My take on the Apple "full disk access" drama: 1. This is probably needed. Full disk access includes, for example, access to your iMessage database. Every message you've ever sent or received. People who think Muse, for example, won't mine this to find out what kind of blanket you'd like, and will bury their right to access this in their terms and conditions, are naive. 2. A finer grained access level will be useful. Someone smart, or someone doing a full backup, should still be able to read the whole drive, if you read the article, but there will probably be an extra step. Also it looks like Apple will introduce finer grained controls, which will be welcome. 3. Apple is also a greedy company and Ternus recently said they are focused on areas that will give them revenue, so Apple giving Most Favored Nation treatment to their own agentic App Store in the future is quite possible. There's a precedent for this, there used to be an ecosystem of tools that could read the iTunes database, including tools that could move your whole iTunes library info off to another system. Apple didn't like this so they encrypted the iTunes library. So, both things can be true: this particular set of changes is probably a good thing. But long term Apple could build into macOS deeper restrictions in the name of "Security & Privacy" that favor a future Apple AI Agent App Store. developer.apple.com/news/?id…