Austinites - pay attention.
AUSTIN MAN shoved a man to the ground on Congress Ave and punched him in the head repeatedly while yelling that he was in the CIA. The victim was just standing on the corner minding his own business.
Police had been called about a fight involving a machete, and they found a hatchet lying in the middle of the street.
The assault charge was dismissed.
Since then, Gilbert Perez has asked police to take him to jail three times.
In July he was caught outside a downtown 7-Eleven he'd been banned from, holding a rock, after he tried to break a window. He told the officer he wanted to go to jail.
In August he walked into the same store with a rock and threatened to smash the windows unless staff called the cops. Prosecutors declined to charge him.
Last month he went back again and told police he knew about the ban and "disregarded it." Prosecutors declined that case too. Two days later he refused to leave a business on East Riverside and told the officer he wanted to go to jail.
The Chick-fil-A down the block banned him too. He kept coming back anyway.
In March he was arrested for felony criminal mischief, more than $2,500 in damage. DA Jose Garza's office gave him 7 days.
9 cases. 5 declined or dismissed. His longest sentence was 7 days. He keeps committing crimes and telling the police he wants to go to jail, but prosecutors keep insisting he's safe for the street.
Austin needs this.
As Jen says - Why should anyone be afraid of an audit?!
Maybe it’ll identify fraud or waste. And that would be a good thing, right? Right?!?
Gotta read this!
I've known @jamestalarico for nearly 20 years. When we were at @UTAustin in 2009, he ran the University Democrats and I ran the College Republicans. Although we disagreed, I once considered him a friend. But then he betrayed the entire student body for his own political gain.🧵
Jerry DeVries retweeted
Dear Secretary Bessent @SecScottBessent,
My name is Everett Stern. In 2010 I was a compliance officer at @HSBC. From a back office in New Castle, Delaware, I watched billions of dollars move to drug cartels, sanctioned regimes, and terrorist organizations. The enemies of the United States. I documented it, I escalated it, and when the bank would not act, I took it to the @FBI, the @CIA, and eventually the @SECGov.
The result was a $1.92 billion settlement. At the time, it was one of the largest in American history. It was also about five weeks of the bank’s profit. Not one banker was charged. Not one went to prison.
I paid a different price. I lost my career, my savings, and my place in the industry I had trained for. I was blacklisted. Every door in American finance closed at once. I slept on a camping cot in a 300 square foot apartment because I could not afford a bed, and I waited tables at @PFChangs to eat. I tell you this not for sympathy, but so you understand that I know exactly what it costs to do the right thing in American finance, and exactly how little the system does in return.
I made that sacrifice because I believed it would change something.
Yesterday, your department fined @BankofAmerica $1.2 billion for failing to report more than $5 billion in suspicious transactions, some of it tied by your own findings to Chinese laundering networks, narcotics, and the southwest border, alongside 475 apparent sanctions violations touching Russia, Iran, and global terrorism. The bank admitted it willfully violated the Bank Secrecy Act.
Fourteen years after HSBC. A bank with “America” in its name. And once again, not one individual charged.
Secretary Bessent, I want to say plainly what I believe you already know. The fines are not working.
A fine is paid by shareholders, absorbed by the balance sheet, and forgotten by the next earnings call. Bank of America reported earnings this morning. Nobody who set the alert thresholds, nobody who decided the 2024 cease and desist could wait, nobody who chose the backlog over the law will lose a single thing they value. Their lives are untouched. That is the entire reason the behavior repeats.
This is money laundering. This is blood money. Money that reaches a cartel buys fentanyl that kills Americans. Money that reaches a terrorist organization buys the next attack. This country has fought a war on drugs and a war on terror for decades, at enormous cost in lives and treasure, and all the while we have allowed the financing to flow through institutions we charter and regulate. Cut off the money and we win. We have never seriously tried.
There is also a question of equal justice that I cannot let go.
Before I walked into the FBI building to report HSBC, I stopped in front of the Great Seal on the wall and read the words engraved beneath it: “Justice is the defense of our liberty.” I believed that. I still want to. But every day in this country, people go to prison for crimes that are nothing next to moving money for the people who want Americans dead. A suit, a title, and a corporate badge should not be a shield from the consequences that apply to everyone else. If a street dealer goes to prison for what he sells, the banker who moved the cartel’s money should be standing next to him.
I also want to raise something that is rarely said in these conversations. Why has no one inside Bank of America come forward the way I did? The answer is that everyone in American banking knows what happened to me, and to the whistleblowers who came after. The last person who spoke up is the only policy anyone believes. That is a culture problem, and it starts with leadership, in the banks and in the agencies that regulate them.
This is not a political issue. It has spanned administrations of both parties. It is a national security issue, and I am asking you to treat it as one.
Three things would change the math overnight.
Refer individuals for criminal prosecution. Not the analyst in the queue. The executives who set the thresholds and chose the risk. One banker in handcuffs would do more than every fine in Treasury’s history combined.
End “too big to jail.” An institution cannot be too big to fail and too big to jail at the same time. If it is the first, it must be held to a higher standard, not a lower one.
And if Bank of America will not act as America’s bank, review its charter. A national charter is a privilege granted on behalf of the American people. It should be conditioned on not moving money for the people trying to kill them.
Secretary Bessent, you said yesterday that these actions send a clear message that even the biggest institutions are not above the law. With respect, the institution was never the problem. The people inside it are above the law, and they know it. Until that changes, I will keep writing letters like this one, and the next bank will keep paying the next fine.
I gave up everything I had to stop this. I am asking you to use the power you have to finish it.
Respectfully,
Everett A. Stern
HSBC Whistleblower
Founder and Intelligence Director, Tactical Rabbit
Jerry DeVries retweeted
.@EllenTroxclair absolutely cooks @JosePGarza's office. Garza was too chicken to show up himself so he sent one of his lackeys. #txlege
Jerry DeVries retweeted
How many people have to die in #Austin for DA Garza to care? How many women have to be attacked? How many victims have to live in fear? The safety of your neighborhood depends on the DA bringing criminals to justice. If they won’t do their job, #Texas will. #txlege
.@EllenTroxclair absolutely cooks @JosePGarza's office. Garza was too chicken to show up himself so he sent one of his lackeys. #txlege
No. Most don’t yet appreciate how MASSIVE this is?!
What an amazing effort by hyper talented people.
A service that’s going to help so many!
I don't think a lot of people truly grasp what an accomplishment this is - and how quickly it will shrink the bloat of the bureaucracy.
29,000 separate websites, condensed to just 1. xitter.cf/rapidresponse47/status…
Get a clue @Delta
Replying to @DesireeAmerica4
Don’t want to get caught up in the Delta/Ed hate, but the simple truth is Delta seems perfectly happy to provide their customers a horrible wifi experience while pretending to remain a premium airline.
Amazon’s product is delayed..in reality it is delayed indefinitely as their rocket intended to get their business in orbit literally exploded on launch. 2028 is likely a pipe dream
Meanwhile…Delta just wants its customers to enjoy the suck….
It’s a bad look and if it’s also driven out of some woke Elon hate, it’s even worse. If I was on the @delta board, I’d be demanding a full review for the shareholders.
Show me the business case.
My guess is the board is filled with friends of Ed. And perhaps there are a few friends of Elon that will soon make themselves known.
Regardless, it’s got to be a business driven decision. There is no room for pettiness and stupid rivalries over politics
This is so cool!
Something all Americans will benefit from!!
Today at Hello America, we witnessed history in the making.
For almost 50 years, I've dedicated my life to helping people improve the quality of their lives, and I've worked with presidents on both sides of the aisle for more than 35 years.
I'm truly grateful to have been here to kick off the launch of America.gov, and to introduce the President of the United States and my friend of 15 years, @jgebbia. Joe is the co-founder of Airbnb and America's first Chief Design Officer, and he led the world-class team that built America.gov.
America.gov is a brand-new website built for one purpose: a government that truly SERVES its people.
Our government, sometimes with the best of intentions, has made it very difficult to get the help you've been promised.
Today that changes: 29,000 government websites are now ONE, using AI to answer your questions, and soon it will do the work for you. It's one website, one place, all the answers. It's simple, easy, and there for you whenever you need it.
You can even speak in three languages, with more to come. You have to check it out!
People right, left, and center came together to make this happen. Built by Americans, for Americans, to change the quality of your life. 🇺🇸🤝
This is huge! Please read and take note.
Worth noting!
Impressive. This set of talks, along with the new America dot gov website, has the unmistakable feel of an Apple launch event. They're rebooting the federal government as a tech startup. Several observations.
(1) First, with this new AI interface to the entire federal government, if it works as promised, there won't be a single American who can't say their life wasn't helped at least in part by AI, or that the benefits accrued solely to zillionaires. This in itself cannily mitigates anti-datacenter sentiment.
(2) Second, Joe Gebbia and Marco Rubio's talks on simplifying name changes and passport filings introduce a completely new era where the US government is actually launching tangible features that benefit users.
(3) Third, this launch event in and of itself may visibly drive reform. It could become much more important than the State of the Union. Unlike laws, code is user-visible, and can be instantly audited by the public, as Obama found out with the failed obamacare website launch. So: the annual America dot gov event may be substance, whereas SOTU is traditionally optics. I wouldn't be surprised to see the President present at the next one.
(4) Fourth, this kind of event is a perfect example of where tech and red cooperate best. They both hate bureaucracy. Automating paperwork with code reduces the power of statists over both capitalists and nationalists. It's also hard to undo by other admins: once you digitize a process, hard to turn it back to paper.
(5) Fifth, it's an obvious point perhaps, but think about how much influence YCombinator has had in 20 years. From Gebbia's Airbnb joining their 2009 batch to a complete overhaul of the user interface of the US bureaucracy, and thus the US government.
(6) Sixth, this is another take on the network state. The functional part of the US (the network, meaning tech) is merging with and partially reforming the dysfunctional part (the state, meaning bureaucracy) by automating 20th century paper forms.
As a tech startup, there will no doubt be bugs and user issues and so on, but unlike with paper laws those issues will be visible and the code fixes will be verifiable. A new era of AI America. Rooting for them.
Chamath explains the political calculus behind Obama’s anti AI speech
“This is a very important moment for a very simple reason, which is that the world is about to endow 3-6 companies with about $10 trillion of wealth.”
“And what Obama knows very well is that most of those companies are overwhelmingly left leaning. And what he also knows is that there is a huge portion of that money that will then get put into philanthropic and charitable causes that then he and the people around him will be beneficiaries of."
“That is the truth. We already know this because we know that some of these frontier corporations actually ask you to sign up DAFTs and have a portion of your stock that you're willing to pledge. So this money is going to go to things other than consumption or savings. It's going to go into PACs, it's going to go into political movements, and they stand to disproportionately benefit."
“So this has nothing to do with prosperity. This is a very simple political calculus. If you freeze frame the economy the way it is today, a handful of organizations that will disproportionately be able to affect the Democrats will win, they will capture the lion's share of the economic gains. And then they will help the Democrats win power. That's all this is."
Jerry DeVries retweeted
Ready to have your mind blown?
Senator John Kennedy on Elon Musk and DOGE exposing USAID, “I'll tell you what Mr. Musk discovered. I find it fascinating. He discovered:
- The American taxpayers are giving money to Afghanistan
- He found that we are giving money to Yemen
- He found that we are giving money to Syria
- He found that the USAID has 10,000 people employees, and every year they give away $40 billion
- He found that the USAID gave money to support electric vehicles in Vietnam. Our money, taxpayer money
- He found that the USAID gave money to a transgender clinic in India. “I didn't know that. I bet you the American people didn't know that”
- He found that USAID gave $1.5 million to a Serbian LGBTQ group, they got $1.5 million to QUOTE, “advanced diversity, equity, inclusion in Serbia's workplaces and business communities”
- They found that USAID spent $164 million to support radical organizations around the world
- They gave $122 million of that to groups aligned with foreign terrorist organizations
- According to this report in Mr. Musk, the USAID has given millions of dollars to quote organizations in Gaza controlled by Hamas
- He found that we gave $2 million, USAID did, for sex changes in Guatemala
- He found that we gave $20 million to produce a new Sesame Street show in Iraq
- He found that we gave $4.5 million of taxpayer money to combat misinformation in Kazakhstan
- He found that we gave $10 million, USAID did, of meals to an al-Qaeda-linked terrorist group called the Nusra Front
- Mr. Musk found that we gave $7.9 million of taxpayer money to a project that would teach Sri Lankan journalists to avoid binary gendered language. (The USAID took 8 million bucks and gave it to a bunch of journalists in Sri Lanka to teach them how to avoid binary gendered language)
- USAID gave $1.5 million to promote LGBT advocacy in Jamaica
- They gave $1.5 million to rebuild the Cuban media ecosystem
- They gave $1.5 million for quote, art for inclusion of people with disabilities in Belarus
- Another $3.9 million for LGBT causes in Macedonia
- $8.3 million for equity and inclusion education in Nepal
“I could go all night and many of my colleagues are upset. They're really mad at Mr. Musk. Hell, I think we ought to give him a medal”
Geaux Cajun Navy!
When Hurricane Katrina drowned New Orleans in 2005, the federal government froze.
FEMA had no plan. Bureaucrats demanded forms. Police blocked roads.
You know who saved thousands of Americans?
A bunch of duck hunters with beer bellies and pickup trucks from the Louisiana swamps.
They called themselves the “Cajun Navy.”
Eighty percent of New Orleans was submerged under fifteen feet of toxic, sewage-filled water.
Thousands of elderly people and children were baking on rooftops in 95-degree heat, screaming for help that wasn't coming.
Officials were issuing warnings: “Do not enter. Unsafe. You don't have authorization.”
Down in the bayous of Lafayette and Houma, men looked at their TV screens, walked out to their sheds, and hooked their 14-foot flat-bottom fishing boats to their Chevy trucks.
They didn't ask for permission.
They didn't ask for gas money.
They didn't check who was Democrat or Republican, Black or White.
Hundreds of swamp boys drove straight into the disaster zone with shotguns, flashlights, and coolers of water.
When local authorities tried to turn them back at checkpoints, they ignored the deputies, launched their johnboats into the floodwaters from highway overpasses, and followed the cries in the dark.
They dodged live power lines and submerged cars.
They cut holes through rooftops with chainsaws.
They hauled shivering grandmothers, newborn infants, and abandoned dogs into their boats for days without sleep.
No government badge.
No paycheck.
Just regular American rednecks who refused to let their neighbors drown.
God bless the Cajun Navy. That is what makes this country unbreakable. 🇺🇸🛶
Jerry DeVries retweeted
David Friedberg: Obama Doesn’t Understand AI and He’s Making Prosperity Political
President Obama last week:
“If we are thinking about AI just in terms of how do we cure cancer or get better energy, you can do that without having agentic AI. That's a misalignment between what our society needs and the commercial imperatives that these companies are facing.”
@friedberg:
“These words honestly just, they made me, like, emotionally distressed that if he's a leader that people listen to and he doesn't really articulate accurately what's going on, it's sad that we've lost the plot.
I think it's sad that we aren't all kind of holding hands saying, ‘My God, the future is here, and we all get to leap forward, and we get to bring people up.’
For years, Obama orated beautifully about the importance of bringing people up, about giving people the opportunity to progress, about letting people advance themselves. And there's never been a more equalizing technology, a better economic opportunity for prosperity for everyone than these technologies, than these tools.
And to hand wave the word agentic and say we don't need agentic AI to solve cancer shows how little he actually understands how this technology works and how it's all become just a shorthand for a political fight to what?
What are you fighting for? What is the political battle that says, ‘I am going to leave half the population behind, and I'm going to make an argument against prosperity for all, in order to make my party look like a morally superior party, and to cast the other side as bad when the other side has literally discovered fire and the world now has fire, and we're going to go take water and throw it on the fire.’
No one gets fire because the other guys are saying that fire is good.”




























