next generation of American military technology. When they stop, that bill lands on the American taxpayer.
Trump demanded Europe pay more. Europe is paying more, to itself, building the industrial base that makes American partnership optional rather than necessary.
He wanted customers. He created competitors.
The arithmetic was never complicated. It just required someone to actually do it.
Stay connected,
Follow Gandalv @Microinteracti1

















