Kaddicus retweeted
Replying to @GamingAndPandas
ALL COLOR MUST BE SUBMITTED TO GLORPNACK THE COLOR EATER
NO MOODY LIGHTING OR VIBRANT LANDSCAPES ALLOWED
Kaddicus retweeted
geniusze z ubisoftu zapomniały dodać plików do gry którą wydały na steamie, żadna inna firma nie jest zdolna do czegoś takiego xDDDD
Kaddicus retweeted
I walk past my husband’s office. He is staring at his dual monitors, both with different maps pulled up. He is pensive. Suddenly he rapidly types something; one map zooms in on a blurry patch of brown. “Exactly what I thought,” he murmurs.
He opens a new tab, and types, “maps.”
Kaddicus retweeted
This would be considered comically crude and vulgar to the point of completely breaking immersion in any world building context. Like, really, a place called *Sus Sex* that is divided into special territorial divisions called *Rapes* used no where else in the world?
Kaddicus retweeted
There’s a joke about an Irishman in the Alps who gets buried up to his neck in an avalanche along with his Swiss guide. They think they’re doomed but suddenly hear a bark as a St Bernard comes bounding towards them with a little barrel of brandy on its collar
“Ah here comes zee man’s best friend” says the Swiss guide
“Aye, and look at the size of that dog” says the Irishman
The number of people I see totally misunderstanding this post is very concerning.
He's not advocating for fornicating with roadkill.
He's not advocating for giving up morality.
He's not even SAYING atheists DO do these things.
It's very simple: If you are not religious, why is it "wrong" to do this? He is asking you to, through the use of logic, explain where you get your "right" and "wrong" from.
And it's very easy to answer it!
"I don't believe in a universal morality, so it is not 'wrong' in that sense, but it is disgusting and abhorrent because of the exposure to disease. It also makes the person participating disgusting because they are not only made a potential carrier of that disease, but because it makes them the type of person that has no disgust response, so their character is of someone dangerous to themselves and others."
If you are incapable of introspecting and articulating your beliefs, you do not have beliefs. You are not an atheist; you are simply not religious. You are running on instinct, and it reflects in your posts when you get mad for being asked to explain something.
The best logical fallacy to give an atheist when discussing morals is to ask them why it's morally wrong to have intercourse with roadkill
It's dead it will not feel anything, nobody will know and there are no victims
If you ask a Christian or Buddhist why it's morally wrong, they will tell you it's because the body retains inherent dignity as part of God's creation (or the sacred flow of life), and desecrating it violates divine/natural order, harms your soul/karma, and shows disrespect, even if no one feels it or knows
An atheistic worldview of this question taken to its extreme, concludes that intercourse with roadkill is tantamount to masturbation and nothing more
Kaddicus retweeted
"I am going to compare a shitty Disney adaptation of a video game to the adaptation of one of the keystones of western literature done by one of the most prolific directors of the day to somehow conflate the two adaptations, of course ignoring the fact that nobody liked the white guy in the Prince of Persia movie, thus making any comparison meaningless. I remain a smart person."
-Still not a smart person, 2026
Kaddicus retweeted
Hi, I'm their lawyer. It will be a cold day in Hell before my client pays that fine. Ofcom won't be collecting it unless they're prepared to land ground troops in America, overthrow our government, and rescind our constitutional order by force.
Hope that helps!
Looking to speak to a legal expert on the Online Safety Act urgently (ideally this morning) on the looming 4Chan/Ofcom fine deadline and what happens next. Please email [email protected] if you can help. Thank you!
Kaddicus retweeted
Hi Sandy, I hope you’re well. I have appreciated the recent discussions. I do not agree with your framing.
Regarding piracy, DOOM is a complicated example because shareware was the model. DOOM’s first episode was designed to be freely copied, passed around, uploaded, installed, and played. That enormous unpaid audience was not the same thing as piracy. It was part of how DOOM reached the world.
By the mid-90s, DOOM had something like 20 million shareware installs and more than 2 million paid copies sold. Those 20 million people were not “pirates” by default. A huge number of them were playing the free episode exactly as intended.
That doesn’t excuse people pirating the registered game. However, it’s important not to collapse legal shareware distribution, unpaid reach, and actual piracy into one number.
I also don’t think piracy is what “gutted” id - id is still around and still making games. Piracy may have cost money, but it wasn’t the reason Quake was hard or why people eventually went different ways.
So yes: pay developers. Buy the games you love. Support the people who make them.
But history is messier than “pirates killed the companies.” Sometimes the same free distribution that looked like lost sales was also the thing that made the game impossible to ignore.