Internet Anarchist retweeted
JustARobot exposed in leaked call with ZV asking for pics of his, and I quote, 'cute little black trap' in a maids dress HAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
JAR is determined, and appears undeterred when informed that the pictures were taken when ZV was 17. Very concerning lol
TeamWater one year update!! The team is working so hard and making amazing progress. Really grateful to all the creators who supported this and everyone who donated. YOU are the reason TeamWater is able to save lives. Check out the video to see what’s happened so far :D
🚨 BREAKING: Andrew and Tristan Tate have been arrested in Miami tmz.com/2026/07/18/andrew-tr…
Internet Anarchist retweeted
Here are the economics of content creation, because most people commenting on this are not Creators and are completely IGNORANT...
In addition to not reading the terms of service, which would tell anyone the lawyer for this lawsuit is ripping off his clients...
Most of you as consumers have not idea how Creators actually get paid and how it works, or how much/little, even you as an individual die hard fan actually generate in revenue when you only support with your eyeballs...
That sounds ungrateful... but I want you to actually run the math here...
The average content creator based in entertainment has an RPM of $5 per 1000 views if they are fortunate (long form only) which means each individual viewer is approximately $.002 per view... 1/5 of a penny per view...
The average creator in entertainment uploads 50-100 long form videos per year.
Even if someone watched 100 videos of that person's long form catalog that is $.20
You get 50-100 long form videos to enjoy... for FREE... and your contribution is $.20... that's it...
That's how much an individual dedicated viewer contributes to a creator with their eyeballs as a DIE HARD FAN...
if they creator had a $20 RPM like in finance it jumps to about $.80 as a die hard fan...
If someone is getting VIRAL views that adds up and is a nice living, but that is the .01% elite of creators in long form... most of whom are already RICH...
So the working class creators who make up the majority of monetized creators really aren't subsidized by their fans if their fans are not customers.
Sponsored content is the way they make their money.
YouTube Premium does pay a share of that money to Creators... but there are only 100M Premium users worldwide and even established middle class creators still have less than 2% of their audience paying for Premium...
Essentially what consumers advocate for, means that the only people who can make content are essentially broke kids doing it for fun... and people who are already millionaires...
Similar to regular society, the Creator Middle Class has the same problem as the actual Middle Class...
Consumers want high quality... with little or no investment, and when they do invest... it goes to people who are already rich...
Coffeezilla confronted the CEO of Bricks & Minifigs regarding access to a spreadsheet
"I'm so confused..I'm on the file right now..it says owned by BAM franchising inc..created Sep 6, 2024" -C
"So we have the um..I had no idea (who had access)..we don't know how accurate it is, how up to date it was..I appreciate u sharing this with us bc we had no idea..we don't know everything..we don't go looking in every nook and cranny..if that's there, we can now have our team go" -CEO
(Via Coffeezilla on YT)
The Bricks & Minifigs vs Reckless Ben Situation is Insane...
New video out now
youtu.be/61G3Fw_jAhc?si=4C-t…
Bricks & Minifigs is parting ways with Brandon Best and Joshua Johnson due to "a devastating social media campaign"
They say they have reached out to the family that owns the $200,000 LEGO collection to return it and offer compensation for any missing items
Internet Anarchist retweeted
New largest Lego set ever is very pretty but will probably be a very tedious build.
I got a feeling discovery is going to be VERY revealing for Bricks & Minifigs…
Bricks & Minifigs has filed a lawsuit against Reckless Ben, after the YouTuber's viral investigation into the company allegedly stealing a $200,000 Lego collection
YouTube demonetised my official compilation channel for "reused content."
YouTube is claiming I am "taking someone else's content and making minimal changes". This is false, the content is mine and significant changes were made to repurpose the content.
The content is my own videos. From my own 1.8M subscriber channel. That I own.
Their own rejection says I was "taking someone else's content." It's literally mine. @TeamYouTube this is a clear error.
























