Pure speculation but maybe their drive to try and beat the other top models led to it not being as great of a daily driver; maybe it's better on paper at some things but in practice not good enough to use as the daily driver. I expect my daily driver to do tasks that aren't particularly hard, but aren't just trivial either. 4.5 seems like it's better at that, thus far. Will give 4.7 another couple weeks then switch back to 4.5 if that pattern holds. I was *very* happy with 4.5 as a daily driver. Again, emphasizing this is all highly unscientific. It could just be coincidence.

To be fair, even without AI it wouldn't have been a multi-quarter migration, so no clue why it thought that. But probably a few weeks.

Especially if you've developed the understanding of where AI is good and where it's bad, SKILLS, etc. you can almost always know where it clearly fixed the issue vs nope it's more complex and needs humans. Even in the latter it's almost always faster than just asking someone else to fix it for you.

For many folks this may be a duh thing, but I see a lot of folks who are very "monogamous" with their models or at least within a company. e.g. only use Anthropic models or OpenAI models.

This is not my password, stop asking.