We oppose certain news aggregators and so-called “OSINT” accounts for a reason. Too often, their priorities are misaligned with the principles of verification. Many of these accounts are driven by visibility, engagement, and monetization. Attention is their primary objective. This creates an environment where speed outweighs responsibility, where speculation is presented as fact, and where unverified claims spread faster than corrections. The President of the United States recently reposted content from an account known for making frequent mistakes while still claiming to be an OSINT account, despite the fact that it can simply change its handle. At GeoConfirmed, our approach is fundamentally different. We are volunteers, and every contributor works on this as a personal commitment, not as a business. Our motivation is simple: We guarantee the exact location: the "Where". Our website is fully funded by our webmaster. There is no commercial model behind our work. Whether we have 10,000 followers or 1 million is irrelevant. Facts DO matter. X has become one of the biggest spreaders of disinformation and misinformation since Elon Musk took over. People are being rewarded for generating attention, which makes verification seem irrelevant because speed matters more. Speed means attention. Insane stories mean attention. Insane pictures mean attention. And now the President of the United States has reposted content from an account known for spreading unverified stories: He reposted an AI-manipulated image that had nothing to do with the bombings. The responsibility does not lie only with the author: X also plays a role. Instead of rewarding fact-checkers and valuable accounts that add real value, X amplifies fake news. If people need to place "OSINT" in their name, that is already for drawing attention... The good OSINT accounts usually do not have “OSINT” in their name... (That said, there are also some good OSINT accounts that do include “OSINT” in their name, but those are mostly exceptions.) Be vigilant.