jcford retweeted
Thank you @SeanHannity for letting me set the record straight. Bottom line, the more than 25% of people who have severe autism will never go on a date, write a poem, live independently, or have a job. We need to identify the exposures that are causing this epidemic and compensate the families of the injured. @HHSgov under my leadership, will be unrelenting in assisting affected individuals in living up to all their potentials.
jcford retweeted
To be clear, what the @DOGE team and @USTreasury have jointly agreed makes sense is the following:
- Require that all outgoing government payments have a payment categorization code, which is necessary in order to pass financial audits. This is frequently left blank, making audits almost impossible.
- All payments must also include a rationale for the payment in the comment field, which is currently left blank. Importantly, we are not yet applying ANY judgment to this rationale, but simply requiring that SOME attempt be made to explain the payment more than NOTHING!
- The DO-NOT-PAY list of entities known to be fraudulent or people who are dead or are probable fronts for terrorist organizations or do not match Congressional appropriations must actually be implemented and not ignored. Also, it can currently take up to a year to get on this list, which is far too long. This list should be updated at least weekly, if not daily.
The above super obvious and necessary changes are being implemented by existing, long-time career government employees, not anyone from @DOGE. It is ridiculous that these changes didn’t exist already!
Yesterday, I was told that there are currently over $100B/year of entitlements payments to individuals with no SSN or even a temporary ID number. If accurate, this is extremely suspicious.
When I asked if anyone at Treasury had a rough guess for what percentage of that number is unequivocal and obvious fraud, the consensus in the room was about half, so $50B/year or $1B/week!!
This is utterly insane and must be addressed immediately.
jcford retweeted
Hurricane Helene was 2 months ago
NEW: Asheville North Carolina victim crying “It hurts. It hurts to know that people's got family, that they haven't a clue where they're even at, and bodies that can't even be identified. But none of this is making the news. Nothing”
FEMA not paying out, “I've got a brother up here. I've got my aunt that totally lost anything. And to the best of my knowledge, they still haven't heard back from their claims.”
She says contractors are not being paid for their work clearing and building, “They haven't even been paid for their work or as a contractor to get all this debris on out of us because they've yet to be paid — those guys worked relentlessly”
Says the government came in and did photo ops with helicopters and good but they haven’t seen them since
We are the news now, make sure these stories get heard
jcford retweeted
Please share this post if you’d be more likely to eat at a restaurant chain that banned seed oils and used beef tallow instead
jcford retweeted
Tonight I would like to ask you to pray for Department of Transportation employees who are working so hard to get our roads restored and open in areas devastated by Hurricane Helene. The amount of destruction is overwhelming. Remember, our DOT workers and their families have been through the same storm. Many of them are still without power also. Many of their homes and driveways were damaged. They are working day and night—giving 110%. Join me in praying for them. And when you see them out working, smile, wave, and tell them thank you for all that they’re doing!
jcford retweeted
Which candidate, party, or "side" is most likely to increase gov't control over news, communications, expression, & speech?
Because that's the group which is seeking permanent power for itself (and a permanent disadvantage for all who question it)
It's the issue of issues
jcford retweeted
Wow. This is not even in the right zip code.
A “Trump Voter” is not a Trump enthusiast. Many Trump voters despise Trump.
A Trump voter is someone who has said: “the expected value of a Trump Presidency minus the expected value of a Kamala presidency is positive.”
I am trying to figure this out myself. For example, suppose one thinks every terrible thing about Donald Trump, including that he is irresponsible enough to risk getting us into nuclear war. Only, she also thinks he is *less* likely to do so than Kamala Harris who covered up and continues to cover up a Commander in Chief with dementia during a half proxy war involving our main thermonuclear rival, and who herself seems installed by a primary-avoidance coup, as well as clueless and air headed.
Why does that voter need not to be demeaned? Maybe that person is actually seeing something Harris voters have totally missed.
Maybe that voter had a child whose school encouraged cutting off that kids breasts or genitals during teen years which are temporarily awkward for almost everyone. Maybe that person had a violent recidivist criminal or illegal alien rape or kill their niece while a prosecutor or border patrol did little to aggressively protect the innocent because of a progressive agenda.
Save your pity for the poor Trump voter. He or she isn’t necessarily below your or my level of understanding.
I don’t think I can vote Trump. But I don’t think I can vote for Kamala Harris either.
The Democratic Party, is out of its mind. We aren’t the party of the educated because we are plausibly the smarter party anymore. The educated professionals inside institutional employers simply became an interest group to be slopped at the trough. Just like hedge fund managers and unions.
We aren’t Anti-war. We aren’t Pro-democracy. We aren’t for a level playing field. We aren’t pro-family. We aren’t for Free Speech and against mind control.
We aren’t simply the good guys these days. I’m sorry to be the one to break it to you.
My column argues that Democrats should call out Trump himself but avoid demeaning voters drawn to him. Calling Trump voters bigots or other names is unfair, counterproductive and reflects the condescension that too many feel for less educated Americans. nytimes.com/2024/08/31/opini…
jcford retweeted
This, and Disney Star Wars, and all of modern Hollywood, and all of Manhattan tradpub, can be explained with one simple idea.
And no, it isn't "Satan". No religious suppositions are required. What's going on here is venial, and even more depraved.
Narcissism.
You see, there are two kinds of artistic creativity. Both are based on egotism, but one is healthy, and the other is destructive.
The first says "Art is about beauty and truth. I will create that which is beautiful and true, that which uplifts those who look upon it. And my ego will be satisfied when my work is acknowledged as good, both by myself and others."
This is based on a healthy version of egotism... pride.
Pride is self-respect, a sense of one's own proper dignity or value, as earned through merit, virtue, and accomplishment.
The second says "Art is about self-expression. I will create art based on whatever is in myself, no matter how ugly, deceptive, and low. I will make myself visible in every aspect of my art, and my ego will satisfied, because I will be the center of attention, with everyone looking at me."
This is based on the sick version of egotism... narcissism. It is the ego that demands to be the center of attention, regardless of what others actually wish to see or would like to pay attention to.
It is the revenge of the neglected child, not on the mother who ignored him, but on the entire universe.
Great art is not about self-expression. It comes from the self, it is shaped by the self, but it the truth it expresses is shared and universal. This is why it speaks to others, not just the artist.
When we look upon a fine sculpture, we see only David, not Michelangelo.
When we read a great story, we do not see Tolkien, and we forget, for a moment, that Frodo and Sam aren't real.
We can say Van Gogh painted one white iris because he was lonely, isolated within a crowd, but if we do say that, we care because we have been lonely, too.
Great art makes the artist invisible. He waits backstage until the art is done, and it is time for him to step out and take a bow, receive his applause and be satisfied in a work well done. He does not stand between the audience and their enjoyment of the work.
But, for this precise reason, great art cannot emerge from narcissism. The narcissist cannot bear to upstaged by anything, even the work of his own hands, the child of his own brain.
The narcissistic artist creates art not to please others, but to force others to look at him. He must stamp his personality on every corner of the work, make it his and his alone, and remind the audience, in every moment, in every place they direct their gaze, that this work is his, and that he is what truly matters, here.
This art, shown here, is not ugly by accident. It is ugly because the artists wish you to look upon their ugliness, both outer and inner.
It is ugly because its message is not "look at this" but "look at me".
This is why the left is obsessed with "representation" in art. This is why they cover themselves in ugly, mismatched tattoos, and dye their hair pink, purple, and blue. This is why they write self-indulgent stories about "identity" and "finding your squad".
They are screaming their identity at the void, never realizing that it's not only possible, but easy, to be unique without being interesting or useful.
Those who fancy themselves to be beautiful unique snowflakes would do well to remember that the slightest touch of heat will turn them into homogeneous, ubiquitous, undifferentiated water.
They can work for Disney all they want, making black lesbian Jedi so that "the character can look just like me", but the character will be boring because they are boring.
In other words, what we are seeing here is not a rebellion against god (if you are religious) or civilization and merit (if you aren't), it's something far worse.
It's the petty, ugly, banalities of an entire subculture of tiresome neurotics who cannot dredge one single beautiful, interesting, or true thing out of their souls that would make you voluntarily pay attention.
I blame their mothers.
jcford retweeted
If I were the President running for reelection, I would simply stop being *secretly* inexhaustible and sharp as a tack and do it in public at speeches and campaign events.
jcford retweeted
There isn’t a single pundit on MSNBC who even remotely represents the average GOP voter. 100 million people aren’t all liars. Your network is simply choosing to deny your viewers an opposing viewpoint. It’s really that simple.
jcford retweeted
It’s incredible to me that there are not only lawyers but judges who see the First Amendment as conferring a right to speak, when its actual purpose is to restrain government from interfering in our natural right of expression. They have it backwards
jcford retweeted
Good book books.apple.com/us/audiobook…
jcford retweeted
Thread of what's happening in Acapulco #AcapulcoOtis
jcford retweeted
Blaming the obese is not productive. It’s not like human nature suddenly turned lazy over the last 30 years. Something is poisoning Americans. Let’s find out what it is and eliminate it.
President Biden could put to rest any concerns about his fitness for office by engaging me in a vigorous, issues-oriented debate. Let’s end the speculation and let the voters see for themselves. #Kennedy24
Quote tweet #BidenDebateKennedy if you agree
jcford retweeted
🧵 @RobertKennedyJr Should Receive Secret Service Protection
This thread will explain why…
























