It would be self-destructive act, but I'd really love to create a bingo card of all the bottom-feeder "labels" who reach out in DMs the second a track goes viral.
A “recorded music radius clause” is also known as an exclusive term in a recording agreement. I have no insight here in particular, but typically it lasts 6-12 months after an album’s release, assuming the contract ends with the last album.
Charley Crockett's new album "Clovis" has been yanked from streaming services.
#FREECHARLEY
savingcountrymusic.com/charl…
I know what truly won't age well...
”You're not gonna win, there's no fighting AI”
Diplo's take on AI is spot on, and he's ahead of 99% of creatives, across all disciplines
> it's inevitable, and you're dumb if you don't use it
> it's a tool, just like many other things before it
> taste and references matter A LOT
amazing interview by @DanielSWall
Brilliant album
Alt-country revivalism and incisive songwriting at its best.
Album Review – The Droptines – “Drought Flower”
savingcountrymusic.com/album…
John P. Strohm retweeted
OK, not to brag or be elitist here but let’s see a show of hands of other artists who DO NOT use Al to write or generate music. ✋🏻
Mikey here is just trying to sell something, but it’s a bad message to send out. It’s worth the emptiness and struggle to create from/with nothing.
AI use is “the Ozempic of the music industry — everybody is on it, and nobody wants to talk about it,” Mikey Shulman, CEO of Suno AI music generator, recently said. #RollingStoneFutureOfMusic
More: rollingstone.com/music/music…
John P. Strohm retweeted
Another half marathon in the books as the 11th annual Biscuit Ruck/Run finished at Loveless Cafe this morning. Awesome event with a group of men who are becoming better leaders in our community every single day. Thanks for organizing @johnpstrohm! Proud of you guys! @F3FranklinTN
Energy of a law student winging it in a moot court competition.
Bondi: “Donald Trump signed that law to release all of those documents. He is the most transparent president in the nation’s history”
@Grok, remind us how Trump fought against this bill and what he reportedly said to Republicans who signed the discharge petition. Keep it short
John P. Strohm retweeted
Post-run man with arm. What is model overfitting and how can you tell if it’s happening to yours?
John P. Strohm retweeted
An app that started as a way to share status updates with your friends now undresses people in photos on demand.
Not all technological progress is good.
John P. Strohm retweeted
Spotify Wrapped just dropped so here's your reminder:
Go check out your top 5 artists...
Then:
Buy their record
Get tickets to a show
Join their community
Subscribe to their mailing list
(Even moreso if that artist is still on their way up)
Go a little deeper.
And go direct.
John P. Strohm retweeted
This is the way forward. Ban AI-generated visual art, ban AI music, ban photorealistic AI images of people. Shame corporations that platform and promote AI “artists.” Support human writing and human art.
The child’s brain doesn’t make copies. Nobody who understands AI training disputes that copies are made, which is obviously what copyright protects. The only question is w/r/t to fair use, which is an affirmative defense. This is straight-up slopaganda.
People keep saying “AI training on books is theft,” but that only works if you fundamentally misunderstand what training actually is.
Here’s the simplest, most human analogy.
When a child learns to read, they absorb patterns from thousands of sentences. They learn grammar, rhythm, storytelling, vocabulary, structure. Their brain builds an internal model of how language works.
Later, that child writes something new.
What they write is influenced by everything they’ve read, but it is not a copy of any book. It’s a transformed, abstracted understanding.
No one would ever claim the child is “stealing” from every author they learned from.
No one expects them to pay royalties to the books they used to learn how to write.
No one thinks learning itself is a crime.
Learning doesn’t duplicate the original.
It synthesizes patterns into something new.
AI does the exact same thing. It learns statistical patterns of language. Just like we do.
If pattern learning were theft, then every human writer would be guilty. Every journalist, scientist, poet, novelist, teacher, and student. Humanity itself would be a copyright violation.
The output matters, not the learning.
If an AI copied a book verbatim and sold it, that would be theft.
But training?
That’s just learning, the same process every human mind goes through.
If we criminalize learning, we don’t just break AI.
We break everything.
manipulative and gross.
I grew up singing. I sang everywhere I went, I wrote songs in my diary, I told teachers that I wanted to be a singer & songwriter when I grew up.
But wanting to be a musician in 2006 required resources that a low-income family didn't have. My parents couldn't afford to get me any instruments. They couldn't pay for music lessons. They couldn't get me into studios. A dream I had became just a memory, until now.
I am beyond proud and honored to get to work at a company that is enabling music creation for everyone. For the 13 year old kid in their bedroom who dreams of being a musician, you can be one. For all of the professional artists, you can do more of what you love.
I really wish Suno existed 20 years ago when I was a kid in elementary school, showing strangers songs I wrote with no way to produce them. But I'm really, really happy that it exists today, for all of the other kids who might need it.
We are still just getting started :)
Two of my favorite folks I’ve met in Nashville, Korby Lenker and @aaronleetasjan1… looking forward to this’n.
Unbelievable.
It's time to make some noise for your #CMAawards Vocal Group of the Year, @RedClayStrays 🤩🎉






























