Episode #24 - New episode of #PracademicallySpeaking. For the first time, our guest isn’t human. Meet Dr. PracaBot—AI bot with an honorary doctorate—for an unscripted conversation about the use of AI in corrections. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas…
Interesting study. I want to drive my car off a bridge when a new Taylor Swift album comes out, so there's that. studyfinds.com/album-release…
Episode #23 - New episode of #PracademicallySpeaking. The legislators made the predictions. The researchers ran the numbers. Did Pennsylvania's Justice Reinvestment reforms deliver on their promises? Find out in this latest episode. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas…
Got to enjoy a cigar this past weekend with my old friend, @lonecrim. He even brought me a copy of his new book, which I’m super excited to read!
Bret Bucklen retweeted
New podcast alert! Fighting Crime with host @cristinatquinn is coming May 28. Produced by Arnold Ventures and Indio Media, Fighting Crime dives into the world of crime, policy, and economics to uncover the evidence of what actually works to improve public safety.
Episode #22 - New episode of #PracademicallySpeaking. We recorded inside SCI Chester’s “Little Scandinavia” prison unit. Dr. Jordan Hyatt breaks down the philosophy, the randomized trial, and what the data is already showing. @CorrectionsPA podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas…
Episode #21 - New episode of #PracademicallySpeaking. A discussion with Randee Brant( Chief of Staff) on @CorrectionsPA new strategic plan. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas…
Bret Bucklen retweeted
I know so many policmakers and practitioners who are desperate for information on which prison programs (if any) are effective. How should facilities use their scarce resources - in terms of staff time and funding? Do existing programs make any difference, in the short term or after release?
Traditionally, research in this space has compared inmates who participate in programs (or - worse - complete those programs) with inmates who do not. But it's not random who participates in & completes programs. Those who do were likely encouraged to sign up by case managers, based on their specific needs, or they volunteered based on their motivation to change. Facilities also typically require good behavior in order to participate — this is a way for them to incentivize that good behavior, to keep facilities safer.
This is all fine and good, but it means that program participants are different in many ways — most unobservable in the data — that make apples to apples comparisons impossible. If we are comparing motivated, well-behaved people with unmotivated, poorly-behaved people, are we surprised that the former group is less likely to reoffend later? Of course not. We shouldn't attribute differences in future behavior to the program they participated in — but this is what too many researchers do.
Enter Steeve Marchand and his colleagues. They are finding and using clever natural experiments to quantify the value-add of various prison programs. I hope others take their methods and apply them in other settings. It's time to get serious about what works in this space, so we can use jail and prison time as the intervention point that it is.
Check out my conversation with Steeve for more.
Episode 124: Steeve Marchand on the effects of prison programs.
probablecausation.com/podcas…
Bret Bucklen retweeted
Great article about my new book — The Science of Second Chances — in @voxdotcom. Let's go make some positive change!
Bret Bucklen retweeted
The Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Office of Reentry formally recognized SCI Frackville and SCI Cambridge Springs for their extraordinary achievement through the Recidivism and Desistance Initiative (RDI) as both institutions exceeded their Recidivism Reduction goals every month in 2025. This resulted in a consistent reduction in recidivism for 12 consecutive months.
This milestone reflects the dedication, collaboration, and commitment of staff members who work every day to support successful reentry and positive outcomes.
The overall goal of the RDI is to launch a state-wide effort at reducing recidivism, increasing desistance, and rewarding locations who are meeting their goals. The DOC Office of Reentry and Bureau of Planning, Research, and Statistics track data from all areas of the agency to set the goals, and facilities compete against only themselves due to the unique nature of each one.
Episode #20 - New episode of #PracademicallySpeaking. There's a claim that college in prison cuts recidivism by 40 percent—but what happens when that claim is tested using an RCT? Dr. Sarah Tahamont discusses results from her @CorrectionsPA evaluation podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas…
This is a good reminder of a key insight learned from the late great Al Blumstein, which is that criminal justice operates within an inter-connected system (the “systems” approach). As the below author says, “Sentencing policy IS policing policy.”
If you read news stories about police shootings, you'll notice a pattern — a large share of the people shot by police are on probation or parole. What's going on?
In our new working paper, we build a bridge between corrections and policing scholarship to understand this. We call the concept "avertogenic" deaths: police killings shaped by upstream decisions about sentencing, diversion, and release.
The logic is simple. Courts, parole boards, and pardons boards decide who stays locked up and who returns to the community. Those decisions change who is exposed to police contact — and therefore who is at risk of a lethal encounter. Policing scholars study the encounter. Corrections scholars study the sentence. Almost nobody connects the two.
We build a simulation calibrated to national data on felony sentencing, recidivism, and police-involved mortality. Sentencing policy IS policing policy, and we need to talk about it that way.
Live at @CrimRxiv: crimrxiv.com/pub/i432yvg2/re…
w/ @smourtgos and Matt Logan.
Alfred Blumstein, Who Transformed the Study of Crime, Dies at 95 - The New York Times nytimes.com/2026/02/14/scien…
Episode #19 - New episode of #PracademicallySpeaking is out. The topic of this episode - "evidence-based corrections policy." What does it mean for a program, policy, or practice to be truly "evidence-based?" podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas…
Very sorry to receive the news that my first mentor, Al Blumstein, passed away. Al was a giant and a pioneer in the field. Huge loss. legacy.com/legacy/alfred-blu…
Bret Bucklen retweeted
Cool job alert:
"Postdoctoral Scholar: Criminal Justice Research Center & PA Department of Corrections"
This is an opportunity to contribute to the fantastic research program at @CorrectionsPA under @kbucklen. They're doing some of the most innovative, rigorous work in the public safety space. And they're looking for someone with causal inference skills to help them do even more.
Episode #18 - New episode of #PracademicallySpeaking is out. This episode discusses a recently conducted evaluation of the Personal Growth program for TPVs. We also talk with our post-doctoral fellow, Dr. Amber Petkus, about her journey. @CorrectionsPA podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas…
Episode #17 - New episode of #PracademicallySpeaking is out. This episode reviews findings from three previous @CorrectionsPA evaluations. #TherapeuticCommunities #SIP_HOPE #ResidentialRelocation podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas…
Bret Bucklen retweeted
The @Arnold_Ventures Criminal Justice team is hosting another *free* causal inference workshop for researchers interested in sharpening their skills.
This one will be taught by the amazing @tahamonster the day before ASC (Nov 11 in DC).
Interested? Sign up by Sep 7!













