Pinned Tweet
Replying to @High_Priest_Dog @SLupin1969 @C_82l @Jesus_is_G_d @PainesReason @Providence1775 @The_Real_BiM @GuyWeeb @SueDenim18 @robster16a @ChadCottle @StandBackUp2 @SuchAngerLilSam @Charlesthornt @PragmaticBent @mr_dull_socks @jandrew62956555 @Lalanamour @EBatterson @jackiebarbosa @debcameron60 @Mullerornis @M_Stone969 @vlynxy1 @bagwell_rob @ScientiaPercept @Good_Lt @ZachFord9 @SeanTibbetts87 @PennyAxa @dvibrationz @hauxton @revresbo1 @xiongtx @vlynxy @John_S_Olson @RichardDawkins
The Selfish Gene proposal in tautological words is:
Genetics is selfish only because selfishness is genetic.
The maths was perfected by WD Hamilton rb>c where r is relatedness by descent, b the total increase in reproduction to an r related group and c the cost to the altruist.
Pittsburgh - Eleven people were killed and six injured in a Pittsburgh synagogue shooting on Saturday, the city's public safety director Wendell Hissrich said, an attack the FBI is investigating as a federal hate crime.
God & Guns. #Madhouse
Do you remember when you joined Twitter? I do! #MyTwitterAnniversary
Woman sues Samsung for $1.8M after cell phone gets stuck inside her vagina worldnewsdailyreport.com/wom…
We must make it clear we are not critical of the Islamic belief system, which is a Democratic right, only Islamic failure to endorse SOP. We can't allow any religion to undermine SOP which is just a Democratic basic under threat world wide even in the USA. @RichardDawkins @rdfs
Dawkins et al miss the point. Religion is politicised myth thus taking the myth literally not metaphorically so making big trouble. Islam fails to separate powers (SOP) so it's a defacto political party and must be criticised as such. Islamic religious beliefs remain immaterial.
Define evol as any NON random gene freq change in a population to have a falsifiable Darwinian proposition. Unfortunately, gene centric Neo D proposes evolution as ANY gene freq change allowing random changes as evolution not just variation rendering evol unfalsifiable @rdfrs
Unless you teach how to separate falsifiable theory from just non falsifiable belief, discussing either is pointless.
@RDFRS_UK
Is anyone here prepared to debate the following topic:
Richard Dawkins Selfish Geneism Reversed Empirically Based Cause & Effect In The Sciences.
Many Thanks
John W Edser
Independent Researcher
@rdfrs
Is anyone here prepared to debate the following topic:
Richard Dawkins Selfish Geneism Reversed Empirically Based Cause & Effect In The Sciences.
Many Thanks
John W Edser
Independent Researcher
No income tax, no sales tax, no tax evasion, no tax accountants, no massively expensive and invasive tax collection(!), just a flat rate of of tax on the movement of ever dollar. #QandA
No matter if you like it or not it's coming via the smartphone electronically replacing paper money. When it does come everyone will wonder what all the hoo haa was really about. #QandA




