Jon Strocel (@jstrocel) header
Jon Strocel (@jstrocel) profile picture

COO of @parlayonemedia / Father of 2 / 30+ year broadcast professional / Maker of business systems / Gatherer of random facts

Coquitlam, BC, Canada
Joined March 2007
Photo by Jon Strocel (@jstrocel)Photo by Jon Strocel (@jstrocel)Photo by Jon Strocel (@jstrocel)Photo by Jon Strocel (@jstrocel)Photo by Jon Strocel (@jstrocel)Photo by Jon Strocel (@jstrocel)Photo by Jon Strocel (@jstrocel)Photo by Jon Strocel (@jstrocel)Photo by Jon Strocel (@jstrocel)Photo by Jon Strocel (@jstrocel)
Jon Strocel retweeted
Trump: I’m basically a truthful person Podcaster: *bursts out laughing at him*
2,301
14,782
1,826
107,227
6,425,919
Here's the lineup for BC Cup day at Hastings Park. There are 8 races on the card including these 6 stakes. Watch on @FanDuelTV and wager here racing.fanduel.com/racetrack…
4
8
2,315
It's BC Cup day at Hastings Park! @DawnLupul the Manager of Racing & Communications at Hastings Park gives us a preview and sets the stage. Watch on @FanDuelTV and wager here racing.fanduel.com/racetrack…
3
8
1
17
4,681
ROGERS ARENA IS ROCKING! WHERE THE STREETS HAVE NO NAME RETURNS!
38
331
88
2,024
106,441
Looks like Global News managed to sneak some layoffs under the radar amid all the fury of Bell's disgusting cuts. Meanwhile, the CEO of Corus Entertainment (which owns Global) made $4.4 million in 2021. Sorry Jessica. You deserve way better -- we all do.
Saddened to say I've been laid off by Global News Regina in the latest cuts I've worked alongside some amazing colleagues, and had the opportunity to cover some once in a lifetime moments in Saskatchewan Legislature Stay tuned for my next career update
171
6
469
34,814
Greedy executives are sucking journalism dry while they chew up and spit out the people who actually do the work. It’s a dangerous trend that will let the powerful go unquestioned as our democracy dwindles. So let’s talk about what the dudes making these decisions are paid.
1
263
42
766
37,388
Shohei might be collecting 700 million over the next 10 seasons but Bobby Bonilla will still be getting paid three more seasons after it’s done.
169
1,035
136
11,200
1,378,341
It’s time for newsroom executives to actually start earning their ridiculous, bloated pay. Because these layoffs are an indictment of their ability to do their fucking jobs. My thoughts;
148
71
566
52,592
Amazon is paying $100 million to broadcast the NFL's first-ever Black Friday game. But it's really a chess move to steal market share from brick-and-mortar stores and generate online sales. Let me explain 👇 Thanksgiving Day football has always been huge. Last year's games averaged 33.5 million viewers, including 42 million viewers for the Cowboys vs. Giants — the most-watched regular season game of all time. 2022 Average Viewership • NBA Christmas Day: 4.27 million • NFL Thanksgiving Day: 33.5 million But the NFL has never done a Black Friday game because 1) it's a holiday known for people leaving the house to go shopping and 2) the Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961 prohibits NFL games on Fridays after 6 pm ET and all day on Saturdays during the fall. This rule was implemented by Congress to protect high school and college football from seeing a decline in attendance and viewership because of the NFL. But Amazon offered the NFL $100 million for the game, so they decided to put it at 3 pm ET to skirt the rule. And it's an even better deal for Amazon. Amazon is allowing anyone to watch — Amazon's first TNF broadcast generated more Prime sign-ups than any other 3-hour window in company history — and Amazon is also reportedly charging 2x more than their TNF broadcast for 30-second ad placements. Cost Of A 30-Second Commercial • Thursday Night Football: $440,000 • Black Friday: $880,000 But more importantly, Amazon will leverage its new ad strategy called "audience-based creative." This will enable brands to target different audience segments with different ads in the same time slot. For example, according to Ad Age, Bose will show three different ads using Amazon's ad technology. The first ad features Joe Burrow and will be delivered to non-Prime members, while the other two Bose ads will feature different products and be shown only to Prime members based on their Amazon Prime search history. And here's the best part... These targeted ads will also be shoppable, meaning viewers can watch the commercial, place the product in their cart with the click of a button, and checkout without ever leaving the broadcast. That makes Amazon's broadcast far more valuable than a typical commercial — brands will be able to retarget these customers after the game — and it also gives us a view into how brand advertising could look in the future. Companies like Amazon and Apple are only going to spend more money on live sports rights, and their ad targeting could change how brands market forever. Now that's pretty damn cool. ** If you enjoyed this breakdown, follow me @JoePompliano for more sports business content **
381
1,629
748
12,345
7,568,768
Take 4 minutes to WATCH this. It'll be the BEST story you see today. @ParlayOneMedia is proud to showcase the great work @VanPoliceFnd is doing for the community, along side members of @VancouverPD #JesseAndJade 👮🏻‍♂️🐕‍🦺 youtube.com/watch?v=tPK__oGO…
4
7
1,492
Great to chat with Daniel at @canucksalumni #22
2
6
635
#Diwali celebrates victory of light over darkness and the triumph of good over evil. It’s a time to share joy, love, and positivity with family and friends. Happy Diwali 🪔 🙏🏽
2
1
15
1,176
Wow. Pete Buttigieg just responded to Mike Johnson saying his same-sex marriage is the “dark harbinger of chaos and sexual anarchy” that will destroy the country.
684
3,728
806
20,983
6,749,026
Jon Strocel retweeted
This decision has stripped clubs of a powerful community outreach tool and removed meaningful support for Special Initiatives, all to protect a select few who do not want to answer any questions about their choices. I hope the NHL reconsiders in order to remain a leader in DEI.
1,081
3,493
498
18,362
2,039,912
Jon Strocel retweeted
People ask me all the time if I am "pro-Israel" because I am a Jew who has lived in Israel, and my answer is that being "pro-Israel" or being "pro-Palestine" or being a "Zionist" does not properly capture the nuance of thought most people do or should have about this issue. It certainly doesn't capture mine. I have a lot to say. I’ve spent the last 72 hours writing, texting, and talking to Israelis, Jews, Muslims, and Palestinians. Much of my reaction is going to piss off people on "both sides," but I am exhausted and hurting and I do not think there is any way to discuss this situation without being radically honest about my views. So I'm going to try to say what I believe to be true the best I can. Let me start with this: It could have been me. That's a hard thought to shake when watching the videos out of Israel — the concert goers fleeing across an empty expanse, the hostages being paraded through the streets, the people shot in the head at bus stops or in their cars. I went to those parties in the desert, I rubbed shoulders with Israelis and Arabs and Jews and Muslims, I could have easily accepted an invitation to some concert near Sderot and gone without a care, only to be indiscriminately slaughtered. Or, perhaps worse, taken hostage and tortured. I don’t believe Hamas is killing Israelis to liberate themselves, nor do I believe they are doing it to make peace. They're doing this because they represent the devil on the shoulder of every oppressed Palestinian who has lost someone in this conflict. They're doing it because they want vengeance. They are evening the score, and acting on the worst of our human impulses, to respond to blood with blood — an inclination that is easy to give in to after what their people have endured. It should not be hard to understand their logic — it is only hard to accept that humans are capable of being driven to this. Not defending Hamas is a very low bar to clear. Please clear it. It’s not possible to recap the entire 5,000 year history of people fighting over this strip of land in one newsletter. There are plenty of easily accessible places you can learn about it if you want to (and, by the way, many of you should — far too many people speak on this issue with an obscene amount of ignorance, loads of arrogance, and a narrow historical lens focused on the last few decades). But I'll briefly highlight a few things that are important to me. In my opinion, the Jewish people have a legitimate historical claim to the land of Israel. Jews had already been expelled and returned and expelled again a half dozen times before the rise of the Muslim and Arab rule of the Ottoman Empire. Of course it’s messy because we Jews and Arabs and Muslims are all cousins and descendents of the same Canaanites. But Arabs won the land centuries ago the same way Israel and Jews won it in the 20th century: Through conflict and war. The British defeated the Ottoman Empire and then came the Balfour Declaration, which amounted to the British granting the area to the Jewish people, a promise they’d later try to renege on — all before the wars that have defined the region since 1948. That historical moment in the late 1940s was unique. After World War II, with many Arab and Muslim states already in existence, and after six million Jews were slaughtered, the global community felt it was important to grant the Jewish people a homeland. In a more logical or just world that homeland would have been in Europe as a kind of reparation for what the Nazis and others before them had done to the Jews, or perhaps in the Americas — like Alaska — or somewhere else. But the Jews wanted Israel, the British had taken to the Zionist movement, the British had conquered the Ottoman Empire which handed them control of the land, and America and Europe didn’t want the Jews. As a result, we got Israel. The Arab states had already rejected a partitioned Israel repeatedly before World War II and rejected it again after the Holocaust and the end of the war. They did not want to give up even a little bit of their land to a bunch of Jewish interlopers who were granted it all of a sudden by British interlopers who had arrived a hundred years prior. Who could blame them? It had been centuries since Jews lived there in large numbers, and now they wanted to return in waves as secularized Europeans. Many of us would probably react the same way. So, just as humans have done forever, they fought. The many existing Arab states turned against the burgeoning new Jewish state. One side won and one side lost. This is the brutal and broken and violent world we live in, but it is what created the global world order we have now. Are Israelis and British people "colonizers" because of this 20th century history? Sure. But that view flattens thousands of years of history and conflict, and the context of World War I and World War II. I don’t view Israelis and Brits as colonizers any more than the Assyrians or the Babylonians or the Romans or the Mongols or the Egyptians or the Ottomans who all battled over the same strip of land from as early as 800 years before Jesus’s time until now. The Jews who founded Israel just happened to have won the last big battle for it. You can’t speak about this issue in a vacuum. You can't pretend that it wasn't just 60 years ago when Israel was surrounded on all sides by Arab states who wanted to wipe them off the face of the planet. Despite the balance of power shifting this century, that threat is still a reality. And you can't talk about that without remembering the only reason the Jews were in Israel in the first place was that they'd spent the previous centuries fleeing a bunch of Europeans who also wanted to wipe them off the face of the planet. And then Hitler showed up. American partisans have a narrow view of this history, and an Americentric lens that is infuriating to witness. As Lee Fang perfectly put it, "Hamas would absolutely execute the ACAB lefties cheering on horrific violence against Israelis if they lived in Gaza & U.S. right-wingers blindly cheering on Israeli subjugation of Palestinians would rebel twice as violently if Americans were subjected to similar occupation." And yet, many Americans only view modern Israel as the "powerful" one in this dynamic. Which is true — they obviously are. It isn't a fair fight and it hasn't been for decades because Israel's government is rich and resourceful, has the backing of the United States and most of Europe, and has an incredibly powerful military. At the same time, Israeli leadership has made technological and military advancements that have further tipped those scales — all while the Israeli government has helped create a resource-thin open air prison of two million Arabs in Gaza. Conversely, Palestinians are devoid of any real unified leadership, and the Arab world is now divided on the issue of Palestine. Israel is unwilling to give the people in Gaza and the West Bank more than an inch of freedom to live. These are largely the refugees and descendents of the refugees of the 1948 and 1967 wars that Israel won. And you can't keep two million people in the condition that those in the Gaza strip live in and not expect events like this. I'm sorry to say that while the blood on the ground is fresh. The Israelis who were killed in this attack largely have nothing to do with those conditions other than being born at a time when Israel and Jews have the upper hand in this conflict. Some of the victims weren’t even Israeli — they were just tourists. This is why we describe them as “innocent” and why Hamas has only reaffirmed that they are a brutal terror organization with this attack — an organization that I hope is quickly toppled, for the sake of both the Palestinian people and the Israelis. But as someone with a deep love for Israel, with friends in danger and people I know still missing, it breaks my heart to say it but I'm saying it again because it remains perhaps the most salient point of context in a tangled mess full of centuries of context: You cannot keep two million people living in the conditions people in Gaza are living in and expect peace. You can't. And you shouldn’t. Their environment is antithetical to the human condition. Violent rebellion is guaranteed. Guaranteed. As sure as the sun rising. And the cycle of violence seems locked in to self-perpetuate, because both sides see a score to settle: 1) Israel has already responded with a vengeance, and they will continue to. Their desire for violence is not unlike Hamas’s — it’s just as much about blood for blood as any legitimate security measure. Israel will “have every right to respond with force." Toppling Hamas — a group, by the way, Israel erred in supporting — will now be the objective, and civilian death will be seen as necessary collateral damage. But Israel will also do a bunch of things they don't have a right to. They will flatten apartment buildings and kill civilians and children and many in the global community will probably cheer them on while they do it. They have already stopped the flow of water, electricity, and food to two million people, and killed dozens of civilians in their retaliatory bombings. We should never accept this, never lose sight that this horror is being inflicted on human beings. As the group B’Tselem said, “There is no justification for such crimes, whether they are committed as part of a struggle for freedom from oppression or cited as part of a war against terror.” I mourn for the innocents of Palestine just as I do for the innocents in Israel. As of late, many, many more have died on their side than Israel's. And many more Palestinians are likely to die in this spate of violence, too. Unfortunately, most people in the West only pay attention to this story when Hamas or a Palestinian in Gaza or the West Bank commits an act of violence. Palestinian citizens die regularly at the hands of the Israeli military and their plight goes largely unnoticed until they respond with violence of their own. Israel had already killed an estimated 250 Palestinians, including 47 children, this year alone. And that is just in the West Bank. 2) Every single time Israel kills someone in the name of self-defense they create a handful of new radicalized extremists who will feel justified in wanting to take an Israeli life in retribution sometime in the future. Half of Gaza’s two million people are under the age of 19 — they know little besides Hamas rule (since 2006), Israeli occupation, blockades, and rockets falling from the sky. The suffering of these innocent children born into this reality is incomprehensible to me. They will suffer more now because of Hamas’s actions and Israel’s response, all through no fault of their own. There is no way out of this pattern until one side exercises restraint or leaders on both sides find a new solution. Israelis will tell you that if Palestinians put their guns down then the war would end, but if Israel put their guns down they'd be wiped off the planet. I don't have a crystal ball and can’t tell you what is true. But what I am certain of is that every time Israel kills more innocents they engender more rage and hatred and recruit more Palestinians and Arabs to the cause against them. There is no disputing this. So, why did this happen now? I'm not sure how to answer that question except to say it was bound to happen eventually. It was a massive policy and intelligence failure and Netanyahu should pay the price politically — he is a failed leader. Iran probably helped organize the attack and the money freed up by the Biden administration's prisoner swap probably didn't help the situation, either. Israel's increasingly extremist government and settlers provoking Palestinians certainly didn't help. Nor has going to the Al-Aqsa mosque and desecrating it. Nor do blockades and bombings and indiscriminate subjugation of a whole people. Nor does refusing to talk to non-terrorist leaders in Palestine. Nor does illegally continuing to expand and steal what is left of Palestinian land, as many Jews and Israelis have been doing in the 21st century despite cries from the global community to stop. A violent response was predictable — in fact, plenty of people did predict it. Israel is forever stuffing these people into tinier and tinier boxes with fewer and fewer resources. But if you want to blame Israeli leaders for continuing to expand and settle land that does not belong to them (as I do), then you should also spare some blame for Palestinian leaders for repeatedly not accepting a partitioned Israel during the 20th century that could have led to peace (as I do). Please also remember this: Hamas is still an extremist group. The Palestinian people do not have a government or leaders who legitimately represent their interests, and it sure as hell isn't Hamas. Will some Palestinians cheer and clap at the dead, or spit on them as they are paraded through Gaza? Yes they will. And they have. Many will also mourn because they loathe Hamas and know this will only make things worse. This is no different than how some Americans cheer at the dead in every single war we've ever fought. It's no different than the Israelis who set up lawn chairs to watch their government bomb Palestine and cheer them on, too. This doesn't mean Palestinians or Israelis or Americans are evil — it means some of them are giving in to their violent impulses, and their zealous feelings of righteous vengeance. Solutions, you ask? I can’t say I have any. If you came here for that, I’m sorry. The two-state solution looks dead to me. A three-state solution makes some sense but feels out of the view of all the people who matter and could make it happen. I wish a one-state solution felt realistic — a world of Israelis and Arabs and Muslims and Jews living side by side with equal rights, fully integrated and defused of their hate, is a version of Israel that I would adore. But it seems less and less realistic with every new act of violence. Am I pro-Israel or pro-Palestine? I have no idea. I'm pro-not-killing-civilians. I'm pro-not-trapping-millions-of-people-in-open-air-prisons. I'm pro-not-shooting-grandmas-in-the-back-of-the-head. I'm pro-not-flattening-apartment-complexes. I'm pro-not-raping-women-and-taking-hostages. I'm pro-not-unjustly-imprisoning-people-without-due-process. I'm pro-freedom and pro-peace and pro- all the things we never see in this conflict anymore. Whatever this is, I want none of it.
3,524
19,207
6,886
74,789
20,461,362
When hate groups speak to Lockdowns, especially in My Community in BC, I might want to remind people that this was my two years of "Lockdown" #BCneverhadalockdown @courtghoward @MaryFernando_ @dockevinmcleod @jodyvance I joyfully danced in the empty corridors of the hospital.
2
4
1
17
3,514
Simple graphs to counter COVID denialism & revisionism 1) American Deaths '99-'23 (raw) Sometimes simple graphs tell a powerful story. When we talk about the United States having > 1 million excess deaths due to the pandemic, this is the visualization of what that looks like.
76
832
43
2,480
271,939
Orion Kerkering's dad crying for an entire inning in his son's MLB debut was one of the coolest moments of the season. I don't care what team you root for.
216
2,560
473
36,045
5,906,979
Jon Strocel retweeted
The Vancouver broadcast community is suffering a major and sudden loss. @KuljeetKaila lost her battle with cancer this morning. She was a radio and TV staple in this market, and one of the kindest souls i’ve known. My condolences to her family, and all who knew her. #RIPKuljeet
35
62
15
734
60,571
Jon Strocel retweeted
Thursday, a newly renovated @SportsCenter studio will be revealed during the 2p ET edition SportsCenter anchor @MattBarrie gives a preview of some impressive features The latest example of ever-changing & evolving innovation as ESPN marks its 44th anniversary today
8
55
33
230
108,334