In my opinion, there is no such thing as legal or illegal manslaughter. If someone wants to exercise their right to take a life, just let them do that. You can’t subjugate people to statutes and force them to spend their entire lives under these statutes.
In my opinion, there are no such things as legal or illegal immigrants. If someone wants to live in a certain city, just let them live there. You can’t divide people into nations and force them to spend their entire lives in a country they never chose to be born in. I think true far-leftists should demand an end to visa requirements for travel.
Anyways, if you remove this argument of the eugenics label, you can only come to the conclusion that all hospitals and doctors are unethical because they force sick people to disappear/adapt to society rather than merely accepting that they're sick and getting on with it.
>You have no right to judge whether a child has the right to be born or not, none.
I wonder in which particular area of contemporary political discourse I’ve heard that rhetoric before…
Also—people love to throw around ‘eugenics’ as a label without explaining why it’s wrong.
Ça s'appelle de l'eugénisme.
Les personnes trisomiques n'ont pas à disparaître de la société ou à s'adapter.
C'est la société toute entière qui doit s'adapter aux personnes handicapés
Vous n'avez aucun droit à juger de si un enfant à le droit de naître ou pas, aucun.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Eugenics is the practice of reducing certain human phenotypes deemed inferior by controlling the population with those traits by forced sterilaztion and murder. That study does nothing of that and it won't kill the person.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics
juba retweeted
american logic is that every citizen from every country in the world can be blamed for what their nation did 400 years ago, but this rule doesnt apply to them and they are not responsible of their country's actions now.
"but i didnt vote trump!!" ok? and i wasnt around in 1492 ?
juba retweeted
I must admit it’s been somewhat perturbing to discover the English seem to be the only people in the world without an ethnicity. That’s a fascinating development. Someone should research how every other ethnicity came into existence but the English didn’t.
juba retweeted
"i'm reaching a point where i'm genuinely starting to dgaf about anything that doesn't involve girls kissing"
unavailable
Do people not know that you can be secular and religious? It would be different if he said Britain were explicitly irreligious or atheist, that it is not, but it is certainly secular. The Church of England is very limited in its role in politics.
juba retweeted
"He said Indian immigrants fought for the Union during the Civil War and it's the son of a Welsh missionary born in Bombay under British rule."
Immigrants from India fought for the Union in the Civil War.
The Militia Act of 1862, promised an expedited path to American citizenship for foreigners who provided honorable military service.
Charles J. Simons: Born in Bombay (Mumbai), India, Simons is the most decorated South Asian soldier from the conflict. He was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor for his extraordinary bravery during the bloody Battle of the Crater in 1864.
Supposedly prosperous regional power fighting a war with the support of the United States, Turkey, Pakistan, and Israel cannot prevent impoverished tribesmen from destroying their export regime. Saudi Arabia might just be the most raped country in the world, it's not even funny.
juba retweeted
Have you ever noticed how trans people always seem to need some kind of overstimulating visual flair to everything, akin to those sensory videos for babies?
At the most basic level, production is oriented toward subsistence. Any output exceeding subsistence creates a surplus. A producer would exchange his surplus in a market so that he may generate income and acquire other goods and services that he does not produce himself.
