Husband, Dad, Software Engineer, Nerd (but I repeat myself) Also at @jpwkeeper.bsky.social

Maryland
Joined June 2015
John Woodard retweeted
President Obama did not walk out of our 2012 satellite interview. He was visibly frustrated when I repeated my Benghazi question after he ducked it. And his team did try to tell us our time was up. But I kept asking questions and he didn't walk out.
Replying to @ThomBrady5
Barack Obama has ended interviews, most notably walking off a 2012 live satellite interview with Denver reporter Kyle Clark. Frustrated by repeated questions about whether the military could have helped during the Benghazi attack, Obama dismissed the line of questioning as a political "gotcha" game and disengaged from the conversation. While he has frequently cut off reporters during press scrums for interrupting him or asking questions out of turn, the 2012 Clark incident remains the primary instance of him abruptly terminating a scheduled interview due to friction over the subject matter. Or, if the "reporters" weren't of the here's a softball type he just didn't permit the interviews.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
President Obama did not walk out of this 2012 interview. After Kyle Clark asked about the Benghazi attack, Obama provided a detailed response regarding his directives during the incident and then remained to answer further questions about stimulus money and Abound Solar. presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/inte…
131
1,960
50
23,285
1,288,900
"I don't want the president of the United States to have a cognitive deficiency." Too late.
Trump: Newsom had admitted he has mental problems, that he's not a smart person, that he’s unable to read a speech. He can't read. I don't want the president of the United States to have a cognitive deficiency.
3,443
4,024
181
26,155
771,139
193
120
57
5,161
149,478
46
29
1
1,202
22,057
John Woodard retweeted
11 women with recently diagnosed Type 2 diabetes were given 3 rules: Control carbs Prioritize protein Don't fear fat "Within 90 days their hemoglobin A1c went from 8.9% to 5.6%. Not a single drug was taken and the disease was eliminated." Source: @BenBikmanPhD
48
459
16
2,436
79,995
John Woodard retweeted
MAGA: Trump could cure cancer and you'd still hate him. US: Trump ended cancer research and you still love him.
300
7,313
56
67,326
605,210
John Woodard retweeted
Here is Roger Ebert's first paragraph of his review for "The Mummy" and it is why he was the greatest film critic to ever live
397
4,528
279
55,894
1,368,687
ROGAN: “What makes Mamdani a swindler?” MUSK: “uhhhhhhhh….”
1,844
1,839
741
19,152
3,038,104
John Woodard retweeted
Trumps Third China Deal is Full Capitulation. We get: -1 year reduction of mineral restriction. - Sales agreement for soy beans. China gets: - Reduced Tariffs. - Elimination of port fees. - Advanced AI Chips they can’t make. - No pushback on Taiwan.
152
764
57
2,104
43,142
John Woodard retweeted
The Walton family (who own Walmart) are worth $400 billion, yet many of their employees are on SNAP. Bezos is worth $400 billion, many Amazon employees require SNAP. The people who need help are not the problem. It’s corporate greed. It’s an unwillingness to pay a living wage
3,758
17,802
537
74,961
1,192,996
Walmart signs all their employees up for SNAP. Why? It allows Walmart to pay employees below what it costs to survive and has your taxes make up the difference (while they pocket it) “Shareholder capitalism” Henry Ford paid you enough to support a wife, 4kids and buy a car.
If SNAP were cutoff in the US, Walmart US stores would have a negative operating margin. SNAP is literally what makes Walmart profitable. Might want a short Walmart stock if we're going to stay shut down.
470
2,501
139
12,335
388,865
"Why are there so many people in SNAP?! You all need to get to work!" Excluding children and elderly individuals, the reason why so many people are on SNAP is because this country allows businesses to pay people unlivable wages, which effectively makes SNAP a corporate subsidy.
1,073
8,015
200
42,605
648,568
I will correct every single one of these I see. My rates dropped dramatically. The insurance is better. I wasn’t shut out due to preexisting conditions. The ACA saved a friend’s life when he developed a heart condition. We cannot go backward.
Obamacare was a terrible blow for middle class Americans who buy their own health care - they had to subsidize all kinds of people and ailments and felt it in the pocketbook. Asking them to subsidize illegals is a bridge way too far. You wonder if the left even knows that.
315
875
28
4,851
90,654
Fun fact: Ronald Reagan signed into law a legal mandate that requires all hospitals to provide emergency medical treatment to anyone - including undocumented immigrants. Choke on that Mike Johnson.
82
1,411
41
4,047
32,740
It’s actually kind of scary how easily these people lie…
729
5,134
330
14,378
360,812
John Woodard retweeted
Hey MAGA, it was Ronald Reagan who made it law for every person, illegal or not, to receive medical services in the ER.
2,007
8,136
322
41,629
940,811
I've got a question for the group: For those who do intermittent fasting, how do you get enough protein? At 176 pounds I'm supposed to get 126 grams per day at the minimum. But Eggs are only 6 an beef is 7 per oz, and I just don't know if I can eat that much in 2 meals.
3
1
179
Simon Lizotte (MPO winner) vs Eveliina Salonen (FPO winner) 🍿
2
4
127
7,264
In a study of ~2.5M children, there was a small association between in utero Tylenol use and subsequent autism. But the association disappears entirely when you introduce sibling controls, implying it’s spurious.
155
1,228
100
7,169
793,335
A lot of people talk about metabolic flexibility, but don't understand it. They may know it's the ability of the body (or specific tissues, to be more precise) to use either fat or glucose, but they don't understand what regulates this shift. Insulin is the determining factor. When insulin is high, cells will rely more on glucose (the high glucose is what spiked the insulin anyway) and, at the same time, availability of fats will be reduced (via inhibition of lipolysis). Furthermore, insulin inhibits fat burning by inhibiting essentially every enzyme involved in the process. In contrast, when insulin is low, glucose use drops (and glucose levels should normally be lower) while fats are mobilized from fat tissue. Moreover, the low insulin removes the inhibition of burning that fat for fuel. So, metabolic flexibility is simply another way to gauge the levels of insulin. Of course, in people with chronically elevated insulin, the body becomes "stuck" in glucose-burning mode. This is why people with insulin resistance have metabolic inflexibility.
25
85
7
426
26,226