Kent retweeted
Team USA just sang the best National Anthem you will ever hear at @11Miami
Kent retweeted
FLASHBACK: Kash Patel is asked why the FBI is protecting Jeffrey Epstein, “the world's foremost predator,” and says, “Simple: Because of who’s on that list.”
“It’s like what the hell are these Republicans doing!?... Put on your big boy pants and let us know who the pedophiles are!”
In another interview the same year, he told Glenn Beck that Epstein’s “black book” is “under direct control of the director of the FBI.”
This was 2023, before he himself became FBI director:
Kent retweeted
🧵3) until tonight no one knew who sent the torture video to Epstein. I went to DOJ, unredacted the email, and reverse searched the email to discover it was a Sultans. Our law requires VICTIM’s information to be redacted, not information of men who sent Epstein torture porn!
You looked at the document. You know it’s an email address that was redacted. The law requires redactions for personally identifiable information, including if in an email address. And you know that the Sultan’s name is available unredacted in the files. See EFTA00666117.
Be honest, and stop grandstanding.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The claimed justification is inapplicable. Per the act, redacting language, on the basis it's personally identifiable information, is allowed only for victim info. PL 119-38, sec. 2(c)(1). congress.gov/119/plaws/publ….
Moreover, the act doesn't require redactions--it uses "may". sec 2(c)(1).